Evidence continues to pile up that Democrats stole four states through brazen election fraud in a small number of urban counties. Here’s my attempt to wrangle this fire hose of information into some coherent form: <\/p>\n
A few days earlier, Giuliani said that the Trump campaign may have sufficient evidence to change the election results in the state of Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n
He told Fox News\u2019 Maria Bartiromo on Sunday that lawsuits being filed by Trump\u2019s reelection campaign might show that as many as 900,000 invalid ballots were cast in the battleground state.<\/p>\n
According to an unofficial vote count from the Pennsylvania Department of State, Biden has received 3.35 million votes to Trump\u2019s 3.31 million votes. Percentage-wise, Biden has 49.7 percent, compared to Trump\u2019s 49.1 percent.<\/p>\n
\u201cI think we have enough to change Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania election was a disaster,\u201d Giuliani said, responding to a question from the host about whether the evidence is enough to change the fate of the presidential election.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have people that observed people being pushed out of the polling place. We have people who were suggested to vote the other way and shown how to do it. I\u2019m giving you the big picture,\u201d he said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
While mail-in ballots were being counted, GOP Pittsburgh observers were \u201ckept out of the room or kept away from the room\u201d for a period of 24 hours, Giuliani alleged.<\/p>\n
\u201cEven though we went to court and we were allowed to move six feet closer, the Democrat machine people moved the counting place six feet further away. This is documented on videotape. There are upwards of 50 witnesses,\u201d he continued.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Analysis of Pennsylvania data shows clear evidence of election fraud<\/a>:
\nYou’ll notice that after the 11\/4\/20 23:00Z cutoff time, only swings of Biden votes (in multiples of 6,000 at a time) seem to have been received.<\/p>\n
Statistically, these changes make no sense. They’re not just improbable, they appear to be impossible.<\/p>\n
It looks to me like bundles of around 6,000 votes were used to slowly overcome any Trump lead. The correlation is uncanny.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
More on the same theme<\/a>.\n Chuck DeVore says that irregularities justify recounts<\/a>:
\n\u201cIf the local elections officials in the city of Philadelphia are so confident that they have enough valid votes to beat President Donald Trump, and assign the 20 electoral college votes of Pennsylvania to Vice President Joe Biden. If they were that confident, why are they resisting an authorized court order to allow for people to observe the ballot as they\u2019re supposed to legally be able to do?\u201d DeVore responded to a question from correspondent Jan Jekielek.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Snip.<\/p>\n
\u201cBy the way, this is a common thing throughout the entire country, that you\u2019re supposed to have people from both sides observing the physical process of counting the votes to make sure that it\u2019s done honestly and legally,\u201d DeVore added, \u201cit really potentially puts into doubt the results that came out of Philadelphia.\u201d<\/p>\n
DeVore pointed out that only a few months ago, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted a Philadelphia election official on charges of bribery and election tampering.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen you have a race or a state like Pennsylvania, where you have this unprecedentedly large number of mail-in ballots that have been requested, then the question becomes what sort of safeguards are we using to ensure that the votes are valid and have been legally cast?\u201d DeVore spoke about the integrity of the mail-in ballots.<\/p>\n
DeVore went on to say that one of the safeguards\u2014the requirement to have a matching signature on the outside of the envelope\u2014was obliterated in Pennsylvania.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Judicial Watch in October: “Pennsylvania Counties Admit They Gave Incorrect Voter Roll Information to Federal Government \u2013 Disclose Conflicting Numbers of Inactive Voters to Court<\/a>.”\n The statistical anomalies<\/a> of those fraudulent Biden ballots in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin<\/a>.\n “Massive Voter Fraud In Wisconsin<\/a>?”
\nThere were 3,684,726 registered voters in Wisconsin going into Election day. The total votes recorded in Wisconsin were 3,240,549. That would give Wisconsin a turnout of 88%. [UPDATE: The current vote total is 3,297,420, which would yield a turnout of over 89%. However, Wisconsin permits same-day registration, so the number of such registrations would bring that percentage down somewhat.] According to Ballotpedia, no American state in the period 2002-2018 has ever achieved a turnout rate of 80% or higher. [UPDATE: These are turnout numbers expressed as percentage of eligible voters, not registered voters, so the percentages are not directly comparable.] For purposes of comparison, in 2016 Wisconsin had a 67 percent turnout rate. [UPDATE: Wisconsin tabulates turnout as a percentage of the estimated voting-age population, so these numbers would be lower than the percentages of registered voters.] If you are credulous, you can believe that 21% more Wisconsinites voted this year, compared with the red-hot election of four years ago, and 248,000 more Wisconsinites turned out to vote for the charismatic Joe Biden this year than voted for Hillary Clinton four years ago. I think those numbers are almost certainly false, the result of ballot manipulation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
“Michigan Election Fraud<\/a>: Evidence of Wolverine State Chicanery During America\u2019s 2020 Presidential Election.”
\nOn Election Night when America went to bed, President Trump had a commanding lead in virtually every swing state, as well as Virginia, which no one expected him to win.<\/p>\n
However, when America woke up the next day, we found that he\u2019d lost these leads, largely on the basis of mail-in ballots found in the middle of the night and out from under the watchful eye of legal election monitors. <\/p>\n
What\u2019s more, these massive caches of votes \u2013 almost all of which were for former Vice President Biden \u2013 came via large dumps primarily from the five aforementioned cities in states predominantly run by Democratic governors.<\/p>\n
When one looks at the statistical likelihood of the reported turnout, the numbers are so improbable they\u2019re more at home in a one-party state like Saddam Hussein\u2019s Iraq or North Korea.<\/p>\n
What\u2019s more, Biden\u2019s victory does not square with the results of the Republican Party nationally: Republicans won 28 of 29 competitive House seats and Democrats were unable to flip a single state legislature. Joe Biden secured a scant three of the so-called \u201cBellwether Districts\u201d that almost always choose the winner, one of which was in Delaware. Judicial Watch found 353 counties in 29 different states who had higher than 100 percent turnout. <\/p>\n
Anecdotally, swing states tend to follow Florida in terms of swinging left or right. This is particularly true in Michigan, which has voted in lockstep with Florida since 1968. Nearly three dozen states had counting machines connected to the Internet during the election, which is inherently insecure. Joe Biden\u2019s lead among mail-in ballots was massive in two states \u2014 Michigan and Pennsylvania \u2014 while it was in the single digits in most states.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Snip.<\/p>\n
Michigan might take the dubious honor of having the most corrupt elections in America in 2020. As of November 9, the FBI has opened up two investigations into voter fraud in the state. Affidavits have been filed alleging a scheme to backdate mail-in ballots. It is the land of massive vote dumps that go 100 percent for Joe Biden (which the controlled media has attempted to retcon as a \u201cglitch\u201d or \u201cclerical error\u201d), of thousands of dead people voting, of United States Postal Service officials coercing postal employees into backdating the postmark on ballots. And, of course, remember that this is the state that was shut down by executive fiat by Gretchen Whitmer, who eventually had her executive overreach invalidated by the state Supreme Court. <\/p>\n
A single computer \u201cglitch\u201d awarded 6,000 votes to Biden and the Democrats that were supposed to go to President Trump and other Republican candidates. With 47 Michigan counties using this software, similar glitches might yield a discrepancy of hundreds of thousands of ballots \u2014 or even more. Perhaps this \u201cglitch\u201d was one of the more innocuous ones. Another glitch returned a Republican incumbent to office after he \u201clost\u201d to his Democratic challenger. <\/p>\n
We use \u201cglitch\u201d in quotes because these types of things seem to be a running pattern in the state and appear to always benefit the Democrat candidate. One other, and far more important, example of this was the \u201cglitch\u201d that awarded 138,000-plus votes to Joe Biden. It was one of these monolithic vote dumps we keep talking about.<\/p>\n
Over 138,000 votes tabulated and not a single one of them went for the President (or, for that matter, Jo Jorgensen or Howie Hawkins or Kanye West), a statistical impossibility. It was later corrected when hordes of Internet denizens found the vote dump and wondered how it was possible, even under the basic laws of statistics. <\/p>\n
This is hardly the only example of \u201cmistakes\u201d benefitting Biden or suspicious reported totals in the State of Michigan. Take, for example, Antrim County, where President Trump beat Hillary Clinton by 30 points in 2016 but had now swung back to Biden by 29 points. County officials vowed to investigate what they called \u201cskewed\u201d results. <\/p>\n
Even prior to the 2020 election back in October, city officials in Muskegon found that there were registration irregularities. <\/p>\n
A suit has been filed in the state of Michigan based on a sworn affidavit from a Michigan poll worker \u2014 not an observer. Among other things, this suit alleges that poll workers processed ballots with missing signatures, coached voters on who to vote for (Joe Biden), and were instructed to backdate ballots. <\/p>\n
How deep is the rabbit hole of \u201ccomputer error\u201d in Michigan? Sidney Powell, counsel for one General Michael Flynn, appeared on Lou Dobbs\u2019 Fox Business News program and explained that she believes that programs like HAMMER or SCORECARD were used to change as much as 3 percent of the result. While this is merely speculation at this point, it is worth noting that Steve Bannon also floated this possibility on his show, War Room. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n
“Administrative policies in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question<\/a>. From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials have taken actions that were not authorized by legislature.”
\nRecords reviewed by Just the News show that an executive branch agency called the Wisconsin Elections Commission:<\/p>\n
\n
- permits local county election clerks to cure spoiled ballots by filling in missing addresses for witnesses even though state law invalidates any ballot without a witness address.\n
- exempted as many as 200,000 citizens from voter ID rules in 2020 by allowing them to claim the COVID-19 pandemic caused them to be “indefinitely confined.”\n
- failed this year to purge 130,000 names from outdated voter rolls as required by law.<\/ol>\n<\/blockquote>\n
(Hat tip: John Solomon<\/a>.)<\/p>\n
- “Great Lakes Justice Center Files Election Crimes Lawsuit<\/a>.”
\nThe Great Lakes Justice Law Center is filing a new election crimes lawsuit in Wayne County Circuit Court. The Lansing area law firm is representing two Detroit area residents in the action. The suit charges Wayne County elections officials knowingly allowed and supported illegal activities surrounding the Tuesday general election. The suit in Wayne County Circuit Court is asking for an entirely new election to be staged for the county.<\/p>\n
Lead attorney David Kallman says numerous witnesses are filing swarm affidavits under oath supporting the claims in the lawsuit. The suit spells out a number of alleged election crimes. Many of them surround the use of absentee or mail-in ballots.
\nThey include:<\/p>\n-Validating ballots the name showing on the ballot did not appear in the official voter database.
\n-Election workers were ordered to not verify voters\u2019 signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process invalid ballots.
\n-The suit claims election workers processed ballots that appeared after the election deadline and falsely reported those ballots had been received prior to the election evening deadline.
\n-And the suit claims many of the invalid ballots won\u2019t be hard to pinpoint, saying election workers in Wayne County altered already illegal ballots by inserting a birthdate of 1\/1\/1900.<\/p>\nAttorney Kallman says the lawsuit asks the Circuit court to immediately void the uncertified election results in Wayne County and order a new and fully monitored election at the earliest possible date. \u201cThis type of widespread fraud in the counting and processing of voter ballots cannot be allowed to stand. Michigan citizens are entitled to know that their elections are conducted in a fair and legal manner and that every legal vote is properly counted. Such rampant fraud cannot be undone. We ask the Court to enjoin the certification of this fraudulent election, void the election, and order a new vote in Wayne County.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\ufeff<\/p>\n
- Sharyl Attkisson has more details<\/a> on the lawsuit:
\nDefendants systematically processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets. When a voter\u2019s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted. Defendants instructed election workers to not verify signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process such ballots regardless of their validity. After election officials announced the last absentee ballots had been received, another batch of unsecured and unsealed ballots, without envelopes, arrived in trays at the TCF Center. There were tens of thousands of these absentee ballots, and apparently every ballot was counted and attributed only to Democratic candidates. Defendants instructed election workers to process ballots that appeared after the election deadline and to falsely report that those ballots had been received prior to November 3, 2020 deadline.<\/p>\n
Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots, such as using incorrect or false birthdays. Many times, the election workers inserted new names into the QVF after the election and recorded these new voters as having a birthdate of 1\/1\/1900.<\/p>\n
On a daily basis leading up to the election, City of Detroit election workers and employees coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. These workers and employees encouraged voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. These election workers and employees went over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.<\/p>\n
Unsecured ballots arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes.<\/p>\n
Defendant election officials and workers refused to record challenges to their processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced a challenge. After poll challengers started discovering the fraud taking place at the TCF Center, Defendant election officials and workers locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots were processed.<\/p>\n
Defendant election officials and workers allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate. In fact, election officials and workers repeatedly obstructed poll challengers from observing. Defendants permitted thousands of ballots to be filled out by hand and duplicated on site without oversight from poll challengers.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
- Unfortunately, Wayne County circuit judge Timothy Kenny refused to issue an injunction<\/a>. Great Lakes Justice Center is appealing.\n
- President Trump’s plans to defeat the cheats<\/a>:
\nDemocrats are stealing the election in Michigan and Pennsylvania. This bothered the heck out of many people because it seems as if nothing can be done to stop them. In Michigan, people born before the Civil War voted. In Philadelphia, Democrats ignored a court order to let Republicans observe the voting. Those are just two of the many irregularities.<\/p>\n
Republican Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, told NBC his state’s Supreme Court “went rogue and decided to violate the U.S. Constitution, ignore Pennsylvania law, and just rewrite the law themselves.<\/p>\n
“In Pennsylvania, unfortunately, it’s been a little bit complicated by a Pennsylvania Supreme Court that went rogue and decided to violate the U.S. constitution, ignore Pennsylvania law, and just rewrite the law themselves. <\/p>\n
“They have no authority to do that. And they extended the period of time over which ballots can arrive beyond the deadline. That’s outrageous, frankly.”<\/p>\n
Some people are banking on state legislatures overturning election. Perhaps they can.<\/p>\n
Forget recounts. The same people who counted the votes the first time will count them again.<\/p>\n
Biden declared victory on Saturday night.<\/p>\n
Big mistake.<\/p>\n
Democrats took the bait. Now President Trump can go to the Supreme Court and have the elections in Michigan and Pennsylvania declared invalid. Without those Electoral College votes, Biden fails to reach 270 and the election gets thrown into the House.<\/p>\n
Other states also may be invalidated. The Supreme Court will decide, and I believe President Trump has 5 votes and Chief Justice John McCain Roberts has only 4.<\/p>\n
Ignoring a federal judge’s order is never a good idea when you are stealing an election.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
- Georgia:
\n\nNo one disputes that Fulton County elections officials falsely announced that the counting of ballots would stop at 10:30 p.m. No one disputes that Fulton County elected officials unlawfully resumed the counting of ballots after our observers left the center.<\/p>\n
— David Shafer (@DavidShafer) November 10, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n