Texas Constitutional Amendment Election Tomorrow (With Recommendations)

There’s a Texas Constitutional Amendment election tomorrow.

So let me go through these in “one-eyed man in the land of the blind” fashion:

  1. Proposition 1: Charitable Raffles at Rodeo Venues [HJR 143]. What It Does: Designates sanctioned rodeos as professional sports teams and authorizes professional sports team charitable organizations to conduct raffles at rodeo venues.

    Analysis: This is one of those small ball “every damn thing has to be spelled out in the Texas Constitution” amendments Yes.

  2. Proposition 2: County Infrastructure Bonds in Blighted Areas [HJR 99]. What It Does: Authorizes counties to issue bonds (debt) to fund infrastructure and transportation projects in underdeveloped, unproductive, or blighted areas.

    Analysis: Lots of direct mail flyers trying to pimp this thing. “Underdeveloped,” “unproductive” and “blighted” sound like excuses to throw government subsidies to private business interests, with all the attendant possibilities of cronyism, graft and fraud. Texas local governments do not suffer from a crushing lack of debt. “Compared to the top 10 most populous states in the nation, Texas’ local debt per capita ranks as the second highest total, behind only New York (Texas Bond Review Board, 2021, p. 4). Proposition 2 may aggravate this situation by allowing counties to take on even more debt, which could result in higher future taxes, increased debt service payments, and credit rating risk.” No.

  3. Proposition 3: Prohibition on Limiting Religious Services [SJR 27]. What It Does: State and local governments may not enact any rules that prohibit or limit religious services by religious organizations.

    Analysis: You know how Canada imprisoned a minister for daring to hold church services? Texas don’t cotton to none of that. Yes.

  4. Proposition 4: Eligibility Requirements for Certain Judicial Offices [SJR 47] What It Does: Adds that state Supreme Court and court of appeals justices, and court of criminal appeals judges, must be Texas residents at the time of election. They must have been practicing lawyers licensed in the state of Texas and/or Texas state or county court judges for at least 10 years (the current amount of experience), with no suspensions of their licenses. Requires district court judges to have eight years of Texas law practice and/or court judge experience, with no suspensions—twice the current requirement of four years of combined experience.

    Analysis: Seems like sound requirements. Yes.

  5. Proposition 5: Authority of State Commission on Judicial Conduct [HJR 165]. What It Does: Authorizes the Commission to investigate complaints and reports against candidates for state judicial office, in the same manner it does judicial officeholders.

    Analysis: Mildly in favor, though the advantage of catching bad apples before they’re elected has to be weighed against the possibility of the commission being used to stifle dissent. Yes.

  6. Proposition 6: Right to Designated Essential Caregiver [SJR 19]. What It Does: Residents of nursing, assisted living, and similar residential facilities have the right to designate an essential caregiver who may not be denied in-person visitation.

    Analysis: More Flu Manchu fallout spelling out things that we didn’t realize needed spelling out before. Yes.

  7. Proposition 7: Homestead Tax Limit for Surviving Spouses of Disabled [HJR 125]. What It Does: Extends the current homestead school tax limit for disabled individuals to surviving spouses who are at least 55 years old and reside at the home.

    Analysis: More small ball. Yes.

  8. Proposition 8: Homestead Tax Exemption for Surviving Military Spouses [SJR 35]. What It Does: Expands the current homestead tax exemption to include surviving spouses of service members fatally injured in the line of duty, along with those killed outright.

    Analysis: More small ball. Yes.

If you live in Austin, I recommend a very strong Yes vote on Proposition A, to restore police staffing to sane levels, and a moderate No vote on Proposition B. I haven’t had time to research the ins and outs of this landswap, but with all the flyers I’ve been getting touting it, somebody’s palms are getting greased and somebody is going to make out like a bandit, so I would vote no just on general principle.

Tags: , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Texas Constitutional Amendment Election Tomorrow (With Recommendations)”

  1. Chemist says:

    I disagree with you on Props 7 & 8.
    It seems like every election we have another proposition to exempt someone else from paying taxes.
    I’m tired of it.
    Someday soon the only people left paying taxes will be you and I.

  2. Clinton says:

    I’ve lived in Austin since ‘81, but if the voters choose to buy into the well-financed anti-Prop A advertising and vote the measure down, I’ll certainly sell my home and move away. The near-doubling of homicide and sexual assault stats since the City Council’s slashing of APD’s budget means those grim crime stats are only a foretaste of bad things to come.

  3. Gospace says:

    New York- all propositions:

    NO!

  4. Proposition 4:

    Nope. Sorry, but one of the problems we have is the regulatory capture of the legal system. Allowing this has been transforming this country from one under the Rule of Law to one under the Rule of Lawyers.

  5. John Fisher says:

    I don’t live in TX but if I did I’d vote against Proposition 4. In fact we’d be better off if any Supreme Court had a requirement that only the Chief Justice could be a lawyer and he could only vote to break ties.

Leave a Reply