Supreme Court to District Court on Texas Redistricting Plan: REJECTED!

December 10th, 2011

The Supreme Court Friday night “blocked a redistricting plan for Texas drawn by a panel of federal judges.”

I’ve got to run off, and the issue is far from settled, but this is good news for the rule of law, and bad news for liberals wanting to abuse the court system to get what they want despite voters rejecting them again and again.

[Edited to add: Crappy, hastily written headline now rewritten to make it clear this was a U.S. Supreme Court stay, not the Texas Supreme Court, which is obviously holds no sway over a U.S. District Court. – LP]

European Union to Become SuperDuper European Union

December 9th, 2011

Let me see if I can get this straight:

UK Prime Minister David Cameron, objecting to the Deutschland Uber Alles renegotiation of the Maastricht Treaty, is now causing the creation of a new SuperDuper Europe, with Germany reoccupying the Rhineland taking leadership of the whole shebang, finally erasing the rest of the continent’s reluctance at receiving orders from Berlin?

I mean, when even the Europhillic New York Times says that “Twenty years after the Maastricht Treaty, which was designed not just to integrate Europe but to contain the might of a united Germany, Berlin had effectively united Europe under its control,” maybe the citizens of those stodgy old entities we used to call “countries” should consider the possibility that they might may be making a mistake. I am especially surprised that the non-Euro-using generalgouvernement Poland gave in so readily, as their previous experiences with rule from Berlin have been less than exemplary.

But what’s sacrificing the last of your country’s vestigially sovereignty compared to the glorious dream of saving the Euro?

Assuming, of course, that forging this Pact of Steel (including a 500 billion Euro bailout fund) actually saves the Euro, which is a dubious proposition at best. And at least one U.S. general says we should be prepared for civil unrest if Euro ends up exploding anyway.

The irony, of course, is that David Cameron, the wetest Tory Wet PM since Neville Chamberlain, refused to give in to another Eurotreaty British citizens wouldn’t get a chance to vote on less than two months after refusing to allow a vote on the previous EU treaty British citizens were not allowed to vote on. It would be ironic if Cameron actually ended up pulling the UK out of the EU because, in a moment of weakness, he actually exhibited rare and uncharacteristic streaks of firm principle and common sense.

Will the citizens of Europe actually get a chance to vote on this Reich closer European integration? Doubtful. Ireland’s Taoiseach is being “cagey” about a vote. (Translation: Fark no, you peasants won’t get a vote.) I doubt any of his brothers in Europe’s Permanent Ruling Class will feel any less “cagey.”

Through a thousand small steps, from committees and working groups and consultations and emergency decrees, Eurocrats have done their very best to remove power for all important decisions from the hands of the people and entrust it into their own well-greased palms. And also, not so coincidentally, to avoid taking the blame for the ruin their cradle-to-grave welfare states, and the huge and ever-growing debts necessary to pay for them, have made of Europe’s once free nations and productive economies.

Other Eurozone news, some possibly stale and out of date:

  • Jim DeMint says the best way for us to help Europe is not to help Europe.
  • Portugal’s economy is shrinking.
  • Moody’s downgrades French banks.
  • Problem: Possibility of sovereign debt default means bond downgrades. Solution: Create a bailout fund. problem: Downgrade of bailout fund. Solution: ?????
  • Europe’s Coming Inflation:

    For years, Europeans loved to lecture Americans on the both the safety and soundness of the continent’s banking system as opposed to our own, and how their economic system worked so much better than ours. Well, one lesson of the 2011 financial crisis is that many of their banks are probably in worse shape than the US banks were in 2008.

    At least our banks’ troubled investments were tied to real estate, which may rebound once our economy improves. Their banks are holding debt tied to some of the world’s least productive, no-growth countries.

    Why so underproductive? Most of the evidence points to the failure of the European welfare state.

    Europeans loved to lecture Americans on how government-run health-care and cradle-to-grave entitlements provided such safety and comfort for the masses. People supposedly didn’t mind paying higher taxes because it enhanced their standard of living.

    Until, of course, it didn’t enhance anything — and Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal face the collapse of their safety nets because they can’t borrow to pay for them anymore, even as unemployment is rampant. (Meanwhile, France is not far behind.)

  • UT Law Dean Resigns Over Slush Fund Payouts

    December 9th, 2011

    Keep in mind that’s not what the headline says, which is a more neutral “UT law dean forced to step down.” But what else do you call “a $500,000 forgivable loan” to UT Dean Larry Sager “at a time when deans, vice presidents and other top university officials were under a salary freeze”? When you give people money they don’t have to pay back, that’s not a loan, that’s a gift. (I also wonder whether Dean Sager declared this money on his taxes. Or did he not have to, because it was a “loan”?) And slush fund seems to be the proper term for a fund from which sums can be doled out without administrative accountability.

    Or, to put it another way: If it were revealed that University of Texas head football coach Mack Brown had such a fund, to receive funds from or to dole out at his discretion, not only would we be calling it a slush fund, he would be fired, National Championship notwithstanding. Should the UT Law School be held to a lesser standard than the UT Athletics Department?

    No wonder the Texas Public Policy Foundation continues to advocate for lower administrative costs in higher education, among many other needed reforms. This most recent incident shows such reform is still badly needed.

    (Hat tip: Tax Prof Blog via Instapundit.)

    Fast and Furious Update for December 8, 2011

    December 8th, 2011

    Some cleaning-up after yesterday’s bombshell:

  • Holder stonewalls today on both fast and Furious and Elena Kagan’s role in ObamaCare.
  • Wisconsin Republican Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner suggests impeachment of administration officials involved with Fast and Furious. he’s right. Breaking the law in a way that results in the deaths of innocent Americas solely to justify a cynical political ploy is indeed an impeachable offense.
  • Say Uncle pointed out that the U.S. House of Representatives now has a Fast and Furious webpage. Including this handy PDF listing all the fast and Furious players, and this one listing the victims. A very good start, though this scandal begs for some sort of interactive web widget to follow all the threads of evidence…
  • Obama gives Holder the dreaded vote of confidence.
  • Sipsey Street also provides an email thread between former ATF head Kenneth Melson and former United States Attorney for the District of Arizona Dennis Burke on getting their Fast and Furious stories straight.
  • Also from Sipsey Street (really, if you’re only going to follow one source for Fast and Furious, it should be them) comes further news of Obama’s war on the ATF whistle-blowers.
  • Republicans House members to Holder: Heads must roll.
  • Documents Shows Fast and Furious WAS About Promoting Gun Control

    December 7th, 2011

    Continuing her excellent reporting on the issue, Sharyl Attkisson drops another bombshell: Just like us “paranoid” right wingers thought all along, Fast and Furious was about promoting gun control:

    Documents obtained by CBS News show that the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) discussed using their covert operation “Fast and Furious” to argue for controversial new rules about gun sales.

    [snip]

    ATF officials didn’t intend to publicly disclose their own role in letting Mexican cartels obtain the weapons, but emails show they discussed using the sales, including sales encouraged by ATF, to justify a new gun regulation called “Demand Letter 3”. That would require some U.S. gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or “long guns.” Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.

    On July 14, 2010 after ATF headquarters in Washington D.C. received an update on Fast and Furious, ATF Field Ops Assistant Director Mark Chait emailed Bill Newell, ATF’s Phoenix Special Agent in Charge of Fast and Furious:

    “Bill – can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same (licensed gun dealer) and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks.”

    On Jan. 4, 2011, as ATF prepared a press conference to announce arrests in Fast and Furious, Newell saw it as “(A)nother time to address Multiple Sale on Long Guns issue.” And a day after the press conference, Chait emailed Newell: “Bill–well done yesterday… (I)n light of our request for Demand letter 3, this case could be a strong supporting factor if we can determine how many multiple sales of long guns occurred during the course of this case.”

    Read the whole thing.

    The best, most favorable explanation is that Fast and Furious was instituted for some still-undisclosed purpose, and that some ATF agents saw it as a ghoulish opportunity to promote gun control.

    The worst: The Obama Administration designed and implemented Fast and Furious in a premeditated fashion, breaking the law and helping kill hundreds of Mexican citizens and U.S. border patrol agent Brian Terry, all for the sole, express purpose of promoting gun control.

    They had to kill people with guns in order to save them from getting killed by guns.

    It shows that just because your paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you.

    Hat tip: Powerline, where John Hinderaker says: “If the Obama administration did arrange for the shipment of arms to Mexican drug gangs, not for any legitimate public purpose but in order to advance a left-wing political agenda, and those guns were used to murder hundreds of Mexicans and at least one American border agent–which they were–then we are looking at a scandal that dwarfs any in modern American history.”

    Indeed.

    Fast and Furious Update: Obama Administration Now Laundering Drug Cartel Money?

    December 7th, 2011

    So says that bastion of right-wing propaganda, The New York Times:

    Undercover American narcotics agents have laundered or smuggled millions of dollars in drug proceeds as part of Washington’s expanding role in Mexico’s fight against drug cartels, according to current and former federal law enforcement officials.

    [snip]

    The officials said that while the D.E.A. conducted such operations in other countries, it began doing so in Mexico only in the past few years. The high-risk activities raise delicate questions about the agency’s effectiveness in bringing down drug kingpins, underscore diplomatic concerns about Mexican sovereignty, and blur the line between surveillance and facilitating crime. As it launders drug money, the agency often allows cartels to continue their operations over months or even years before making seizures or arrests.

    [snip]

    Another former agency official, who asked not to be identified speaking publicly about delicate operations, said, “My rule was that if we are going to launder money, we better show results. Otherwise, the D.E.A. could wind up being the largest money launderer in the business, and that money results in violence and deaths.”

    Those are precisely the kinds of concerns members of Congress have raised about a gun-smuggling operation known as Fast and Furious

    I suppose it’s progress of a sort when even The New York Times realizes something went horribly wrong in Fast and Furious. And even if the money laundering program was working, what chance does it have now that the cover has been blown?

    Does anyone actually believe the Obama Administration has an effective, coherent plan to take down the cartels?

    What next? Will we find out that U.S. agents actually carried out cartel assassinations?

    Also this:

    The former officials said that federal law enforcement agencies had to seek Justice Department approval to launder amounts greater than $10 million in any single operation. But they said that the cap was treated more as a guideline than a rule, and that it had been waived on many occasions to attract the interest of high-value targets.

    If Fast and Furious is any guide, those “hundreds of thousands of dollars” will turn out to be tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars.

    (Hat tip: Instapundit.)

    Dewhurst Contributions: A Lot of Money from Fulbright & Jaworski

    December 6th, 2011

    It takes a while for the FEC to put up the list of individual donations (even longer than putting up the summary reports), so I didn’t think to check out David Dewhurst’s individual contributions until this week. One thing that jumped out at me from the report was just how many donations he got from lawyers at Fulbright & Jaworski.

    Fulbright & Jaworski ranked 52 overall on the Vault list of the top 100 law firms in the U.S., and fourth in the energy sector. The Jaworksi in the name comes from Watergate prosecutor Leon Jaworski. They’re headquartered in Houston but have offices worldwide. They’re generally considered one of the three biggest law firms in Houston, the other two being Baker Botts and Vinson & Elkins.

    From the FEC, here are the donations Dewhurst received from Fulbright & Jaworski employees for his senate race (presented in the same format provided by the FEC, both for authenticity, and because I’m too lazy to reformat them):

  • BELL, JERRY A MR JR AUSTIN TX 78701 09/27/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P./ATTOR
  • BODE, JOYCE R MS AUSTIN TX 78701 09/27/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P.
  • BRADEN, PAUL MR HOUSTON TX 77024 09/27/2011 250.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP/ATTORNEY
  • CAUDILL, WILLIAM H MR HOUSTON TX 77006 09/19/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P./ATTOR
  • DILLARD, STEPHEN C MR HOUSTON TX 77056 09/29/2011 500.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P./ATTORN
  • DRANSFIELD, ROBERT D MR DALLAS TX 75205 09/27/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP/ATTORNEY
  • GARCIA, FRANK T MR HOUSTON TX 77024 09/19/2011 500.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP/ATTORNEY
  • GOVETT, BRETT C MR DALLAS TX 75205 09/20/2011 500.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSK/ATTORNEY
  • GRAHAM, JOSEPH M MR JR HOUSTON TX 77056 09/30/2011 300.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP/ATTORNEY
  • HALL, CHARLES W MR HOUSTON TX 77019 09/19/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P./LAWYER
  • HETTINGER, GLEN J MR HEATH TX 75032 09/27/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP/ATTORNEY
  • HUGHES, THOMAS MR BAYTOWN TX 77521 09/27/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI/ATTORNEY
  • KOENIG, RODNEY C MR HOUSTON TX 77010 09/19/2011 250.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP/ATTORNEY
  • KONTRIMAS, ANDRIUS MR HOUSTON TX 77010 09/27/2011 2000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P./ATTORN
  • KRAUSS, LAYNE E MR HOUSTON TX 77010 09/29/2011 1300.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P./ATTORN
  • KRUSE, LAYNE MR HOUSTON TX 77010 09/19/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P./ATTORN
  • KUNTZ, STEPHEN A MR HOUSTON TX 77005 09/19/2011 500.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP/ATTORNEY
  • LEGGETTE, L POE DENVER CO 80202 09/27/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P./ATTOR
  • MACON, JANE MS SAN ANTONIO TX 78205 09/27/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P./ATTOR
  • MCCLURE, DANIEL MEAD MR HOUSTON TX 77010 09/27/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P./ATTOR
  • PAKALKA, WILLIAM R MR HOUSTON TX 77010 09/27/2011 500.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P./ATTORN
  • PFEIFFER, STEVEN B MR ALEXANDRIA VA 22301 09/29/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P./ATTORN
  • POWELL, CHARLES D MR HOUSTON TX 77005 09/27/2011 2300.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI/PARTNER
  • STEWART, KENNETH L MR DALLAS TX 75225 09/27/2011 1000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP/ATTORNEY
  • TRAUTNER, KEVIN MR HOUSTON, TX 77005 09/19/2011 250.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP/ATTORNEY
  • WOLF, HOWARD MR AUSTIN TX 78703 09/27/2011 2500.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P./ATTOR
  • WOLF, HOWARD MR AUSTIN TX 78703 09/27/2011 -2500.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P./ATTOR
  • WOLF, HOWARD MR AUSTIN TX 78703 09/27/2011 5000.00 FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, L.L.P./ATTOR
  • I actually offer this up as more of a data point than a “gotcha.” While some Fulbright & Jaworski lawyers have been involved in liberal causes (like representing detained terrorists at Guantanamo Bay), 71% of their political donations have gone to Republicans. Fulbright & Jaworski seems to have done a lot of work for Dewhurst’s company Falcon Seaboard. (The Howard Wolf listed above is actually a retired partner for Fulbright & Jaworsk, as he’s currently President and Acting Chairman of Falcon Seaboard, has been appointed to several state boards, and is one of Dewhurst’s closest confidants.) Indeed, Dewhurst’s ties to the company are so extensive that he was he was willing to do this video taking about how awesome they are:

    (I was also surprised to find an old high school classmate in the same video…)

    A Look at David Dewhurst’s Personal Financial Report

    December 5th, 2011

    Although they haven’t officially been put up yet, Quorum Report has obtained the personal financial disclosure report the U.S. Senate requires for David Dewhurst, Ted Cruz, Tom Leppert and Ricardo Sanchez. According to the Statesman, Dewhurst’s wealth adds up to some $225 million, quite a formidable amount (I suspect that myself and many of my readers could be quite content for 1/100th of that), but not quite the billionaire some had tagged him as.

    Tom Leppert clocked in at $12 million (nice, but an order of magnitude less than Dewhurst) and Ted Cruz came in at just under $1 million. Ricardo Sanchez had a net worth of $212,009, but that was probably before his recent house fire.

    A little bird was kind enough to provide me a copy of Dewhurst’s report, and I wanted to take note of a few tidbits.

    Under income, Dewhurst lists his salary from the State of Texas at $61,119. The Lieutenant Governor’s base salary, as set by the Texas Constitution, is $7,200, though actual pay varies somewhat depending on which days he acts as the acting governor. I find it ironic that if I wanted to be Lieutenant Governor, I’d have to take a significant pay cut. Still, I bet the benefits are pretty awesome…

    Dewhurst’s biggest wealth comes in the form of holdings in Falcon Seaboard, the energy and investment company he founded and for which he owns (according to the report) 97.38%. His report lists assets to the tune of over $50 million in Falcon Diversified and $25–50 million in Falcon Seaboard Investment Company, plus over $50 million in a blind trust. He also listed a receivable note from them in the $1–5 million range, as well as a promissory note (i.e. loan) from them in the $5–25 million range. Plus various other Falcon Seaboard-related investments and income.

    Next comes Section IIIA, Publicly traded assets and unearned income sources, which lists the companies Dewhurst owns shares of stock in. Among those he has listed as owning shares worth between $100,000–250,000:

  • Applied Materials (as I was an employee of Applied Materials for several years, I own a good bit of their stock myself (though only the shares in my 401K remain), so if he’s held them from any time prior to 2001, I’d just like to offer my condolences to the Lt. Governor for his capital losses…)
  • Baxter International Incorporated
  • Carnival
  • Stocks he holds $50,001-100,000 in are:

  • Boeing
  • Calpine
  • Carmax
  • Comcast
  • Diebold (the liberal conspiracy theorists should have a field day with this one!)
  • ENI (Italian multinational oil and gas company)
  • France Telecom S.A.
  • Nippon Telegraph and Telecom
  • Sanofi-Aventis (French pharmaceutical company)
  • Telecom Italia
  • Total S.A. (French oil company)
  • Unileaver N.V.
  • There are also lesser amounts of stock in Section IIIB, non-publicly traded assets and unearned income sources, which are presumably either in trusts or retirement accounts. (I am neither a lawyer nor an accountant.) I’m not clear if all Mr. Dewhurst’s stock holdings are inside or outside of his blind trust, or some other arrangement. My quick impression is that, blind trust or not, that’s an awful lot of foreign corporations for an American politician to have investments in.

    Other tidbits:

  • Speaking of liberal conspiracy theorists, the fact that Dewhurst is a Vice President for the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs will no doubt send many of the Daily Kossacks reaching for their NEOCON bricks. (For the record, Wikipedia lists Dewhurst’s religion as Presbyterian, and the JINSA board includes several other prominent non-Jews, including Connie Mack and Bill White.)
  • As you might expect for someone made of money, he has an Amex Black Card.
  • There has been some controversy over him selling stock in Caterpillar “when he was one of three state officials who approved a $1.175 million state grant to the company to build a facility in Seguin.” Also: “Although the stock was in Dewhurst’s state blind trust, there have long been questions about whether the fund was truly at arm’s length because Dewhurst’s brother Gene was one of the trustees.”
  • That’s not a very blind trust. Indeed, about the trust, the report says “Mr. Dewhurst is the 100% beneficiary of the David Dewhurst Blind Trust which is a grantor trust for tax purposes. The trust is NOT considered a blind trust.” Que?

    I’ll be happy to link to Dewhurst’s report (as well as those of the other candidates) when they’re publicly available.

    Another Democratic Party Longshot, Virgil Bierschwale, Joins the Texas Senate Race

    December 5th, 2011

    Real Estate agent Virgil Bierschwale sent me an email to note that he was joining the senate race; presumably the Texas senate race, although his text-heavy website does not mention our fair state until a good way down the page. (Pro-tip: It helps if you let people know what state you’re running in at the very top of your webpage.)

    Mr. Bierschwale seems to be a disgruntled former Republican upset over free trade, globalization, and Grover Norquist (not necessarily in that order). As Mr. Bierschwale seems to approve of the Occupy Wall Street crowd, it does seem that he’s running in the right primary. Now we’ll see if he has the drive and stamina to zoom past Stanley Garza and challenge Sean Hubbard for second place…

    LinkSwarm for December 4, 2011

    December 4th, 2011

    I’ve been sick this weekend, so here are a few random link of interest before they get positively antique:

  • Dear White Working Class Voters: we don’t need you any more. Love, the Democratic Party.
  • WILLisms provides more information on Texas job growth vs. the rest of the nation.
  • Mark Steyn on Hugh Hewitt. He’s not overly impressed with Newt Gingrich.
  • Good: Teen births are falling. Bad: out-pf-wedlock births are rising in every demographic.