Posts Tagged ‘Ft. Hood’

Ft. Hood Shooting Followups

Thursday, April 3rd, 2014

A few random followups on the Fort Hood shooting:

  • Three people remain in critical condition.
  • More on Fort Hood shooter Ivan Lopez, who was apparently Puerto Rican, not Mexican American as some sources erroneously asserted.
  • Lopez saw no combat in Iraq.
  • Lopez was evidently on Ambien. There’s long been persistent anecdotal evidence that several spree shooters were on similar drugs (some sources for which are more reliable than others). I’m not a chemist, pharmacist or psychiatrist, so I’m not in a position to evaluate such claims, nor to answer the chicken and egg “were they crazy before or after taking such drugs” question. But maybe it’s time for people who do know to take a closer look at the question.
  • Time to allow soldiers to carry their weapons stateside? (Warning: Autoplay.) I think you know my position…
  • U.S. Congressman Mike McCaul agrees.
  • Another Ft. Hood Shooting

    Wednesday, April 2nd, 2014

    Another active shooter at Fort Hood. One confirmed dead. 14 reportedly injured. (Some reports have the shooter dead of self-inflicted wounds; let’s hope so.) Early reports of two shooters are most likely erroneous (as is fairly common in these situations).

    Now is also a good time to go over Karl Rehn’s advice for what to do when faced with an active shooter.

    Update: Shooter identified as one Ivan Lopez, reportedly a soldier. (And remember folks, there’s probably more than one Ivan Lopez in Texas. Don’t break out the Jump to Conclusions mat just yet…)

    Hearing reports that now have four confirmed dead on Twitter, but haven’t seen media confirmation.

    Update 2: Blithely ignoring my own advice one paragraph up, this would seem to be Ivan Lopez’s Google+ page (“Works at 2-8 CAV/Lives in texas”) and his connected YouTube channel. What little this says about the shooter could be measured in a very small thimble.

    Update 3:

    Update 4: Four now confirmed dead, including the shooter.

    Update 5: 11 wounded, two in “extremely grave” condition.

    Update 6: Lopez evidently served four months in Iraq in 2011. “They said the gunman was taking medication and seeking help for depression and anxiety and was undergoing a diagnosis process for PTSD but hadn’t yet been diagnosed.”

    I’m far from an expert, but if it’s been two plus years since Lopez saw combat, I would think that would be ample time to make a PTSD determination or not.

    Update 7: “I don’t endorse carrying concealed weapons on base,” [Lt. Gen. Mark] Milley told reporters. “We have military police officers on base.”

    You know, general, I think we now have enough data points to conclusively prove that that policy isn’t working.

    This Week in Jihad for March 10, 2011

    Thursday, March 10th, 2011

    Another week of Jihad news from the usual sources:

  • Multiculturalism is a failure in France, Germany, and the UK.
  • Egypt has sent special forces into Libya to help topple Gadhafi.
  • Turkey cracks down on critics of the Islamic government.
  • Alabama latest state to have law introduced banning Sharia.
  • Death penalty suggested for Ft. Hood shooter Nidal Hasan. Given that the shooting happened all the way back in 2009, isn’t this a little slow even for the usual wheels of American justice? Maybe if we’re lucky, the actual trial will occur in the home stretch of the 2012 election…
  • France recognizes the rebel government in Libya.
  • What’s the best way to protect the rights of women worldwide? Obviously, appoint the Islamic Republic of Iran to the UN Commission on the Status of Women.
  • Iran is arming the Taliban with rockets.
  • Zimbabwe to sell uranium to Iran. Chalk up another victory to the Axis of Assholes…
  • Fire a disc jockey for expressing reservations about Islam? WMAL decides to Gopher it.
  • Rep. Peter King (R-NY) to hold hearings on the radicalization of American Muslims.
  • Cops agree with King that they don’t get enough tips from the Muslim community.
  • Mark Steyn thinks that if we are going to be doing nation-building, we shouldn’t do such a half-assed job of it.
  • C.) The Jews.
  • You’ve probably seen the news that another James O’Keefe sting caught the director of NPR on camera bashing Republicans, Christians, and Zionists.

  • Today brought followup news that O’Keefe caught another NPR promising to shield members of the group from a government audit.
  • Even NPR staffers are offended. Or at least pretending to be, in order to prevent that sweet, sweet taxpayer teat from being turned off.
  • HELLO I AM MAJOR NIDAL HASAN

    Friday, July 30th, 2010

    YOU MAY BE SURPRISED AT HEARING FROM ME, AS WE HAVE NOT SPOKEN BEFORE, BUT I AM UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU ARE A PERSON OF TRUSTHWORTHYNESS.

    I AM RECEIVING MONTHLY PAYMENTS OF OVER $6,000 A MONTH FROM THE UNITED STATES (U.S.) ARMY, BUT NO BANK WILL CASH THEM FOR ME.

    IF YOU WOULD OPEN A BANK ACCOUNT IN MY NAME, I WILL SPLIT THE PROCEEDS WITH YOU 50/50.

    PLEASE REPLY IN UTTER CONFIDENCE.

    ALLAH AKBAR!

    MAJ. NIDAL HASAN
    CELLBLOCK 3F
    BELL COUNTY JAIL
    111 WEST CENTRAL AVENUE
    BELTON, TX 76513-3078

    The Ft. Hood shooter and the Saudi call to Jihad

    Thursday, November 12th, 2009

    Stratfor suggests that Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan may have been heeding a call to jihad by Nasir al-Wahayshi, leader of al Qaeda on the Arabian Peninsula. (They also note how difficult it is for the FBI to investigate individuals such as Hasan.) Since mine is a relatively young blog, some readers may be unfamiliar with the tenants of Wahhabism, and the Saudi role in spreading its radical ideology. For more background on that, you might want to read Stephen Schwartz’s The Two Faces of Islam. And don’t forget the Saudi role in bankrolling CAIR, the primary Islamist apologist front group in the US.

    Bottom line: The Saudis are still not our friends.

    Tactical Firearms Expert Karl Rehn Examines the Ft. Hood Shooting

    Monday, November 9th, 2009

    I’ve known Karl Rehn for over two decades. Founder and owner of KR Training, a certified NRA instructor, Master Class tactical handgun shooter, and teacher of SWAT teams and other first responders from around the country, I wanted to get his analysis of the Ft. Hood shooting, so I emailed him some questions (in italics below).

    1. When faced with a spree shooter, what is the first thing an unarmed person should do to maximize their survival chances?

    The term typically used by law enforcement is “active shooter”.

    What to do? Take action. There is no one universal action that is guaranteed to work in all situations, because all of these variables are in play:
    - weapon(s) in use by the shooter
    - shooter’s ability
    - your distance from the shooter
    - what others are doing around you
    - features of the building or environment you are in

    If the shooter isn’t in the room you are in now and isn’t aware of you, escape, moving away from the sound of the gunfire. If you are in a room with no avenue of escape except toward the gunfire, lock the door and block it to deny the shooter access to that room.

    Find something to get behind that might stop a bullet, and find something (or multiple things) that you could use to defend yourself should the shooter gain access to the room. Anything that can be thrown or swung like a club is better than empty hands.

    If you are in the same area as the shooter, try to gain the element of surprise and counterattack as aggressively as you can with whatever weapons you can improvise. Public authorities cannot advise citizens to fight back out of fear of liability if citizens are injured or killed fighting back.

    The lessons of previous active shooters incidents are that those that do nothing do not survive. Those that take action have better odds. Go back and read the accounts of the survivors of Virginia Tech. Those that fled quickly, locked and blocked doors and took other defensive actions lived and/or saved others.

    2. Likewise, what is the first thing an armed citizen should do?

    The advice is the same. The only difference is that the armed citizen will have some weapons available.

    Armed citizens are not police officers and have no specific duty to use deadly force to save others or even in their own self defense. Any person moving within an area where there is an active shooter could be mistaken for the shooter by responding officers and shot or killed. There is great risk in an armed citizen going into “hero mode”, both from the shooter and from responding officers. Choosing to do anything beyond protecting yourself is a very personal decision. Some students have told me that they simply could not retreat in a situation where they could save others, regardless of the risk.

    Unarmed friends, associates, and family members of those who regularly carry need to understand that in this type of situation, they need to refrain from doing or saying anything that would cause the armed person (off duty officer or armed citizen) to lose the critical element of surprise in a counterattack.

    3. What particular actions did Officer Kimberly Munley undertake that helped limit Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s death toll?

    I don’t have enough specifics to comment. I know that she attended multiple law enforcement courses offered by TEEX (http://www.teex.org), including the ALERRT program, which specifically trains officers how to respond to an active shooter.

    4. Have you undertaken any specific active shooter scenarios for KR Training classes?

    We have a block of scenarios set in a convenience store in one of our “force on force” classes. In those scenarios, students are placed in a variety of roles, including store employee, unarmed citizen and armed citizen. During the scenarios, each student has to make decisions based on the behavior of the other roleplayers, and the timing and position of people within the store. What they learn from this is how to read a situation and determine the best course of action. Some scenarios end with deadly force and some do not.

    5. Obviously, information about Hasan’s shooting spree is fairly sparse right now. Of the limited information available, does anything strike you of being notable about this incident?

    If it had occurred outside the base, where citizens have the right to carry, there probably would have been one or more armed citizens present that might have taken action to stop the attack earlier in the incident. An armed citizen in Tyler took action during an active shooter incident a few years ago. He was killed by the shooter, but police and city leaders credited his action with saving many lives, including those of police officers.

    6. What do you think about the quality of the news coverage of the issue?

    During the first evening of coverage, I watched CNN because I was staying in a hotel that did not get other news channels. They repeated the phrase “he had a semiautomatic handgun, and that allowed him to get off lots of shots quickly” over and over again.

    The truth is that a revolver can be fired just as quickly as a semiautomatic handgun, and both fire one shot for each pull of the trigger. This is yet another example of reporters showing their ignorance of gun technology and/or their personal biases toward gun control.

    The real story was that he chose a place where he knew that people would be unarmed. Active shooter incidents never happen at shooting ranges and gun shows. Theoretically if guns were the primary ’cause’ of violence, those places would be the most dangerous.

    The history of active shooter incidents is full of cases where the shooter chose a ‘gun free zone’ as the killing ground — and the mainstream media and most Americans continue to blind themselves to this glaring truth, because recognizing it would require them to accept that concealed carry is a deterrent to crime, and that the best approach to personal defense includes carrying a concealed handgun.

    7. What base and/or army policies do you think helped contributed to the tragedy?

    It’s a real tragedy that people that we trust to carry arms in a combat zone were not trusted by their own leaders with the same rights that citizens of Texas are trusted by their government outside the base.

    8. Any final thoughts on how to prevent such incidents in the future, or the best ways for bystanders or police to respond to minimize the death toll for future incidents?

    The most important step each adult should take is to understand that when seconds count, professional help is minutes away. Every adult should learn enough self-defense, first aid and firefighting skills to be able to take action in that critical period between the start of the incident and the arrival of professional help. That means getting training in armed and unarmed self defense, CPR, basic first aid, how to use a fire extinguisher — skills that might keep you and those you care about alive until better equipped, better trained help can arrive. A teacher at Columbine died because he bled to death waiting for the SWAT team to clear the building to let medics in. The basic medical training that soldiers receive saved some lives in this incident, as they applied tourniquets and took other measures to treat those that were shot. That aspect of this incident should not be overlooked or forgotten. Even those that are morally opposed to violence or believe themselves physically or psychologically incapable of fighting can and should be willing to render aid. There are emergency trauma kits and video tutorials available from law enforcement supply companies and training schools like Tactical Response (http://www.tacticalresponse.com). One of these should be in every adult’s car, along with other emergency items like a flashlight, fire extinguisher, and pepper spray. Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.

    Ft. Hood Shooting Spin

    Thursday, November 5th, 2009

    No one should make light of the horrible tragedy at Ft. Hood today. However, it’s very discouraging to read how the MSM refuses to cover the story’s stubborn, politically incorrect facts:

    In this CNN report, there’s still no mention of the fact the shooter is a Muslim some ten hours after the shooting, and eight after Major Malik Nadal Hasan’s identity was first reported. (Of course, CNN has a history of refusing to report “inconvenient” facts.)

    Likewise, the LA Times refuses to cover those same details.

    Here’s the rub: This is a huge national story with tons of coverage…and it’s obvious that the MSM is lying to us by omission. The chances are extremely strong that they’re lying to us just as much in thousands of stories every year that garner less attention. And they wonder why their circulations/ratings are in freefall and no one trusts them anymore…

    Patterico has more on the subject.

    (Hat tip: Instapundit)