Blue cities in Texas seem to have at least two general categories of fraud going on: voting fraud to keep Democrats in power no matter what, and old fashioned kickback/graft/featherbedding fraud to keep the money flowing to lefty NGOs and party activists. Now two separate initiatives are taking aim at both these problems in different blue locales.
First up: Harris County allowing voter registration at post office boxes in defiance of the law may open them up to serious state oversight of their voter rolls.
Harris County could face state oversight of its voter roll maintenance if an investigation confirms that voters are registering at post office boxes.
Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson announced Tuesday that she had received a complaint alleging Harris County’s voter registrar is allowing voters to register using post office box addresses instead of physical residence addresses as required by law.
Nelson said her office will begin “an immediate investigation.”
“If we find reason to believe the Harris County Elections Office is failing to protect voter rolls or is not operating in the good faith Texans deserve, we will not hesitate to take the next step toward state oversight,” she added.
The complaint was submitted on November 18 by State Sen. Paul Bettencourt (R–Houston), who is a former Harris County voter registrar.
Bettencourt authored legislation in 2021 that excluded commercial post office boxes as voter registration addresses and set procedures for voter registrars to confirm voters’ residences.
He also authored the 2023 legislation that allows the secretary of state to assume administrative oversight of Harris County’s elections or voter registration if an investigation reveals “a recurring pattern of problems.”
It’s impressive how many years Bettencourt has been lining up this bank-shot.
According to a notification letter sent Monday to Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector and Voter Registrar Annette Ramirez, “The complaint alleges a recurring pattern of problems related to the failure to conduct voter registration list maintenance activities.”
The letter also notes that state funding for voter registration could be withheld if Ramirez fails to perform required duties related to confirming residential addresses.
Ramirez has 30 days to respond.
if Nelson does succeed in putting Houston’s voter rolls under heavy manners, I’m willing to bet money that the P.O. box problem is far from the only way Harris County Democrats are breaking the law.
Next, Save Austin Now wants that city to undergo independent budget audits.
A bipartisan advocacy group that helped defeat Austin’s “Proposition Q” tax hike proposal now hopes to force the city to undergo periodic third-party financial audits to examine spending and efficiency, and analyze policies affecting affordability for residents.
The nonpartisan Save Austin Now PAC launched a petition effort last week to amend the city’s charter to include an “Independent Affordability & Efficiency Initiative” (IAEI), which would mandate the hiring of an independent and experienced entity through a competitive bid process.
The auditing agency would then be tasked with analyzing the spending, performance, and outcomes of all city departments and contractors, in order to identify opportunities to streamline and optimize staffing and management structure and identify fraud, waste, abuse, and conflicts of interest. The IAEI analysis would also include examination of how city policy, such as tax rates, affects resident affordability.
Attorney and former Travis County Judge Bill Aleshire drafted the charter amendment language and told The Texan that under Proposition Q, which would have raised the property tax rate by 20 percent largely to increase services for the homeless, the city’s leaders had not considered the burden placed on taxpayers.
“I think their focus has been on people who are receiving the tax money, but not nearly enough on those who are paying the tax money,” said Aleshire. “Hopefully this will bring that perspective back.”
Aleshire said much of the proposed Austin charter amendment language is drawn from the recent efficiency study completed for the City of Houston last year.
Houston’s efficiency study, completed by Ernst & Young LLP, found duplicative contracts, inconsistent vendor practices, and an outdated management structure under which about 40 percent of city “managers” supervised three or fewer employees. As a result of the study, the city cut spending to reduce a projected deficit and avoid imposing new property tax increases this year.
Under Save Austin Now’s charter proposal, Austin would also establish metrics for measuring the outcomes of programs and policies, something Aleshire notes is absent from the city auditor’s analysis.
“Governments all the time are measuring how many widgets they’re making. Almost never will you find an audit that says as a result of making these widgets how has it impacted the community,” said Aleshire. “It’s not just the work you’re doing, what is the impact of that work?”
The proposed charter amendment would require the city to hire an auditor within 120 days and then complete an audit within one year of the contract. Subsequent audits would be completed every five years, but at least one year before the city could place a voter-approved tax rate increase on the ballot.
What both these proposals have in common is that both blue dots might finally be getting some long-overdue adult supervision.
Also: Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!