Posts Tagged ‘Cameron Abrams’

Trump (Inexplicably?) Pardons Henry Cuellar

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2025

Though Trump47 has been a powerhouse of a Republican President, unleashing vast amounts of good and doing everything he can to roll back the leftwing madness of the Biden Administration, every now and then he does something that leaves me scratching my head. The 50-year mortgage and “hey, let’s import tons of Chinese students” trial balloons are two examples. Well, he just dropped another, pardoning indicted Texas Democratic congressman Henry Cuellar and his wife in advance of his bribery trial.

President Donald Trump has pardoned embattled U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX-28) following an ongoing legal battle involving the congressman, his wife, political consultants, and a number of foreign governments.

In a social media post, Trump alleged the Biden administration “weaponized the Justice System against their Political Opponents” like Cuellar.

“Sleepy Joe went after the Congressman, and even the Congressman’s wonderful wife, Imelda, simply for speaking the TRUTH,” Trump wrote.

The president said that Cuellar “spoke out against Open Borders” and that the previous administration would “attack, rob, lie, cheat, destroy, and decimate anyone who dares to oppose their Far Left Agenda, an Agenda that, if left unchecked, will obliterate our magnificent Country.”

My working assumption has been that these political calculations may indeed be why the Biden Administration charged Cuellar…but that he was probably guilty as well.

“Because of these facts, and others,” Trump explains, “I am hereby announcing my full and unconditional PARDON of beloved Texas Congressman Henry Cuellar, and Imelda.”

Snip.

Their case stems from allegations of payments received from foreign entities, including an oil and gas company controlled by the government of Azerbaijan and a bank based in Mexico. The bribes are alleged to total approximately $600,000.

Cuellar has represented Texas’ 28th Congressional District since 2005. But in 2022, allegations of misconduct involving him gained prominence following raids on his residence and campaign office by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The couple was accused of allegedly laundering the money through “sham consulting contracts,” using “front companies and middlemen to funnel it into shell companies” owned by Cuellar’s wife.

It was reported in July that the U.S. Department of Justice was planning on going forward with its case against the congressman. But earlier in the year, Trump and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi issued directives that limited the extent of enforcement of foreign bribery and lobbying laws.

I can’t say that I see limiting “enforcement of foreign bribery and lobbying laws” as a good thing.

Trump usually has reasons for doing something, even when it’s not apparent at first. Some possibilities,

  1. Trump actually believes Cuellar to be innocent. Maybe he has access to exonerating evidence that I don’t.
  2. Maybe Trump feels (probably correctly) that politically Cuellar is toast anyway, since his district was one of the ones recently redistricted in the special session. Maybe the pardon will allow Cuellar to dish dirt on just how Democrats decided to flood the country with illegal aliens, or how they use them to commit voter fraud. The private email and memo possibilities are endless…
  3. Maybe the pardon taints Cuellar with the Democrat base far more than the bribery charges did. According to Ballotpedia, he already has two primary challengers in Ryan Trevino and Ricardo Villarreal. Maybe the calculation is that the pardon actually weakens Cuellar, making the district flip just that much more likely.
  4. Maybe he expects Cuellar to change parties, balancing out the loss of Marjorie Taylor Greene, to add a little margin for the GOP-led House.
  5. Maybe he’s just doing it for the lulz, or to make Democrats even more paranoid than they are.
  6. This is all speculation. But just because it’s something I wouldn’t have done doesn’t mean President Trump doesn’t have his reasons…

Abbott Comes Out Swinging Against Jihad

Thursday, November 20th, 2025

EPIC City may have turned out to be mostly (not entirely) a nothingburger, more a prosaic speculative land deal than an actual Islamic City, but it seems to have lit a fire under Greg Abbott, as he’s come out swinging against any opportunity for Jihad to take root in Texas this week.

First up: He designated CAIR and the BrandonMuslim Brotherhood as foreign terrorist organizations.

Gov. Greg Abbott has officially designated both the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Brotherhood as foreign terrorist organizations and transnational criminal organizations.

The move immediately prohibits the groups from purchasing or acquiring land in Texas and authorizes the state to take legal action to shut down their operations.

The designation is the first significant use of authority granted to the governor under Senate Bill 17, a land-security measure Abbott signed into law earlier this year.

SB 17 allows the governor, after consultation with the Department of Public Safety, to classify any foreign group or transnational criminal organization as a prohibited entity. Once designated, those organizations—and their affiliates—are barred from acquiring real property in Texas and become subject to aggressive enforcement by the attorney general.

“The Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have long made their goals clear: to forcibly impose Sharia law and establish Islam’s ‘mastership of the world,’” said Abbott. “The actions taken by the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR to support terrorism across the globe and subvert our laws through violence, intimidation, and harassment are unacceptable.”

The astonishing thing here is not only Abbott declaring an obvious truth loudly and clearly, but that the actual declaration goes even harder without even a single ritual bow to mealy-mouthed, politically correct wokespeak on the issue, and I’d quote great walloping bits of it if it weren’t an uncopyable PDF.

Back to Texas Scorecard.

Under SB 17, the Texas attorney general is empowered to investigate any property transactions involving prohibited entities, bring actions against land they attempt to acquire, seek court-ordered divestiture, and pursue civil penalties of up to 50 percent of the property’s market value. Courts are required to appoint receivers to sell off any land improperly purchased.

Abbott’s proclamation also designates both CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood as foreign terrorist organizations, enabling the state to pursue injunctions and penalties under Texas’ anti-gang and anti-terrorism laws.

The declaration follows years of concern from national security officials and law enforcement. CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in United States v. Holy Land Foundation, the largest terrorism financing case in U.S. history. The FBI severed formal ties with CAIR in 2008.

Earlier this year, Republican Party of Texas leaders overwhelmingly approved a resolution denouncing CAIR as an “ideological threat,” citing its connections to Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, and individuals convicted of terrorism-related offenses.

The party warned that CAIR promotes policies “incompatible with Texas law,” works to impose Sharia-aligned standards in public institutions, and attempts to suppress constitutionally protected speech by labeling dissent as “Islamophobia.”

The governor’s action also comes amid heightened public scrutiny over Islamist influence in Texas.

You may remember CAIR from such hits as “We stole $7 million in taxpayer money” (thanks, Gavin Newsom). You may remember the Muslim Brotherhood from such hits as “Boy, we sure do have a lot of ties to the Clinton family” and “We Tried To Turn Egypt Into An Islamic Republic And All We Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt.” Both have, at the very least, played footsie with Islamic terrorists for their entire existence, as shown by the Holy land Foundation links, and CAIR seems to be a direct cash pipeline to Hamas. Both deserve the terrorist org tag.

But Abbott wasn’t finished! He also declared the State of Texas was investigating a Sharia Law Islamic Tribunal in Dallas.

ov. Greg Abbott is calling for investigations into “entities purporting to illegally enforce Sharia law in Texas.”

In a letter issued Wednesday, Abbott details entities in Collin and Dallas counties that “may be masquerading as legal ‘courts’ staffed with ‘judges’ issuing orders that purportedly carry the authority to bind individuals to Islamic codes, thereby preempting state and federal laws.”

Abbott identified the Islamic Tribunal in Dallas, which he said “purports to exercise jurisdiction over all aspects of life—even over non-ecclesiastical legal disputes—and to subject them to ‘Islamic Jurisprudence and its Shari’ah or Law.’”

The Islamic Tribunal has operated since at least 2015.

The organization’s website states that “there is no secularism or detachment from the tenets of faith and all Islamic injunctions in regards to the legal field” and that “problems within American Muslim society may range from personal and family matters such as marriage and divorce, as well as disputes among community members and those in positions of leadership.”

The website continues, “It is with this issue that Muslims here in America are obligated to find a way to solve conflicts and disputes according to the principles of Islamic Law and its legal heritage of fairness and justice in a manner that is reasonable and cost effective. These proceedings must be conducted in accordance with the law of the land; local, state and federal within the United States. Through effective mediation and arbitration, decisions can be made that are stipulated in the Shari’ah and adhering to the binding, ethical and legal code that exists within this country with the final approval of the relevant courts and judges.”

The website goes on to state that the Islamic Tribunal was “established for this purpose. The Islamic Tribunal is a unique institution of its kind in the United States of America. It is the intention of erecting this institution in order to set a precedence that will be emulated and duplicated throughout the country.”

It also adds a “general disclaimer” that it “does not provide legal advice and the Islamic Tribunal is not a law firm. None of our members are lawyers and they also do not provide legal advice.”

Abbott addressed the letter to district attorneys and sheriffs in both Dallas and Collin counties, in addition to Attorney General Ken Paxton and Texas Department of Public Safety Director Freeman Martin.

“Legal disputes in Texas must be decided based on American law rooted in the fundamental principles of American due process, not according to Sharia law dispensed in modern day star chambers,” the governor said.

Indeed.

People outside Texas may not remember it, but a few years ago, a lot of Texas conservatives thought Abbott was too much a cautious, consensus-driven squish of a Republican governor. Somewhere between the Biden border invasion and the Straus-Phalen Cabal thwarting school choice and property tax reform for the umpteenth time, Abbott seemed to morph into a real fire-breather of a conservative.

Between him and Paxton, neither are going to let jihadism take root in Texas if they have anything to say about it.

Paxton Wrests $1.375 Billion From Google

Tuesday, May 13th, 2025

More good news out of the Texas Attorney General’s office: He just compelled Google to cough up $1.375 billion to settle a lawsuit over illegally using biometric data.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s 2022 accusation that Google collected “very sensitive information like biometric identifiers” has culminated in a $1.375 billion settlement from the tech company.

“In Texas, Big Tech is not above the law. For years, Google secretly tracked people’s movements, private searches, and even their voiceprints and facial geometry through their products and services. I fought back and won,” Paxton wrote in a statement released on Friday.

“This $1.375 billion settlement is a major win for Texans’ privacy and tells companies that they will pay for abusing our trust. I will always protect Texans by stopping Big Tech’s attempts to make a profit by selling away our rights and freedoms.”

The settlement is the conclusion of two separate lawsuits against Google.

“This settles a raft of old claims, many of which have already been resolved elsewhere, concerning product policies we have long since changed,” José Castañeda, a Google spokesperson, told Reuters in a statement.

“We are pleased to put them behind us, and we will continue to build robust privacy controls into our services.”

Paxton notes in the announcement that no state has yet secured a data privacy settlement exceeding $93 million from Google for similar violations. “Even a multistate coalition that included forty states secured just $391 million — almost a billion dollars less than Texas’s recovery.”

This Google settlement comes less than a year after Paxton also announced a $1.4 billion settlement with Meta, the parent company of Facebook, following allegations it had collected Texans’ biometric identifiers without their consent.

In 2023, Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law House Bill (HB) 4, otherwise known as the Texas Data and Privacy Security Act (TDPSA).

The act establishes a set of rights for internet users over their personal data, including the ability to access, correct, delete, and block its sale, while protecting users from discrimination for exercising these rights.

Once you get up into the billion dollar range, that’s a lot of cheddar even for one of the world’s largest multinational tech companies. What a settlement this large tells me is that Google is guilty as sin and they’re terrified of trial discovery. Indeed, I’d put money on them engaging in other shady practices that contravene Texas law.

One wonders just what other sins Google intends the settlement to absolve…

NYSE Chicago Moving To Dallas

Sunday, February 16th, 2025

The New York Stock Exchange Company is moving operations for the Chicago Stock Exchange (which it’s owned since 2018) to Dallas.

The Lone Star State has long been a magnet for capital investment, and recent developments regarding the establishment of not one, but two Texas-based stock exchanges seek to increase that momentum.

The Texas Stock Exchange (TXSE), set to be based in Dallas, was announced in June last year on the principle that “Texas and the other states in the southeast quadrant have become economic powerhouses,” according to TXSE founder James Lee.

“Combined with the demand we are seeing from investors and corporations for expanded alternatives to trade and list equities, this is an opportune time to build a major, national stock exchange in Texas.”

The first step to full incorporation was taken in January when registration forms were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission — after $161 million in initial capital was raised by the TXSE group.

Former Texas governor and U.S. Department of Energy secretary Rick Perry, former acting general counsel for Charles Schwab and former head of its Office of Legislative and Regulatory Affairs Jeffrey Brown, and former KCG Holdings, Inc. chief technology officer Jonathan Ross, are some of the members on the TXSE leadership team.

Now, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has announced plans to establish its own exchange in Dallas, which could be a competitor to the TXSE.

“As the state with the largest number of NYSE listings, representing over $3.7 trillion in market value for our community, Texas is a market leader in fostering a pro-business atmosphere,” NYSE Group President Lynn Martin said in a press release.

“We are delighted to expand our presence in the Lone Star State, which plays a key role in driving our U.S. economy forward.”

NYSE Texas is planned to be a fully electronic equities exchange as part of the Intercontinental Exchange. The plan, pending regulatory filings, is to reincorporate NYSE Chicago in Texas.

Though some stocks are listed specifically on the Chicago Exchange, it also trades stocks listed on other exchanges like NYSE and NASDAQ. Interestingly, a Chinese group tried to buy the Chicago Exchange back in 2016, but Donald Trump objected to the deal and it was eventually rejected by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Chalk up another case of another company in a failing high tax, high regulation, blue-run locale getting the hell out while the getting is good and moving to Texas.