This would be an entertaining slap fight if it weren’t for the fact it was distracting two of the highest profile Republican office-holders in the state from real work.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton called on Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan to resign for being a drunkard.
Texas’ top lawyer says House Speaker Dade Phelan needs to resign after being in a state of “apparent debilitating intoxication” while presiding over the House.
Attorney General Ken Paxton made the announcement in a statement released Tuesday afternoon.
“After much consideration, it is with profound disappointment that I call on Speaker Dade Phelan to resign at the end of this legislative session. Texans were dismayed to witness his performance presiding over the Texas House in a state of apparent debilitating intoxication,” said Paxton.
His comments are in reference to a viral video that circulated on social media over the weekend showing Phelan slurring words and acting in a manner that some allege is consistent with intoxication.
Here’s video of Phelan, and I’ve got to say: Point Paxton. Pretty positive Phelan’s pickled:
Is asking him to resign an overreaction? Probably. Back in the halcyon days of yore, back when Democrats controlled the chamber, legislating blotto was a regular occurrence, though I’m not sure any speakers were visibly soused.
Then again, I think Paxton’s pronouncement was predicated on Phelan probing Paxton:
A case of improprieties was laid out by a Texas House committee Wednesday morning against Attorney General Ken Paxton, detailing long-public allegations against the state official of securities fraud and abuse of office dealings with real estate mogul and donor Nate Paul.
The House General Investigating Committee heard three hours of testimony from its team of legal counselors, who since March have been looking into various cases against Paxton that have been playing out in court for years.
Chief Counsel Erin Epley announced formally that the investigation into “Matter A,” one of the anonymous titles the committee uses to conceal the identities of those being investigated and the topics therein, concerns the attorney general himself.
The handful of attorneys involved in the committee’s investigation each have a Harris County background, including working in the Harris County District Attorney’s Office or a U.S. Attorney’s Office. In an apparent attempt to underscore credibility, Chairman Andrew Murr (R-Junction) made a point to note that Epley worked under former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas Ryan Patrick, son of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick.
Epley said the committee has interviewed 15 individuals with connections to Paxton and the allegations, including the four whistleblowers involved in the years-long lawsuit by multiple former employees of his: David Maxwell, Ryan Vassar, Mark Penley, and Blake Brickman.
“General Paxton refers to these men as ‘political appointees,’ but they are his political appointees,” Epley told the committee.
In November 2020, those former employees accused Paxton of abusing his office to assist Paul — who’s donated substantial sums of money to the attorney general — with an ongoing federal probe into his real estate business.
Paxton settled with the whistleblowers in February this year for $3.3 million to conclude the case out of court, but that settlement has since stalled out after the Legislature — specifically the House — denied the attorney general’s request that the state pay for the settlement.
In February, Speaker Dade Phelan (R-Beaumont) said he did not consider the settlement a “proper use of taxpayer dollars.”
The committee also laid out in detail the findings surrounding the eight-year-old securities fraud indictment against Paxton that has bounced around in court for years with no resolution.
The securities charges are bunk that’s already dismissed at the federal level. I’m not sure how much fire can be found in all the smoke of the more recent charges.
My rooting interest here would generally be with Paxton, since he’s doing an excellent job of suing the federal government over various far left lawbreaking, while Phelan is another in a line of squishy Republican speakers backed by business interests to thwart conservative legislation. But neither have exactly covered themselves in glory this week…
