Democrats Really Haven’t Thought Through This “Total War” Thing

The Democratic Party establishment is having a full-bore freakout over President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell exercising their constitutionally enumerated powers to nominate and confirm a Supreme Court replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

They’re talking about “total war“:

Furious Democrats are considering total war — profound changes to two branches of government, and even adding stars to the flag — if Republicans jam through a Supreme Court nominee then lose control of the Senate.

On the table: Adding Supreme Court justices … eliminating the Senate’s 60-vote threshold to end filibusters … and statehood for D.C. and Puerto Rico. “If he holds a vote in 2020, we pack the court in 2021,” Rep. Joe Kennedy III (D-Mass.) tweeted.

Why it matters: Democrats are enraged by GOP hypocrisy of rushing through a new justice for President Trump after stalling President Obama’s final nominee.

  • Dems aren’t optimistic about blocking the nominee. But they have many ways of retaliating if they win Senate control — and are licking their chops about real movement on ideas that have been pushed futilely for decades.
  • For instance, the Constitution doesn’t fix the number of justices, which could be changed by an act of Congress and the president’s signature, according to the National Constitution Center.
  • Also, Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer said that if “Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year.”

    I don’t think Democrats have thought their cunning scheme all the way through.

    If Democrats really want to contemplate total war*, then what’s to prevent Republicans from implementing those same measures next year if they win?

    Eliminate the filibuster? Bring it on! Packing the court with two more justices? Why not four?

    Democrats seem to be operating on the old Soviet doctrine of “What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is negotiable.” We should take any “if we win, we’ll do X” proposal as a blueprint of our own (assuming it’s not outright unconstitutional; after all, Republicans, unlike Democrats, still respect the Constitution).

    What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.


    *Like pretty much all their rhetoric these days, “total war” is drama queen overstatement. In a real left-right no-hold-barred, actual honest-to-God shooting war, the right wins because we have all the guns.

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

    2 Responses to “Democrats Really Haven’t Thought Through This “Total War” Thing”

    1. T Migratorious says:

      Apparently they’ve forgotten that the “total war” they unleashed on Brett Kavanaugh led to them losing the Senate.

      Agreed that they haven’t thought this through. They didn’t listen to Michael Corleone: “Never hate your enemies. It affects your judgement.”

    2. johnb. says:

      “If Democrats really want to contemplate total war*, then what’s to prevent Republicans from implementing those same measures next year if they win?”

      What did the Republicans do when they controlled the House, Senate, White House and fifty percent of state governments in 2016? They did nothing, they’ll never do anything. They’re a lobby group for the Chamber of Commerce and not a real political party.

    Leave a Reply