Yes, They Are Trying To Turn Babies Gay

You know how liberals always mock the idea that the left is trying to turn babies gay? Well, this short Asmongold video offers pretty compelling evidence that they’re trying to turn babies gay.

Some titles on in the “Gay Kids Book Section” of Barnes & Noble on display:

  • Bye Bye Binary
  • Gay BCs (“Bi s for B,” “C is for Coming Out,” “D is for drag”)
  • “This is pushing it.” “This is not pushing it. This is beyond everything.”

    “F should be for ‘FBI.'”

    The irony is that it’s a lesbian couple filming this, and they think it’s too much.

    “Bro, I think we’re losing gay marriage pretty soon. I think this is going to go so far it’s going to radicalize. It’s going to make people fucking hate gay people again. Trying to push on literal fucking babies.”

    Parents should contact Barnes & Noble and ask them why they think this is appropriate…

    Tags: , , , , ,

    11 Responses to “Yes, They Are Trying To Turn Babies Gay”

    1. Andy Markcyst says:

      “Soon”? Already there Asmongold. Already there. Gay people became nose-blind to tons of groomers in their ranks, and it’s going to have repercussions.

    2. Jimmy McNulty says:

      Marriage is empty when it can be between gay couples.
      Do what you want, but do not call it marriage. The sacred bond between man and wife.

    3. Alpheus says:

      I’m going to push back against the notion that the gay community became nose-blind to the groomers. The gay community, rather, was taken over (or maybe even created by) Gramscian Communists, for whom gay rights was never the issue — the issue has always been Revolution.

      They have spent lots of effort to convince us that gay marriage is normal, and once they got it, a lot of “normies” dropped out of the activism … but the Commie’s goal to destroy all our institutions isn’t satisfied, so as soon as gay marriage was approved, the Commies went straight for tranny rights — including the “right” to transition children. And they’ve been pushing for kids in general as well — because if you can destroy kids, you destroy a generation.

      It’s really funny how some of their setbacks are self-inflicted because of their One Rule: “Grab every opportunity to increase or keep power the moment it presents itself, long-term consequences be damned” — as can be seen by how Slate had to scrub their site of pro-grooming articles so they can cancel Milo — among many, many other examples.

      These same people also take over respected institutions, abuse their power, demand respect (not knowing that a good portion of respect came from not abusing their power) — and are shocked when no one respects the institutions anymore.

    4. Lawrence Person says:

      I think it was Salon rather than Slate that had all those pro-pedophilia pieces. Easy to get them confused, given how irrelevant both are…

    5. Cato Renasci says:

      Indeed there are a substantial number of gays who find grooming of small children highly offensive. I first learned of the existence and goals of NAMBLA back in the 1970s from a gay male couple in LA who found it absolutely horrifying, as did most of their friends.

    6. Macgawd says:

      I have a nephew who, from the time he was born, was treated like a little girl by my sister and her husband. Not allowed to play with boys, allowed to dress up like a girl/princess, and generally encouraged to act like a little girl at all times. It was no surprise to any of us when he came out, but I always wondered if he was gay because that’s the way he’s “wired”, or is he gay because his parents made him gay?

    7. DenverGregg says:

      an extremely violent and speedy backlash against all the varieties of sociopathic sexual degeneracy would be one of the best events in human history

    8. DEEBEE says:

      My theory is that all the letters after L G are trying to engage, perhaps clumsily, those two letters because they have been “successful” while the other letters not so much. The other letters tried the Drag Queen route but not successfully.

    9. Hairless Joe says:

      The revulsion that many normal people feel towards homosexuals seems to be largely justified. Not that we ever worried about that too much.

    10. Deoxy says:

      It’s like the LGBT community is determined to prove their most extreme critics correct, that they should be kept “in the closet”.

      “Oh, this doesn’t offend you enough to put us back in the closet? How about THIS? How about THIS? How about **THIS**?!?”

      Each time, pushing farther and farther from sanity.

      It’s almost like those societal rules were put in place for actual reasons besides hateful bigotry or something…..

    Leave a Reply