Since we’re in the home stretch, here’s a quick roundup of various election news:
Posts Tagged ‘Elections’
Election News Roundup for October 27, 2014
Monday, October 27th, 2014Adventures With Wendy Davis Social Media
Wednesday, October 22nd, 2014The fun just won’t stop!
So first the Wendy Davis Twitter account posted this:
Go #GenWendy! MT @Lisa_in_Austin My friends and I just voted for a candidate who stands for ALL Texans! #MyTexasVotes pic.twitter.com/wsjArAKu9d
— Wendy Davis (@WendyDavisTexas) October 21, 2014
Oops!
VRCRs take on Virginia Beach for the @CRFV deployment! pic.twitter.com/e5LRw5QVz0
— VTCRs (@VTCRs) September 20, 2014
.@WendyDavisTexas is cray cray. RT @lyndseyfifield: OH. MY. GOD. pic.twitter.com/85Gv8ZwUFo cc @gusportela”
— Pam Swan (@pjswan) October 22, 2014
Then hilarity ensued.
My friends and I just voted for @WendyDavisTexas!!! #GoWendy @AlexandraCSmith @AJDelgado13 @CRFV pic.twitter.com/iYVwsb5MLl
— Antonio Martinez (@djtechchicago) October 22, 2014
Funny! Some of MY friends voted for @WendyDavisTexas today as well! #tcgov #tcot @WendyDavisTruth pic.twitter.com/C7BOphSgT5
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) October 22, 2014
Anyone can make a mistake. But as of this writing, the Wendy Davis Twitter account still hasn’t apologized for stealing a Virginia college Republican photo and claiming it as their own…
Wendy Davis Puts Down Jackhammer, Revs Up Backhoe
Wednesday, October 22nd, 2014You’ve really got to hand it to the Wendy Davis campaign. Every time you think they’ve sunk as low as they possibly can, they break out the heavy construction equipment and start digging.
Now the campaign who asked if the guy in a wheelchair hated the disabled is wondering whether the guy married to a Mexican-American would ban interracial marriage.
The reviews are in, and they’re not pretty:
When I was in TX, it was hard to miss billboards showing Abbott with his Mex-Am wife. Davis’s “interracial marriage ban” attack is crazy.
— daveweigel (@daveweigel) October 20, 2014
Then of course there’s the whole attacking Abbott over dildos issue. Look, from a libertarian viewpoint I happen to agree that the state’s rarely-enforced sex toy ban is pointless in the Internet age. However: 1.) Davis still doesn’t seem to understand what an Attorney General’s job is, and 2.) Everyone who would vote for Wendy Davis over dildos was already voting for her, so talking about it wins her no additional votes, and probably loses her a few among older voters.
I’m sure there have been more incompetent campaigns than Davis’, but I’m wracking my brain trying to think of one so high-profile and well-funded that crashed and burned so spectacularly, or that managed to alienate so many people in such a short period of time with such sleazy and counterproductive tactics.
Its almost as if Democrats know her campaign is doomed, and have encouraged this offensive incompetence as a means of distracting attention from their deeply flawed senate race candidates in other states.
“I suspect her candidacy is an elaborate prank pulled on the people of Texas, and she is actually a middle-aged actress from southern California hired by Funny or Die.” [Disagree: There’s precious little evidence the Funny or Die people are capable of coming up with something this funny.]
Maybe she has a secret bet with a billionaire (ala Brewster’s Millions) that she can run a campaign so unbelievably sleazy and incompetent that she can get The Nation to endorse Greg Abbott. Or maybe she’s a Karl Rove plant.
Also this:
Dear @WendyDavisTexas: Unlike the Voting Rights Act of 1964, the DREAM Act was never passed, thus there is nothing to "repeal." @PolitiBunny
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) October 22, 2014
(Would have had this up yesterday, but too much news puffing up…)
LinkSwarm for October 20, 2014
Monday, October 20th, 2014I was at a writer’s workshop this weekend, so it’s slow going getting back into the swing of things:
Ebola might seem scary, but you'll be okay as long as you follow the established protocols for protecting @BarackObama from criticism.
— Jim Treacher (@jtLOL) October 17, 2014
Wendy Davis Stops Digging, Gets Out Jackhammer
Tuesday, October 14th, 2014Once again, the Wendy Davis campaign is the gift that keeps giving to conservative pundits. It’s all over but the voting at this point, but Davis’ thrashing, flailing campaign is so ham-handed and tone-deaf that she keeps staying in the news for all the wrong reasons.
First came this amazingly stupid ad:
Reaction was swift and pretty much universally negative.
Fox: “Absolute desperation…catastrophic.”
Even ultra-lefty Mother Jones was appalled: “Wendy Davis just released an ad attacking Greg Abbott, her opponent for governor in Texas, which is, to be blunt, bullshit. It’s offensive and nasty and it shouldn’t exist. She’s basically calling Abbott a cripple.”
MSNBC? “A huge blunder.” “Every Democrat I met down there was appalled.” “She’s gonna get creamed.”
Indeed, the ad is so ill-considered and offensive that it may derail what I thought would be her next gig: a position at MSNBC.
As Hot Air noted: “Perhaps Wendy Davis isn’t familiar with what an Attorney General does.”
Also note that this ad didn’t come from an outside group or SuperPAC, this came from the Davis campaign itself. Her fingerprints are all over it and she has no deniability.
So what did Davis do after this nigh-on universal condemnation? She doubled down on stupid.
"I love cripples! Look at all these fucking cripples! Goddamit I'm a people person!" pic.twitter.com/XCLA5xPmLX
— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) October 13, 2014
And this happened:
Holy shit, watch @WendyDavisTexas's personal Hodor drag a disabled person across the stage https://t.co/IgIhVFEsdQ
— L (@OrwellForks) October 13, 2014
And Abbott? He’s just shrugging over the whole thing, and why shouldn’t he? Never interrupt your opponent when they’re in the process of committing suicide. Also note that he eschewed the frequent liberal tactic of calling a press conference to talk about how offended he is. When you’re a front-runner with a comfortable lead and a big money advantage, you don’t need such cheap theatrics.
Reminder: Mark Udall is a Gun Grabber
Wednesday, October 8th, 2014After his fellow Democrats went down in flames during the recall election, Colorado’s incumbent Senator would probably prefer you forget his own support for gun control,. After all, his own campaign website is silent on the issue, and his Senate website includes the usual insincere blather about supporting the Second Amendment.
Now is a good time to remind voters that Udall has been significantly to the left of even his fellow democratic senators in pushing for gun control:
Colorado’s Mark Udall indicated support for two key proposals of President Obama’s legislative package to reduce gun violence, taking a stand slightly to the left of his fellow Senate Democrats who also are up for re-election in 2014.
The Colorado Democrat told Denver’s FOX affiliate last month he supports a renewal of the assault-weapons bans that lapsed in 2004.
After Obama rolled out his legislative proposals and signed executive orders Wednesday, Udall released a statement that indicates he also supports a ban on magazine clips of more than 10 bullets.
In other words, Udall favors, at the national level, the same legislation that drove Magpul out of the state.
Udall also engages in the deliberately deceptive labeling of modern sporting rifles (AR-15, etc.) as “military-grade weapons”.
Further signs of his gun-grabbing bona fides is the fact that Udall is receiving lots of money from out-of-state gun control groups. Udall has also been endorsed by the latest incarnation of Bloomberg’s anti-gun group.
All of which goes a long way toward explaining why Udall received a D from the NRAPVF.
Any Colorado supporter of the Second Amendment should vote for Cory Gardner over Udall in November.
Why Mary Landrieu Sucks
Monday, October 6th, 2014(I was trying to think of a more clever headline, but let’s just go with the obvious, shall we?)
One of the last, best hopes for Obama and Harry Reid to keep control of the senate is Louisiana incumbent Mary Landrieu hanging on to one of the last Democratic seats in the south.
Let’s discuss just the highlights of why Louisianans should vote for Rep. Bill Cassidy over Landrieu. The latest polls show Casserly up, but at under 50%. (And remember that the Democrat’s ground game surprised a lot of pollsters in 2012.)
ObamaCare
Remember how Mary Landrieu was one of the deciding votes for ObamaCare in the senate?
Now she’s making all sorts of noises about protecting Louisiana citizens from the effects of the law she passed. Gee, maybe shouldn’t have bragged about how she didn’t need to read the bill:
Contrary to popular belief and what FOX News said, people here read the bills. For 40 years we read the bills. But we did not have to read the bills; all we had to do was look at the faces of kids dying of cancer who had no way to get cured… I don’t need to read a bill. I listen to my constituents. That is what this is about.
Somehow I doubt she’s going to listen to those whose policies were canceled, or whose prices doubled or tripled, thanks to ObamaCare. Maybe that’s why 59% of Louisianans oppose ObamaCare, and more than half disapprove of Landrieu’s performance.
And Landrieu says she would vote for ObamaCare again. Maybe that’s why the National Federation of Independent Business has endorsed Cassidy. (More on Landrieu’s ObamaCare support here.)
Poor Second Amendment Record
Landrieu got a D from the NRA-PVF on her gun rights voting record. Despite crowing about her Second Amendment support, she has voted for several gun control measures. While not as hostile to Second Amendment rights as Nancy Pelosi or Andrew Cuomo, she’s betrayed gun rights enough for Louisiana gun owners to be leery of her.
No less than Michelle Obama said that re-electing Landrieu was critical for gun control efforts. And remember: When push comes to shove, there’s no such thing as a pro-gun Democrat. I guarantee you that Mary Landrieu is no more “pro-gun” than Bart Stupak was pro-life.
Ignoring Louisiana
Mary Landrieu doesn’t actually live in Louisiana:
In Washington, Sen. Mary Landrieu lives in a stately, $2.5 million brick manse she and her husband built on Capitol Hill.
Here in Louisiana, however, the Democrat does not have a home of her own. She is registered to vote at a large bungalow in New Orleans that her parents have lived in for many decades, according to a Washington Post review of Landrieu’s federal financial disclosures and local property and voting records.
On a statement of candidacy Landrieu filed with the Federal Election Commission in January, she listed her Capitol Hill home as her address.
It takes a special kind of stupid to put your D.C. mansion down as your home address.
Finally, for a hard-hitting look at how Mary Landrieu has ignored her constituents, take a look at this ad:
Reminder: Louisiana has system whereby the top two candidates will go to a runoff on December 6. Unless Bill Cassidy is able to win outright in November (which seems doubtful at this point), he’s going to need help in the runoff. And if the control of the senate hangs in the balance, you know Democrats will pull out all the stops to keep Harry Reid in power…
In Which I Pwn Liberal Tweeter @2miche
Tuesday, September 30th, 2014“Daddy, what did you do during the Twitter Wars?”
I offer up the following example of countering the usual “The evil Koch brothers outspend everyone!” liberal talking point, and how quickly Democrats turn tale and run when faced with actual facts. All tweets verbatim. (Including a few of my own typos. Mea culpa. I plead Twitter.)
Why Harry Reid is attacking Koch: Big money dem donors will spend more in NC, CO and IA than all RNC spend combined: http://t.co/1uYMsytjE2
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 29, 2014
@BattleSwarmBlog You're an idiot – dems can't begin to to match the dirty KOCH and ADELSON
— michelle elson (@2miche) September 29, 2014
Except that there are 58 bigger donors than #Koch, mostly #Democratic Party donors: https://t.co/S9GzfT1boQ @2miche
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 30, 2014
@BattleSwarmBlog but they don't give as much, chico
— michelle elson (@2miche) September 30, 2014
Did you not read they link? Donoros to #Democrats gave much more than Koch: https://t.co/S9GzfT1boQ @2miche
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 30, 2014
Want to go over them line by line? ActBlue alone gave out six times in much in donations as Koch. https://t.co/S9GzfT1boQ @2miche #tcot
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 30, 2014
Not to mention all the other 58 donors who donated more than Koch, most to Democrats https://t.co/S9GzfT1boQ @2miche #tcot
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 30, 2014
@BattleSwarmBlog @2miche She was told there would be no math
— Data Dave (@DaveHimrich) September 30, 2014
presumably it will take some time for @2miche to grapple with the fact she's objectively wrong. https://t.co/S9GzfT1boQ @DaveHimrich
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 30, 2014
@BattleSwarmBlog @DaveHimrich I block teabillies – ciao baby
— michelle elson (@2miche) September 30, 2014
So in other words, you barg into my timeline, make a demonstrable false statement, then get pissy when you get pwned. @2miche @DaveHimrich
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 30, 2014
The easy way to prevent this is to refrain from making statements that are objectively false. @2miche @DaveHimrich
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 30, 2014
The other easy way to prevent this is to not throw a little fit over being called out on your objctive falsehood. @2miche @DaveHimrich
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 30, 2014
You can stamp your little heels all you want, but when you said no Democrats gave as much as #Koch, you spoke lies. @2miche @DaveHimrich
— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 30, 2014
And then I posted this:
Not in this thread, but worth noting for the future, is how liberals like to bring up Koch “dark money” donations, but then conveniently omit mention of left-leaning dark money operations like Patriot Majority USA. Indeed, as of November last year, liberal money made up 70% of dark money spending.
Will Colorado Crapweasel John Hickenlooper Get Booted From the Governor’s Mansion?
Wednesday, September 24th, 2014A new Quinnipiac poll shows Colorado’s incumbent Democratic governor John Hickenlooper down ten points to Republican challenger Bob Beauprez.
Michelle Malkin explains why:
It was Hickenlooper who caved to East Coast gun-control zealots and partisan White House lobbying. As Democratic state legislators rigged the hearing process, snubbed Colorado constituents and insulted Second Amendment-supporting women during hearings last year, Hickenlooper was chumming it up on the phone with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Vice President Joe Biden.
You may remember how well ramming through gun control initiatives worked out for Colorado Democrats: Two Democratic state senators got recalled and a third resigned rather than face a recall election.
Hickenlooper was a key player in getting those unpopular measures passed, and this year he may pay the price for it, despite his incredulity at the issue being held against him. (“”What the f—? I apologized!”)
For all the talk of Colorado turning blue, keep in mind that Obama only won 51.5% of the vote in 2012. And if Hickenlooper loses, that will leave exactly one Democratic governor “left standing between California and Missouri.”
Even a Washington Post piece that poo-poos the Quinnipiac poll notes that Hickenlooper has “refused to make clear his position.” They were talking about his position on the Keystone pipeline, but the description applies just as well to a number of other issues Hickenlooper has refused to take a stand on. Long-time political observers know exactly what such reticence indicates: A liberal politician unwilling to let voters know exactly how far-left and out of touch his core convictions are compared to theirs.
One of those issues is flip-flopping on whether to allow the execution of a convicted murderer:
Last month, Bob Crowell — father of 19-year-old murder victim Sylvia Crowell — blasted Hickenlooper for indefinitely delaying the execution of mass murderer Nathan Dunlap. When Hickenlooper confided in CNN that he might grant Dunlap clemency if he loses in November, Crowell didn’t mince words. “I think that’s the coward’s way out, and I view John Hickenlooper as a coward.”
After the recall, I wrote “Bottom line: If you’re a politician, and you choose to listen to Nurse Bloomberg rather than your constituents, you will be replaced.” I suspect that John Hickenlooper is about to learn that, good and hard.