Pretty much everyone outside the Democratic Media Complex realizes that the Hillary Clinton campaign conspired with deep state operatives to jam Donald Trump at the line, but new revelations show that the Russigate/dossier/FISAgate scandal wasn’t the worst thing they did by a long shot.
Special counsel John Durham’s team alleged on Feb. 12 that a tech executive aligned with the Democratic Party was paid to spy on former President Donald Trump’s residences and the White House when Trump was president.
Lawyers for the Clinton campaign allegedly paid the technology executive to infiltrate servers at the Trump Tower and the White House, Durham said in court filings, in order to establish an “inference” and “narrative” to tie Trump to the Russian government. Durham’s office made the claim as part of his investigation that had brought charges against Michael Sussmann, a lawyer who had worked on behalf of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and who is currently charged with making a false statement to the FBI.
Durham alleged Sussmann “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign,” according to a section in the court filing, titled “Factual Background.”
Billing records he obtained suggest that Sussmann “repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations” and that the unnamed technology executive met and communicate with Mark Elias, a left-wing lawyer and operative who has filed numerous election-related lawsuits on behalf of the Democrats. Sussman previously pleaded not guilty and accused Durham of acting in a politically motivated manner.
“Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract,” Durham’s filing states.
The executive also “tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia,” the filing states, adding that the technology firm that the executive worked for “had come to access and maintain dedicated servers” for Trump’s executive office.
(Hat tip: Director Blue.)
So the Clinton campaign was paying to violate wiretapping and electronic privacy laws to spy on a sitting U.S. President. I don’t think I can even add up all the laws that were broken here.
If Richard Nixon tried such a stunt he’d never have gotten pardoned.
Some tweets:
The FBI let the DNC hire a contractor and investigate their own servers
Who chose that firm?
Michael Sussman
The firm was Crowdstrike
— Honkmaster Poso 🎺 (@JackPosobiec) February 14, 2022
Yes, Hillary Clinton spied on Donald Trump — while he was president
This is crazy stuff.@KayleeDMcGhee for @dcexaminer:https://t.co/iBgYHtGkpT
— Brad Polumbo 🇺🇸⚽️ 🏳️🌈 (@brad_polumbo) February 14, 2022
They never thought he’d win. They never thought we’d find out. Trump won and we know they spied on him and stole 2020.
— Josh Barnett for Congress (AZ-01) (@BarnettforAZ) February 13, 2022
The Clinton campaign paid people to create a fake narrative to initiate an investigation that wasted millions of taxpayer dollars – with the sole intent of unseating a sitting President.
The entire Democrat party was complicit. Now it looks like we can finally prove it. https://t.co/IwE67YmmSp
— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) February 13, 2022
— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) February 13, 2022
Tags: 2016 Presidential Race, Crime, Crowdstrike, Democratic National Committee, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton Scandals, John Durham, Mark Elias, Michael Sussmann, spying
None of this matters if people don’t go to jail, from Sussman to Clinton and downward. All of them, jail time.
Otherwise, it’s just talk, and no one in the future will be deterred.
Now it is even more clear why Clinton refused to concede and drank herself into a stupor. She KNEW what she had done, and she also realized that one day it would likely all come crashing down.
We?
They got too greedy and revealed themselves as greedy, venal, Overlords of the New Fiefdom. Gotham ain’t got shit on Washington for a dark underworld.
I agree with Michael HIteshew, but try them and hang them for treason first.
The cry from the Hildebeast will be, “Overzealous Underlings!!!”. Where have we heard this before. Granny Mao Jacket will escape untouched to return to her chardonnay box.
No one of any importance will even be indicted.
Reprecht – it wouldn’t be treason. It would be sedition.
“If that f***ing bastard wins we will all hang from nooses”
Hang for what exactly?
Now we know.
[…] and she’s always been guilty of what she “didn’t know”. See here: https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=50595 Post Views: 0 CategoriesGeneral […]