Posts Tagged ‘Title VII’

Federal Court Strikes Down Biden Tranny Business Guidelines

Monday, May 19th, 2025

These days it feels like a revolutionary act to simply notice basic reality, but that’s what U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk did in striking down the Biden Administration’s tranny mandates on businesses.

A federal court in Texas has issued an order to vacate portions of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) 2024 Enforcement Guidance that interpreted Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to mandate accommodations for transgender employees related to pronouns, dress codes, and bathroom access.

The EEOC “Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace” was issued in 2024, and created enforcements for how sex-based harassment includes harassment based on “sexual orientation or gender identity,” including misusing pronouns and “the denial of access to a bathroom… consistent with the individual’s gender identity.”

The social justice left isn’t just at war with Christianity, American patriotism and traditional sex roles, but with biological reality itself. In the future, the pronoun police and sex as social construct idiocy will be seen as an inexplicable madness of our age the same way that Pyramid Power and the Bermuda Triangle are exemplifiers of the craziness of the 1970s.

Soon after the guidance was issued, Attorney General Ken Paxton and the conservative Heritage Foundation filed suit, arguing that it unlawfully compels employers to adopt “transgender” mandates under the threat of discrimination or harassment lawsuits.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk issued the order last Thursday, finding that the guidance “contravenes Title VII’s plain text by expanding the scope of ‘sex’ beyond the biological binary: male and female.”

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 created the EEOC to enforce the prohibitions on employment discrimination.

Paxton’s lawsuit argued that the EEOC guidance “relies on an intentional misrepresentation of the Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.” He added that the decision “did not discuss how such employers must accommodate such employees in the workplace.”

Kacsmaryk notes in his ruling that “Bostock does not authorize the Guidance’s expansion of Title VII ‘sex’ to include new categories or classes.”

Shortly after entering office in January, President Donald Trump issued an executive order (EO) titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” which instructed the U.S. attorney general to “issue guidance to ensure the freedom to express the binary nature of sex and the right to single-sex spaces in workplaces and federally funded entities covered by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”

Gov. Greg Abbott has also issued a letter to state agency heads directing them to “comply with the law and the biological reality that there are only two sexes — male and female.”

Theoretically, anything a previous administration did through executive fiat should be capable of being undone by the next administration the same way, but as the recent efforts of rogue lefty judges to thwart Trump47 from doing just that prove, additional weapons are needed to reign in the radical social justice excesses of the Biden regime. So it’s good to have a judicial ruling that 2+2=4, the sun rises in the East, and, yes, there are two biological sexes, male and female, and a man claiming he’s a woman doesn’t magically make him one.

Paxton Sues Biden Administration Over Transexual Madness Yet Again

Sunday, August 18th, 2024

Yesterday I covered the Supreme Court blocking the Biden Administrations unilateral rewrite of Title IX by executive fiat to impose transexism on colleges, but that’s not the only place Democrats are trying to impose their twisted gender ideology. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issuing the Biden Administration over their attempt to impose their gender ideology in Title VII.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is once again challenging the Biden administration, filing a lawsuit against the federal government in an effort to block enforcement guidance that the state argues unlawfully compels employers to adopt “transgender” mandates under the threat of discrimination or harassment lawsuits.

Specifically, the lawsuit points to a change the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) made in April to the “enforcement guidance on harassment in the workplace” that now includes the definition of “gender identity” under the category of “sex.”

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 created the EEOC to enforce the prohibitions on employment discrimination.

The EEOC guidelines explain how sex-based harassment includes harassment based on “sexual orientation or gender identity,” including misusing pronouns and “the denial of access to a bathroom… consistent with the individual’s gender identity.”

Forcing pronouns on people and making the peasants acquiesce to allowing men in women’s restrooms seems like a huge goal for the Democratic Party, one they’re been relentlessly pushing for over the last decade.

Paxton argues that the EEOC guidance “relies on an intentional misrepresentation of the Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.” He adds that the decision “did not discuss how such employers must accommodate such employees in the workplace.”

In Bostock v. Clayton County, the court ruled that firing someone for being “gay or transgender” is a form of sex discrimination, but Paxton argues that this does not extend to accommodations such as pronoun use, bathroom access, or dress codes.

“Thus,” the lawsuit states, “EEOC may not interpret Title VII to require employers to comply with the Pronoun Accommodation, the Bathroom Accommodation, or the Dress Code Accommodation.”

The lawsuit asks the court to declare the 2024 guidance unlawful, invalidate it, and permanently prevent its enforcement, as well as cover their legal costs and provide any additional relief deemed appropriate by the court.

Paxton is joined by the conservative Heritage Foundation in this legal challenge.

“The Biden-Harris Administration is attempting yet again to rewrite federal law through undemocratic and illegal agency action,” Paxton wrote in a statement.

“This time, they are unlawfully weaponizing the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in an attempt to force private businesses and States to implement ‘transgender’ mandates — and Texas is suing to stop them.”

Pronouns and tranny bathrooms are popular with far leftwing activists, but deeply unpopular with ordinary American citizens. No voters outside of San Francisco (and possibly not even there) would vote for these policies, so the Democratic Party’s activist cadres must impose them by stealth via judicial and executive fiat. Just as with the Title IX cases, expect this radical activist regulation to wither under judicial scrutiny.