Posts Tagged ‘Nanny State’

Today’s Most infuriating Quote

Tuesday, September 17th, 2013

Via Dwight comes a link to this Jonathan Chait piece in New York magazine. Which contained this gem of prevarication:

Bloomberg’s health crusade is so unusual because it embraces a political mode usually associated with the right. Conservatives favor regulation of vice and personal behavior, especially related to sex, because they believe that the state has a legitimate role in shaping the culture. Traditional social values, they believe, undergird stable families and a well-functioning community. Liberals traditionally want to remove the government from regulating personal behavior and to deploy it only in the economic realm.

That quote might have had some nodding relationship to reality in, oh, 1980 or so. But it’s certainly not conservatives who have been pushing to:

  • Ban civilian firearms ownership
  • Increase tobacco taxes
  • Ban incandescent light bulbs
  • Force Catholics to pay for abortions
  • Ban “high flow” toilets
  • Ban “hate speech”
  • Ban plastic bags
  • Ban transfats
  • Ban crosses and managers on public land
  • Ban liquor stores in black neighborhoods
  • Ban talk radio
  • Ban government use of the word “Christmas”
  • Ban SUVs, or any other vehicle that get insufficiently “virtuous” gas mileage
  • Ban genetically modified foods
  • Ban foie gras
  • And don’t forget that the “War on Drugs” was an extremely bipartisan affair, with Hubert Humphrey, Joe Biden and Tip O’Neil all among its enthusiastic backers.
  • Etc.
  • This poster makes many of the same points:

    The idea that modern (as opposed to classical) liberals “want to remove the government from regulating personal behavior” is a naked, vainglorious, self-flattering lie on Chait’s part, and only someone living in the coastal Liberal Reality Bubble could possibly type it with a straight face.

    Bloomberg Fails to Learn From History (Again)

    Wednesday, March 27th, 2013

    Nurse Bloomberg proposes the Mafia Fulltime Employment Through Cigarette Smuggling Act (though I think he’s offering it up under another name) to raise the price of cigarettes to $10.50 a pack. (Hat tip: Dwight)

    And how well is that likely to work? “New York currently holds the top position as the highest net importer of smuggled cigarettes in 2011, with smuggled cigarettes totaling a staggering 60.9 percent of the total market. Not coincidentally, New York also has the nation’s highest state cigarette tax.”

    You would think even Nanny State advocates might have learned from the example of Prohibition, but obviously not. It’s like Bloomberg watched The Untouchables and went “Hey, Al Capone! I bet I can boost that guy’s profits through the roof!” That is, when the smuggling isn’t funding jihad.

    If Bloomberg is successful in getting this enacted, cigarette vendors in New Jersey should send him a nice thank you basket…

    City of Austin: How dare you do what you want with your own land?

    Friday, June 11th, 2010

    Once again the City of Austin is living up to its reputation as a Nanny State busybody who can’t keep its nose out of other people’s business. In this case it’s decided that Joe Del Rio can’t dig under his own house.

    Joe Del Rio, the retiree who excavated a huge pit underneath his East Austin home that prompted a raid by SWAT and bomb squad officers last month, is suing the city for taking his private property by filling in the hole, his lawyer said Thursday.

    Earlier this week, Austin city officials had ordered the collection of tunnels and rooms, which they have characterized as a 35-foot-deep multilevel underground structure, filled with concrete to prevent Del Rio’s house from collapsing. Work crews for a private contractor were scheduled to begin filling in the underground space this morning, which officials said would take about 33 truckloads of concrete.

    A spokeswoman for the Public Works Department said the estimated cost of filling Del Rio’s pit is about $61,500. The city will pay for the work and then bill Del Rio, Sara Hartley said.

    In a mid-May report, city engineers, citing deep excavation under load-bearing walls and scant reinforcement of walls in the pit, declared that Del Rio’s home was “in imminent danger of collapse.”

    Demolishing the home, they said in the report, would almost certainly cause a cave-in, so filling in the pit was the only option.

    Here’s a Google Street View of the House.

    There are also pictures, but they offer a considerably less-than-comprehensive view. (Notice how the photos from the City of Austin Code Compliance Department are carefully chosen not to give you a good idea of the layout of the space, but to make it look as ugly and haphazard as possible.)

    Note that nowhere in the article does it say that Mr. Del Rio’s house is a danger to anyone but Mr. Del Rio himself. So the City of Austin comes in with guns drawn, seizes the man’s house, and is about to spend $61,000 and bill Del Rio to perform work he doesn’t want to save him from himself.

    I’m not saying that Del Rio’s excavations were necessarily the smartest move in the world, and I’m not advocating people go out of their way to flaunt building codes. But government exists to protect citizens from being victimized by others, not to protect people from themselves. Unless Mr. Del Rio’s actions are a danger to others (say, if he was undermining a city street), the City of Austin should leave him the hell alone.

    (Hat tip: Fark.)

    Big Brother Ontario Bans Crystal Head Vodka

    Sunday, May 23rd, 2010

    Ontario is banning Dan Aykroyd’s Crystal Head Vodka. Why? Because the bottle is shaped like a skull. Which is precisely the reason I bought Dwight a bottle of it for his birthday. I guess with the Tories in power in the UK, Canadians are hoping to win back the “Most Absurd Nanny State Law” crown.

    Let’s hope nobody tells them about Halloween…

    (Hat Tip: Instapundit.)