Podcaster/YouTuber Shawn Ryan is one of those people that lies at the edge of the Mil-blogger/YouTubers I already watch, but never enough to have a tag for him before now. I recognize him from a Joe Rogan interview thumbnail and the disasterous interview Gavin Newsom had with him, but I’m not really familiar with his work. But it definitely got my attention that Texas Congressman Dan Crenshaw is threatening to sue him, a clash that probably has an added intensity since both are ex-Navy SEALS.
“On December 9th, 2025, I received a legal demand letter from lawyers representing Congressman Dan Crenshaw. They are threatening to sue me for defamation because of comments I made on my podcast about a message that he sent me.”
“They want me to remove content, issue a public apology, and stop talking about him. I’m not going to do any of that.”
“What I originally said a while back, I commented on my show about Congressman Crenshaw throwing an extremely expensive party and the fact that he seems to have become quite wealthy during his time in Congress.”
“I raised questions about how a congressman making $174,000 a year can afford that kind of a lifestyle. These are legitimate questions. And to be honest, I didn’t even mention Dan Crenshaw’s name in that initial conversation.”
“I just brought up the fact that he was having Steve Aoki, a major DJ spin at his party.” I honestly have no idea how much “top DJs” make.
“Multiple news outlets have reported on concerns about congressional insider trading and members of Congress, including Congressman Crenshaw, actively trading stocks while having access to non-public information that affects those very stocks. I’m not the only person asking these questions, but apparently I’m the one that got under Dan’s skin.”
Crenshaw then sent Ryan an Instagram that Ryan perceived to be threatening:
Hey Sean, you have the ability to contact your fellow team guy if you’ve got a problem with me or have questions about how I’m getting rich. Some of my boys at six told me about your indirect swipe at me. From the comment you made, it sounds like you have some beliefs that are based on trendy narratives instead of facts.
Eh, I think Ryan may be over-reacting here. To me the not read more like “What the hell?” than “I’m going to break your kneecaps.”
Ryan then plays a clip of Crenshaw talking about how he’ll kill Tucker Carlson if he meets him. Definitely injudicious on Crenshaw’s part, but not an actionable threat.
“Now his lawyers are claiming that my interpretation of his message is defamation. They say I accused him of threatening me with assault, which is a crime, and that I need to publicly apologize and remove the content from my show.” And here’s where Crenshaw screwed up. The congressman seems unaware of The Streisand Effect. This video already has three million views, so millions of people who previously unaware of the accusations against him have now heard them.
“Here’s my response. No, I’m publishing their full demand letter, along with my lawyer’s response, so that you can read both and decide for yourself whether my interpretation was unreasonable.”
“This is about whether a sitting member of Congress can use the threat of an expensive litigation to silence criticism. I asked questions about Congressman Crenshaw’s wealth. Those questions are fair game. He is a public official. He makes decisions that affect all of us. He trades stocks while having access to classified and non-public information.”
“If Congressman Crenshaw wants to sue me, he can. My lawyers are ready. And if he does, we’re going to use the discovery process to get answers to all the questions I originally asked, questions about his finances and how he affords the lifestyle he’s living on a congressional salary. I suspect that’s the last thing Dan actually wants.”
The upshot of all this is that Crenshaw is going to appear on Ryan’s podcast for an interview.
I should make it clear that I have no idea whether Crenshaw is crooked or not. His official reports don’t show vast wealth. He has two houses, one valued at $1 million, but that price may just be a side effect of the vast inflation of housing prices in the late Biden Administration. (At one point, my house, which I bought when I was making $46,000 a year in 2004, was theoretically worth around $800,000, but the market has cooled quite a bit since then.) I assume the other house is a rental income property.
I have heard accusations of Crenshaw accumulating wealth, but they came from 2nd Congressional District primary opponent Steve Toth, who said “While Dan Crenshaw votes with Democrats and threatens conservatives, he’s also somehow gotten rich off his government salary. I had no idea he’s actually a better trader than Warren Buffett. But not quite as good as Hillary Clinton.”
I sent the following questions to the Toth campaign:
I want to follow this race for my blog, but I asked two questions that I haven’t received an answer to:
1. Can you cite examples of Dan Crenshaw benefiting financially from his office?
2. Can you cite, say, ten bills where Crenshaw’s voting pattern was insufficiently conservative?
I sent those questions off twice, and have yet to get an answer…but did get put on his campaigns mailing list for block walking notifications.
There’s certainly some dissatisfaction with Crenshaw among conservative ranks, as exhibited by the nasty “Eyepatch McCain” nickname bestowed on him. But right now, I have to judge the corruption accusations against him “unproven.”
That said, threatening to sue a podcaster who merely referenced the rumors (and not even by name) is a foolish move that’s going to raise eyebrows.
I couldn’t post to Twitter yesterday, and briefly thought they’d finally banned me for spreading Disapproved Hunter Biden News. Sadly, it was down for everyone, not just me.
Perhaps the selective enforcement of content which is politically harmful to Democrats can be explained by recent hires by the Biden transition team.
According to Breitbart, Twitter Public Policy Director Carlos Monje left the social media giant to join Biden’s transition team in September. He will reportedly serve as co-chair of Biden’s infrastructure policy committee, and helped organize a fundraiser for the former VP this week, according to an invitation from Politico.
Meanwhile in October, Biden’s transition team hired Facebook executive Jessica Hertz to its general counsel to deal with ‘ethics’ issues. Notably, Facebook was the first platform to ban the Post article – with former Democrat staffer and Facebook communications team member Andy Stone tweeting that the company would be ‘reducing its distribution.’
Trump is back and this is a real race. I think we will win it.
Except all the polls are telling us Grandpa Badfinger is up +37, right? Weird how four years ago right now, we were hearing the exact same thing. Ignore the spinners who are solemnly informing you that your lying eyes are lying again and the 2016 polls were akshually very accurate. Baloney. A key component of effective gaslighting is plausibility, and I was there. You were there. All we heard in 2016 was how Trump was going down to a landslide defeat. Instead, everyone in the smart set got blindsided by the Trump Train.
And it can happen again.
Now, it doesn’t have to happen again. Nothing is written, and we have to fight for our victory. There are a lot of stupid people around – my district regularly re-e-elects Ted Lieu – and Oldfinger could build a Coalition of the Drooling to put him in the White House. But I think the Trump lightning will strike again.
Remember, the polls are the only data point in Biden’s favor. The only one. And as we have seen they screwed up last time and their proponents have an interest in them being bad for Trump.
But Kurt, the libs say, “You must hate science because the science of polling cannot be wrong! It’s science.” Yeah, but so is phrenology. The fact is that not only do the polls have a track record of failure with regard to populists like Trump – remember that they also missed a number of Senate seats that were supposed to spin down the drain with The Donald – but many of the pollsters are retained by media outlets with an anti-Trump agenda. If these very fine people in the media lie about everything, like the “very fine people” quote, why would you buy the notion that there’s some line they won’t cross when it comes to faking polls?
Am I saying they will push bullSchiff poll results to try to demoralize patriots? Yes, yes I am. You don’t have to just make up numbers – though I would not put it past them. You just tweak the turnout model and fiddle with the cross-tabs and voila! – CNN has its narrative. After all, it’s not like in the editorial offices they are saying “Sure, we’ll lie about Trump/ Russia, Trump/COVID, and Trump/Nickelback, and hey, there’s no way we’ll fake a poll! We have scruples.” They would sacrifice their babies to Baal if A) they hadn’t hit Planned Parenthood, and B) they thought it would ensure Trump loses.
Also: “Biden rallies look like the shopping mall in Dawn of the Dead, which is apt since the guy handling his media events is apparently George Romero. Only the flesh-eating zombies had more pep than the Delaware Dementite’s fans.” (Hat tip: Director Blue.)
“Democrats Were Awful Filth Questioning ACB.” Kamala Harris looked sad, but Mazie Hirono of Hawaii was probably the biggest loon.
Why do Joe Biden and Kamala Harris refuse to give a straightforward yes or no answer when asked whether they intend to “pack the Court” and expand it to a number larger than the nine justices that have been on the Court for the past 150 years?
Because a considerable portion of the Democratic Party wants to expand the Court beyond nine. In a recent YouGov survey, 47 percent of registered voters opposed expanding the size of the Supreme Court, 34 percent supported it, and 19 percent responded they didn’t know how they felt. But self-identified Democrats were much more supportive: 60 percent wanted to expand the Court, 18 percent opposed the idea, and 22 percent didn’t know.
It quickly became clear that in their attempts to strangle the Hunter Biden story, two social media giants left themselves gasping for air.
Twitter and Facebook took major steps to squelch the New York Post piece, but wound up giving it far more attention than if they had done nothing and let their millions of users share it freely.
For Twitter in particular, if you had to come up with a plan to reinforce conservative complaints about its liberal bias, you could hardly do better than for the tech giant to lock the Trump campaign’s account. Not to mention that of press secretary Kayleigh McEnany as well.
Hashtag: #Fail
In fact, Twitter chief Jack Dorsey admitted in a tweet that the company’s conduct–censoring stories and locking accounts with little public explanation–was “unacceptable.” You got that right, Jack. But then he didn’t do anything to fix it, apparently viewing the self-inflicted wound as just a PR problem. Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans plan to subpoena Dorsey next week.
After a few years of shoeing horses, briefly interrupted by a temporary job mining silver, I ran a brush-clearing and landscaping company as a side hustle. During this scramble for meaningful independence, the leftist tendencies I’d absorbed at college dropped off bit by bit. Life as a capitalist entrepreneur brought out the best in me, even when I was flirting with homelessness. Moreover, being in the real working world pushed me into contact with people, ideas, and situations that challenged me in all sorts of ways. After a few near-fatal incidents with horses (one of which left my skull and jaw shattered), I began pursuing my own business full time in 2016.
Now in my early 20s, I still had a soft spot for socialist ideas, including a lingering resentment toward the wealthy. And so, from a progressive politician’s perspective, I was hardly a lost cause. But I also was becoming aware that the Left didn’t really have much interest in the challenges I was facing, being far more concerned with issues of race and gender identity. As a straight white male, I was supposedly luxuriating in a life of privilege—a stereotype that had nothing to do with my experience as a blue-collar worker who’d faced debilitating family traumas.
Speaking of crazy leftwing city councils, thanks to the SUPERgenius police defunding policies of Mayor Adler and the Austin City Council, some 911 calls have waits of between 2-6 hours.
