Shoe0nHead Horrified At The Left Celebrating Charlie Kirk’s Murder
Another ostensibly liberal YouTuber comes to the conclusion that lefties celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk are actively evil “atomized bug people” that can’t be reasoned with.
“Charlie Kirk had many bad takes over the years. Like for example, the two most popular quotes I see people posting are the one where he advocated for stoning gays and black women are too stupid to be pilots. But guess what? Both those things, the two most popular quotes people are posting to justify this guy being murdered, are out of context. But idiots like Stephen King ran with it, then later had to apologize for spreading misinformation about a dead man.”
“These people will build a straw man of you in their minds. They get so fucking mad about it that they celebrate the real you dying. Horrifying.”
“But more importantly, even if everything was in context, who cares? Oh, he said this. Oh, he said this. I don’t care. There are many things he said that I disagree with. There are many things he said that I think are bad. Who cares? It is just a fact that nothing he said warranted his life being taken away. This is America. We have freedom of speech here.”
“One person may have pulled the trigger, but then we saw the reaction of many.” She then plays a sampler of clips of lefties ecstatically celebrating Kirk’s murder, including one who argued that his wife and children should also be murdered.
“There were thousands of videos like that. Some of these people posting with their full names and faces with hundreds and thousands of likes, thousands of tweets celebrating it with half a million likes. And it’s important to remember that all of those likes are a real person. Millions of people in this country apparently believe the acceptable response to speech they don’t like is murder.”
“They were teachers, professors, doctors, HR workers, healthcare workers, nurses, pediatricians, people who work with kids, people’s classmates, roommates. They are teachers showing our children the gory, horrifying video of Charlie’s murder on repeat. The hippie-dippy in this house we believe shitlib mask was ripped off and underneath was nothing but psychopathic bloodlust.”
She says the only time she ever saw anyone on “the right” celebrate a death was a dozen Stormfront losers, who were immediately condemned by the entirety of the Internet.
“This is different. It’s never been like this before. It’s never been this much. It’s never been this brazen. Normal people have to log into like an alternate Twitter account where they can post their more ‘unorthodox’ opinions. And these people are out here full face, full name, like ‘Hell yeah! Murder!”
“The smug, unearned confidence these people have to be openly sociopathic with their full name and face because they live under the pathetic delusion of being on the right side of history needs to end.”
“They will blame you for your death because words are violence.”
“So them killing you is just self-defense. That’s why they are using Kyle Rittenhouse as some kind of gotcha. ‘Oh, if you don’t condone political violence, why do you support Kyle Rittenhouse?’ They fundamentally don’t see the difference between killing someone over speech and killing someone over self-defense because these are the same things to them.”
“Why are most of them women? Most of the people celebrating are women. Like, it’s a good like 80/20 ratio all over the internet. What is going on, ladies?”
“Basically, the whole country is shook because last year they realized how many people would celebrate the murder of a president, and this year they realized how many people would celebrate the murder of them.”
“This is all the inevitable conclusion of the punch a Nazi thing from like 2017. Do you guys remember that? We always knew it was a slippery slope. That’s why we were against it. And they always say this dumb shit. Like, if you don’t want to be called a Nazi, stop being a Nazi. Even a congressman from my state, New York, was like, ‘Oh, if you want to stop being called a fascist, you should stop being a fascist.’ Yeah, that’s great. Except you’ve called everyone and their mother a fascist and a Nazi for the past like 15 years.”
She then reads a long, long list of all the things she’s personally being a called a Nazi or fascist over, including “making fun of Joe Biden eating ice cream.”
Quoting Blair White: “They don’t kill you because you’re a Nazi. They call you a Nazi so they can kill you.”
“I’ve been to the TPUSA AmericaFest in 2021. I actually went there planning to make a video making fun of it, but I had so much fun and met so many friends that I’m still friends with to this day.”
After Kirk was killed “I kept going to every single like lefty, liberal, left-wing person I know and like checking out what they have been saying about this. And besides maybe like four or five, every single one was being an unhinged psychopath about this, or saying some backhanded shit like ‘This is why we need gun control,’ which, first of all, we were just watching a whole bunch of people celebrate killing someone over political differences. You are never taking our guns now. That that is not happening.”
“I felt like I was in the middle of the ocean. I was trying to, like, grasp onto a flotation device, checking all of these accounts for their take. Like ‘Be normal, be normal.’ Nothing. Nobody. I’m just drowning in a sea of evil, apparently. Maybe I was just blind up until now.” So basically it’s as bad as conservatives have been saying for the last decade.
“This is how they would react to me, my family, my friends, you, your family, your friends that have ever stepped out of line from the nebulous, ever-changing definition of progressive.”
“These are people I thought were levelheaded. They were left-wing, but you know, like they were one of the good ones. Like you can joke with them. You know, they weren’t those like woke SJWs. Like they were cool. We can disagree and still be friends.”
“You know, your friend wouldn’t celebrate you being murdered, of course. But if they would celebrate an exact clone of you that wasn’t you, that had all the same opinions, or some of the opinions that you have, if they would celebrate that clone being murdered, they’re not your friend.”
“It’s just sick.”
“I would rather live in a world full of Charlie Kirks who would sit down and debate than a world full of people who agree with me, but would murder people who don’t.”
“You can’t say, ‘What if that was your dad or your brother getting killed for their opinions?’ Because they’ve already cut those people off. They’ve already cut those people off out of their lives. And posting videos and pictures of Charlie’s wife and young kids will not move these people at all because they hate their lives. They hate their families. They are atomized bug people.”
“From a political standpoint, not even a personal human standpoint, why are you celebrating the most popular college Gen Z political pundit dying? Like, why are you celebrating him becoming a martyr? Say goodbye to that young male vote. All the liberal Joe Rogans in the world are not fixing this.”
She ends with a Trumpism: “Thank you for your attention to this matter.”
“Why are most of them women? Most of the people celebrating are women. Like, it’s a good like 80/20 ratio all over the internet. What is going on, ladies?”
The Delphic Omphalos of most American chaos is feminism. It is the Original Grievance mafia motivated of, by, and for feefees. Most everything is downstream from it, and the sooner people understand that the sooner people can disregard its thought leaders outright and begin healing.
“If a man lies with a male as one lies with a woman, the two of them have done an abhorrent thing; they shall be put to death—and they retain the bloodguilt.”
Under the Law of Moses, the “abhorrent thing” was both ethically wrong and punished by death; under the US law code, the “abhorrent thing” is legally protected.
The Apostle Paul issues this command:“Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad… he is God’s servant for your good.”
To stone those who practice the “abhorrent thing” would be an affront to the governing authorities and would bring retribution.
However, for a Persian to stone those who practice the “abhorrent thing” would be defensible, being congruent with their law code, which combines elements of Moses with the authority of the state.
In short, for sodomy to be a capital offense, we must submit to sharia. I doubt Charlie Kirk would trade US law for that of the Muslims, so we must patiently endure the lesser of two evils until such time as Sodomites decide to repent.
The Overton Window has shifted dramatically for Charlie Kirk to be considered anything but bland and uncontroversial. We need to discover how a plain vanilla public figure was transformed into a malignant monster.
The purpose of civilization is to protect innocent life. If innocuous political commentary triggers assassination rage, we have lost the protection of civil authorities and are individually obliged to confront and resist those who would silence us through censorship or threat of death.
Free speech is the health of a Republic and it has many enemies. Speak up now, with firmness and conviction. Denounce those who celebrate the murder of a innocent man and defend the innocence of those who would emulate Charlie Kirk.
I will answer my own question. Charlie Kirk dared to bring religion into the public sphere.
If he had prayed in his closet, sang in his church choir and preached in his pulpit far from public scrutiny, he may have remained unmolested. His fatal error was to reject pietistic quietism, which is the only religious expression on offer.
To exhibit your faith publicly is forbidden as it could readily lead to Theocracy.
Under the First Amendment, you are free to speak, but not about religious topics that may be interpreted as being mean-spirited. You are free to assemble, but not if the purpose of the meeting is to make converts or defend the principles upon which the Republic is founded,
which were racist. You are free to publish books and periodicals but if you post an on-line article that argues for the lasting distinction between biological males and females you will be deplatformed.
If you do all the above publicly, you will be shot.
There has been a transvaluation of values and the Sodomites who formerly practiced their
shameful deeds in private are now parading in the public square while the Christian must withdraw into the chapel.
Pietistic quietism signals the surrender of culture to the barbarians. We must recapture the moral high ground, which is now held by “renegade priests and treacherous young witches”. Your heats must have the courage for the Changing of the Guard.
“In the long run our human mind cannot forsake its oneness of impulse. The track
which it beats in matters of religion, is almost spontaneously followed in social and political affairs.” Abraham Kuyper
Religion must regain pride of place in the public square if civil society and political liberty are to endure.
I found most notable the segment at 15:35 in the video, where Shoe discovers, and is visibly shaken to describe, the betrayal inherent in leftist thinking. Yes, they really *do* want to kill you. They will kill *you*.
That feeling of betrayal (transing his son in his case) that flipped Elon Musk to MAGA.
“I will answer my own question. Charlie Kirk dared to bring religion into the public sphere.”
For this, your beloved Ukrainian Nazis put Kirk on the Myrotvorets “Kill List”. They took that entry down immediately after he was assassinated, realizing there would be an ugly backlash. Other Ukrainians have been celebrating Kirk’s assassination with even greater enthusiasm than the mentally ill American left.
The Russian Orthodox Church, which you have slandered repeatedly, formally honored Charlie Kirk, praising his life and Christian mission as an enduring example. In their statement ‘The Example of Charlie Kirk is a Lesson for Us’, the church described the Turning Point USA founder’s work as a beacon against what it called “the march of the destroyer.”
Metropolitan Tikhon Shevkunov, President Vladimir Putin’s spiritual adviser, praised the late American conservative Charlie Kirk as a martyr, saying his death could inspire Russian missionaries. Writing on the Orthodox website, Shevkunov called Kirk’s killing “his greatest sermon and the pinnacle of his mission.” He lauded Kirk’s Christian faith and conservative principles, values Putin has increasingly embraced to counter Western liberalism.
“Why are most of them women? Most of the people celebrating are women. Like, it’s a good like 80/20 ratio all over the internet. What is going on, ladies?”
The Delphic Omphalos of most American chaos is feminism. It is the Original Grievance mafia motivated of, by, and for feefees. Most everything is downstream from it, and the sooner people understand that the sooner people can disregard its thought leaders outright and begin healing.
“[H]e advocated for stoning gays (sic).”
וְאִ֗ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֨ר יִשְׁכַּ֤ב אֶת־זָכָר֙ מִשְׁכְּבֵ֣י אִשָּׁ֔ה תּוֹעֵבָ֥ה עָשׂ֖וּ שְׁנֵיהֶ֑ם מ֥וֹת יוּמָ֖תוּ דְּמֵיהֶ֥ם בָּֽם׃
“If a man lies with a male as one lies with a woman, the two of them have done an abhorrent thing; they shall be put to death—and they retain the bloodguilt.”
Under the Law of Moses, the “abhorrent thing” was both ethically wrong and punished by death; under the US law code, the “abhorrent thing” is legally protected.
The Apostle Paul issues this command:“Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad… he is God’s servant for your good.”
To stone those who practice the “abhorrent thing” would be an affront to the governing authorities and would bring retribution.
However, for a Persian to stone those who practice the “abhorrent thing” would be defensible, being congruent with their law code, which combines elements of Moses with the authority of the state.
In short, for sodomy to be a capital offense, we must submit to sharia. I doubt Charlie Kirk would trade US law for that of the Muslims, so we must patiently endure the lesser of two evils until such time as Sodomites decide to repent.
The Overton Window has shifted dramatically for Charlie Kirk to be considered anything but bland and uncontroversial. We need to discover how a plain vanilla public figure was transformed into a malignant monster.
The purpose of civilization is to protect innocent life. If innocuous political commentary triggers assassination rage, we have lost the protection of civil authorities and are individually obliged to confront and resist those who would silence us through censorship or threat of death.
Free speech is the health of a Republic and it has many enemies. Speak up now, with firmness and conviction. Denounce those who celebrate the murder of a innocent man and defend the innocence of those who would emulate Charlie Kirk.
I will answer my own question. Charlie Kirk dared to bring religion into the public sphere.
If he had prayed in his closet, sang in his church choir and preached in his pulpit far from public scrutiny, he may have remained unmolested. His fatal error was to reject pietistic quietism, which is the only religious expression on offer.
To exhibit your faith publicly is forbidden as it could readily lead to Theocracy.
Under the First Amendment, you are free to speak, but not about religious topics that may be interpreted as being mean-spirited. You are free to assemble, but not if the purpose of the meeting is to make converts or defend the principles upon which the Republic is founded,
which were racist. You are free to publish books and periodicals but if you post an on-line article that argues for the lasting distinction between biological males and females you will be deplatformed.
If you do all the above publicly, you will be shot.
There has been a transvaluation of values and the Sodomites who formerly practiced their
shameful deeds in private are now parading in the public square while the Christian must withdraw into the chapel.
Pietistic quietism signals the surrender of culture to the barbarians. We must recapture the moral high ground, which is now held by “renegade priests and treacherous young witches”. Your heats must have the courage for the Changing of the Guard.
“In the long run our human mind cannot forsake its oneness of impulse. The track
which it beats in matters of religion, is almost spontaneously followed in social and political affairs.” Abraham Kuyper
Religion must regain pride of place in the public square if civil society and political liberty are to endure.
I found most notable the segment at 15:35 in the video, where Shoe discovers, and is visibly shaken to describe, the betrayal inherent in leftist thinking. Yes, they really *do* want to kill you. They will kill *you*.
That feeling of betrayal (transing his son in his case) that flipped Elon Musk to MAGA.
“I will answer my own question. Charlie Kirk dared to bring religion into the public sphere.”
For this, your beloved Ukrainian Nazis put Kirk on the Myrotvorets “Kill List”. They took that entry down immediately after he was assassinated, realizing there would be an ugly backlash. Other Ukrainians have been celebrating Kirk’s assassination with even greater enthusiasm than the mentally ill American left.
The Russian Orthodox Church, which you have slandered repeatedly, formally honored Charlie Kirk, praising his life and Christian mission as an enduring example. In their statement ‘The Example of Charlie Kirk is a Lesson for Us’, the church described the Turning Point USA founder’s work as a beacon against what it called “the march of the destroyer.”
Metropolitan Tikhon Shevkunov, President Vladimir Putin’s spiritual adviser, praised the late American conservative Charlie Kirk as a martyr, saying his death could inspire Russian missionaries. Writing on the Orthodox website, Shevkunov called Kirk’s killing “his greatest sermon and the pinnacle of his mission.” He lauded Kirk’s Christian faith and conservative principles, values Putin has increasingly embraced to counter Western liberalism.