Someone at Slashdot seems to be pushing the “Russia supplied Wikileaks with the DNC hack info” theory as fact, even though it remains unproven. We’ve been hearing this supposition for over two years from Democrats and their media enablers who still can’t bring themselves to believe the obvious truth that Hillary Clinton was a horribly corrupt and demonstratively incompetent candidate.
Anyone could have hacked the DNC, just like anyone could have hacked Hillary Clinton’s illegal homebrew email server. It could have been the Russians, who regularly undertake malicious activity. But it could also be China, or a leak from within the DNC, or the Awan spy ring, who had access to DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schulz’s computers and tablets, as well as those of some 40 other House Democrats.
But the Russia theory is pushed above all because that’s the one that fuels Democratic activist outrage and the “Russian collusion” fantasy the mainstream media has spent two years pushing. Which is why we get a piece from the hard-left Daily Beast on the front page of Slashdot.
But to quote another hard-left outlet, The Nation, about the DNC hack:
This journalistic mission led The Nation to be troubled by the paucity of serious public scrutiny of the January 2017 intelligence-community assessment (ICA) on purported Russian interference in our 2016 presidential election, which reflects the judgment of the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA. That report concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally ordered the hacking of the DNC and the dissemination of e-mails from key staffers via WikiLeaks, in order to damage Hillary Clinton’s candidacy. This official intelligence assessment has since led to what some call “Russiagate,” with charges and investigations of alleged collusion with the Kremlin, and, in turn, to what is now a major American domestic political crisis and an increasingly perilous state of US-Russia relations. To this day, however, the intelligence agencies that released this assessment have failed to provide the American people with any actual evidence substantiating their claims about how the DNC material was obtained or by whom. Astonishingly and often overlooked, the authors of the declassified ICA themselves admit that their “judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact.”
But the Democratic Media Complex will still push the “Russia hacked the DNC!” talking point out out of political necessity. Anything to maintain the mass hysteria bubble.
/Cue up the cries of “Russian bot” in 5…4…3…
Tags: Abid Awan, Democrats, DNC, Hillary Clinton Scandals, Imran Awan, Jamal Awan, Media Watch, Russia, Slashdot, Wikileaks
The fact remains that it was Seth Rich who copied Podesta’s emails on a USB stick and forwarded that to WikiLeaks. None other than Craig Murray – UK ambassador who was the middle man in this endeavor.
Seth Rich was an insider but also a Sanders supporter. He observed how the primaries were rigged against Sanders ergo revenge to expose the corrupt HRC campaign.
Have you noticed that not once the content of these emails were questioned? On the other hand we learned quite a bit about the pay-to-play by Hillary while SOS.
Keep in mind that CrowdStrike unmasked Seth Rich as the leaker. He was murdered by a MS13 hit squad hired by Wasserman Schulz and Podesta. There is the email by Podesta where he stated to make an example out of the leaker of these emails.
Strangely enough these two MS13 gang members were also found murdered not far from the Seth Rich attempted murder location.
Seth Rich did not die from the gun shot wounds. A doc from the emergency room anonymously informed the anons on the 4chan board that Seth was not in danger and surgery removing the bullets was successful.
This doc also reported that the morning after Seth was admitted the hospital wing was ‘swarmed by men in black suits’ that also prevented her from caring for Seth Rich.
She reported that Seth Rich was dead one hour after these agents swarmed the wing of the hospital were Seth Rich was.
Make what you will but numerous individuals knowledgeable in the field of computing reported that the WikiLeaks expose could only come from an insider of the DNC.
Have you ever wondered why nobody from the DNC or HRC campaign ever addressed the murder of their employee Seth Rich?