The Nation’s Alexander Cockburn calls Anthropogenic Global Warming “A Farce”

December 25th, 2009

ClimateGate continues to bubble along. It’s no surprise to see those on the right critical of AGW, but when a dyed-in-the-wool far lefty like The Nation‘s Alexander Cockburn calls it a farce, that’s pretty notable. (Evidently Cockburn has been a long-time skeptic of AGW, but I was unaware of it. Readers may apportion blame for this either to my own laziness, or the mainstream media’s insistence on framing AGW skepticism as an exclusive attitude of the right, as they see fit.)

Some quotes:

Deceitful manipulation of data, concealment or straightforward destruction of inconvenient evidence, vindictive conspiracies to silence critics, are par for the course in all scientific debate. But in displaying all these characteristics, the CRU e-mails graphically undermine the claim of the Warmers that they command the moral as well as scientific high ground. It has been a standard ploy of the Warmers to revile the skeptics as whores of the energy industry, swaddled in munificent grants and with large personal stakes in discrediting AGW. Actually, the precise opposite is true. Billions in funding and research grants sluice into the big climate-modeling enterprises and a vast archipelago of research departments and “institutes of climate change” across academia. It’s where the money is. Skepticism, particularly for a young climatologist or atmospheric physicist, can be a career breaker.

And this:

The battles in Nicaea in 325 were faith based, with no relation to science or reason. So were the premises of the Copenhagen summit, that the planet faces catastrophic warming caused by manmade CO2 buildup, and that human intervention – geoengineering – could avert the coming disaster. Properly speaking, it’s a farce. In terms of distraction from cleaning up the pollutants that are actually killing people, it’s a terrible tragedy.

The first thing all those on the left and right should agree on is respect for a scientific method unthered to political influence. Sadly, ClimateGate proves that we are very far from that when it comes to climate research.

Merry Christmas!

December 24th, 2009

After all, mankind cannot live on politics alone…

Obama Now More Loathed than Bush at the end of his term

December 22nd, 2009

According to Rasmussen, via Gateway Pundit.

Man, that’s got to sting. That’s what happens when you ignore mounting job losses to push expensive legislation that everyone hates.

Hey, just imagine if Obama announced that he was asking Congress to kill ObamaCare and cap-and-trade, and instead concentrate on bringing down the deficit and eliminating government disincentives to growth? Just imagine how much his poll numbers would rebound!

Nahhhhhh. That would take someone more politically savy, someone willing to turn his back on the unpopular liberal nostrums of his core supporters to save his own political skin. Someone like…Bill Clinton.

Did you ever think we’d be comparing Obama unfavorably to Clinton before the first year of his first term was even out?

ClimateGate Supression of Dissent: A Case Study

December 21st, 2009

Here are the authors of a study critical of the consensus AGW narrative which the leaked CRU letters talk about how to suppress. The letters discuss how to stack peer reviewers in favor of AGW and against dissenters, and how to bypass the normal peer review cycle to cram a response in immediately after the critical paper.

Hint: this is not the way disinterested science is supposed to work.

Richard Epstein says Reid’s ObamaCare Bill is Unconstitutional

December 21st, 2009

Noted Constitutional law scholar Richard A. Epstein says Harry Reid’s ObamaCare bill is unconstitutional.

“The Supreme Court’s basic constitutional requirement is that any firm in a regulated market be allowed to recover a risk-adjusted competitive rate of return on its accumulated capital investment. See Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch, 488 U.S. 299 (1988).

“The Reid Bill emphatically fails this test by imposing sharp limitations on the ability of health-insurance companies to raise fees or exclude coverage. Moreover, the Reid Bill forces on these regulated firms onerous new obligations that they will not be able to fund from their various revenue sources. The squeeze between the constricted revenue sources allowable under the Reid Bill and the extensive new legal obligations it imposes is likely to result in massive cash crunch that could drive the firms that serve the individual and small-group health-insurance markets into bankruptcy.”

I’m not even remotely enough of a Constitutional Law scholar to know if his argument is correction, but Epstein is certainly one of the heavy-hitters in that field, and his book Takings is is one of the most important works on the subject of the federal government exceeding its constitutional power in the last quarter century. And he actually appears to have read the bill, which probably puts him one up on, oh, more than half the Senators voting on it…

Spending Lots of Taxpayer Money to Accomplish Nothing

December 21st, 2009

If there’s a theme for the Obama years, and for the Pelosi/Reid legislation Obama has embraced, it’s that of spending tremendous amounts of taxpayer dollars to accomplish almost nothing. Consider:

What all three have in common?

  • All are hugely expensive. How expensive no one knows, but given the vast increase we’ve seen in the cost of Social Security, Medicare, etc., my guess would be tens of trillions of dollars over the next 30 years.
  • All are exteremly unpopular among the taxpayers who are being asked to foot the bill.
  • All accomplish almost nothing except increase the size of the federal government and channeling money to Obama allies like ACORN and SEIU.

The way things are going, the slaughter of Democratic incumbents in the 2010 election could make 1994 look like a picnic by comparison…

Update:

Greetings Farkers!

&#60Troy McClure&#62Hi, I’m Lawrence Person! You may remember me from such Flamewars as “ObamaCare is all about choice, or rather, taking choices away from American citizens and giving them to government bureaucrats” and “From Iran to Honduras, millions of people around the world long for freedom and democracy. And wherever those seeking freedom can be found, Obama will be there…grinding his bootheel into their face”.&#60&#47Troy McClure&#62

Come in and sit a spell. Have a beer and stretch your feet out to the toasty flamewar goodness. Feel free to buy a book or check out my other, completely non-political blog.

And, above all, Obey the Hypnotoad!

Nancy Pelosi TechnoChicken Remix

December 20th, 2009

Watch if you dare.

In a way however, this strange juxtaposition is deeply unfair, and even cruel. The chicken is a noble (if dimwitted) creature that provides desperately needed sustenance to a hungry world. It is an insult to conflate it with such a corrupt, evil and debased entity as Nancy Pelosi…

The Constitution is not a Suicide Pact, but ObamaCare is

December 18th, 2009

Given that it’s no so extrordinarily unpopular that it threatens to unseat numerous Democratic senators next year.

  • “A recent Zogby poll showed 28% of state voters support ‘reform.’ A full 40% said they’d be less likely to vote for Democratic Sen. Byron Dorgan next year if he supports a bill. In a theoretical matchup with Republican Gov. John Hoeven (who has yet to announce), Mr. Hoeven wins 55% to 36%. Mr. Dorgan has been in the Senate 17 years; he won his last election with 68% of the vote.”
  • “In Arkansas, 32% support this health-care legislation. Sen. Blanche Lincoln, also running next year, trails challengers by more than 50 points among the 56% of voters who strongly disapprove of the health plan.”
  • “Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, the public face of health reform, can barely break 38% approval in Nevada.”

Maybe they should be calling it “doctor-assisted political suicide”…

Russians now saying their climate data was distorted, cherry-picked

December 16th, 2009

According to this report CRU “probably tampered with Russian-climate data.”

It goes on:

“Analysts say Russian meteorological stations cover most of the country’s territory, and that the Hadley Center had used data submitted by only 25% of such stations in its reports. Over 40% of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature calculations for some other reasons, rather than the lack of meteorological stations and observations.

“The data of stations located in areas not listed in the Hadley Climate Research Unit Temperature UK (HadCRUT) survey often does not show any substantial warming in the late 20th century and the early 21st century.”

The deeper people look into the data, the more data manipulation they find. Insert your own “tip of the iceberg” joke here.

Global Warming: Data from the Greenland Ice Cores

December 15th, 2009

I’m not an expert, but if the information presented here is accurate, it makes a pretty compelling case that the warming trend we experienced in the 20th century was quite normal within the overall geological time-frame.