Candidate John Gordon Answers Questions About the House District 52 Race

March 31st, 2010

Yesterday I posted Texas House District 52 runoff candidate Larry Gonzales’ answers to questions about the race. Today we post answers from the other candidate, John Gordon. My questions are in italics below, followed by his answers.

1. Do you think you’re a more conservative candidate than Larry Gonzales, and if so how?

Yes, I (John Gordon) am the person with a true record of conservative actions in Williamson County.

Larry is just talk – like Obama.

When the RRISD was putting forth a wasteful $350,000,000 bond election in 2005, I led the opposition against the “city and school district elite” who wanted the excessive spending and defeated the bond proposal by 62% to 38%. Larry supported the excessive spending.

When Round Rock city leaders tried to extend late night drinking on school nights to 2:00 AM, I organized and led the petition drive that forced reconsideration and repeal. San Marcos did not have my leadership and they extended the hours resulting in a doubling of DUI’s and a tripling of PI. Larry did nothing but support city leaders on extending late night drinking.

When TxDOT tried to ram SH 130 through central Round Rock, supported by big developers on the north side of Round Rock, I led the four year effort of 6 neighborhoods that forced TX DOT to reroute SH 130 east between Round Rock and Hutto creating a better economic engine for the area and stopping the damage to neighborhoods that would have been caused by a badly designed highway. Larry did nothing.

As Republican County Chairman, I directed placement of the Right to Life plank in the Williamson County Republican Platform for the first time. I help fund the Hope Pregnancy Crisis Center in Williamson County.

I helped lead the public effort in 1996 that voted down by 68% to 32% a $0.06 property tax increase to fund a baseball stadium in Round Rock. Larry supports public subsidizes of sports facilities.

2. On which three issues you think do you think the policies differences between yourself and Gonzales are most clear? How?

See the numerous examples above – my conservative philosophy and commitment to benefitting people is proven by my deeds and actions. Larry just goes along with the insiders.

3. Who are some of the thinkers and books that have influenced your political philosophy?

Bible, US Constitution, my grandfather and father – good conservative common sense – a good engineering background.

4. What tax and budget policies would you pursue going forward in the Texas legislature?

No increase in taxes.

Get rid of the corporate income tax (franchise tax) which is a productivity tax. It makes Texas businesses less competitive nationally and internationally.

The “Fair Tax” plan nationally is a direct example of what Texas should do versus income (productivity) taxes. Larry was helping the Legislature when they went the wrong direction in tax policy.

Spend only what we take in.

5. How should Texas build and maintain its road infrastructure going forward? Do you approve of building new toll roads? If so, should they be built the state, or by private entities under some sort of toll-sharing agreement?

Better “cost” engineering to take out the extravagance in highway design.

Capture all the highway funding instead of allowing funds to be diverted to non-road building purposes.

Streamline the design/licensing/EIS process and challenge wasteful Endangered Species regulations.

Promote early purchase of right-of-ways with minimized EIS licensing requirements.

Private construction/maintenance contracts but with state ownership to reduce costs.

Tolls used to pay off the projects which generate the tolls, then reduce the tolls to low nominal level just to support maintenance activities.

6. Do you believe that Proposition 2, Proposition 3 and Proposition 11, passed as part of the 2009 Constitutional Amendments, provide adequate protections against post-Kelo eminent domain abuses? If not, what more should the legislature do to address this issue?

Give the new propositions time to take effect and then observe the results.

7. Do you consider yourself a member of the Tea Party movement, and/or do you seek their support?

I was a Tea Party force all by myself before anyone started going around saying Taxed Enough Already. Look at my answer to question #1. I have organized and led voter revolts over the last 30 years that have probably reduced or saved property owners up to $0.35/ hundred in property taxes.

a. Blocked Cap Metro sales tax in 1983 which allowed Round Rock and Georgetown to use 0.5% sales tax to reduce property taxes.

b. Fought off Austin Community College taxes of $0.10/ hundred for 25 years.

c. Blocked the $0.06/ hundred property tax to fund a baseball stadium.

d. Defeated a wasteful $350,000,000 bond election in 2005 and then showed the ISD how to cut out $83,000,000 and get an extra elementary school out of the reduced spending – effect = $0.05/ hundred property tax savings. (The second wasteful RRISD bond election I helped defeat)

8. Your recent mailings have made much of the Gonzalez campaign receiving the majority of contributions from Houston-area developer Bob Perry. Why do you think this is a significant issue?

— and you don’t think one “special interest” individual giving Larry Gonzales $90,000 which funded his entire $81,000 of primary spending isn’t a big deal? How about the appearance of being “bought and paid for”. I am sure that the average citizen in Taylor or Hutto might question where Larry’s loyalties lie. How about common sense – is being funded by one guy out of Houston using common sense?

Go talk to the farmer in Thrall and ask if the funding smells fishy.

9. The Williamson County Sun has evidently reported that you failed to turn in your campaign finance report on time, and have refused to pay the associated late fine. Is this true, and if so, why are your refusing to pay the fine?

I have a problem with regulatory/administrative agencies not doing a good job or not using common sense – TxDot, PUC, Ethics Commission.

To prove a point, last January 16, 2009, at the end of the previous (2008) campaign season, I filed a zero-income, zero-expenditure candidate statement 8 hours after the deadline. They want to fine me $500.00

Yet, their campaign computer report form is so defective that they have no totals or accumulation nor do they check to see if candidates are showing properly accounted report totals. One campaign that I manually computed the totals on was off by nearly $250,000 in accounting for income and loans minus expenditures equaling cash on hand. The Ethics Commission campaign reporting form needs to be seriously upgraded.

So if they want to press me to get the $500, they are going to have to answer quite a few questions. What I hope they do is realize the defects in their computerized campaign I & E reporting software and fix it and set up standard levels for their fines.

Oh by the way, the Ethics Commission has the ability any time they desire to waive the fine as trivial – I just have to say that I fell asleep or submit some other lame excuse that I made a mistake.

How about the Ethics Commission, in a burst of common sense, going ahead and deciding on their own that a zero-income, zero-expenditure report filed 8 hours late is a trivial matter and not damaging the public interest in any way?

10. Any other thoughts on the race or politics in general you’d care to share with readers?

For thirty years I have stood firm for conservative values over insider relationships and special interest deals. My conservative stances have generated insiders who do not want me to be elected because they know that I can use the word “NO” when conservative values and the public interest are being threatened. Larry Gonzales is the consummate insider. The Republican Party has lost favor with conservatives because the “insiders” have talked a great line but have worked to support each others’ special interests.

The April 13 question is – who will Republican voters from District 52 select as their nominee, the experienced, tough, conservative warhorse John Gordon or the young, slick-talking, back-slapping insider Larry Gonzales?

Thanks to John Gordon for taking the time to answer my questions. I expect to post more information on the Texas House District 52 race early next week.

Previous posts on the Texas House District 52 Race can be found here and here.

Candidate Larry Gonzales Answers Questions About the Texas House District 52 Race

March 30th, 2010

Here’s another installment in my series on the Republican Texas House District 52 race in advance of the primary runoff on April 13. This time I sent questions to candidate Larry Gonzales about his runoff with John Gordon. My questions are in italics below, followed by his answers.

1. Do you think you’re a more conservative candidate than John Gordon, and if so how?

Yes, absolutely. Please see my answers to question #2 below.

I also think a good phrase to use in addition to “more conservative” is “more experienced.” I have been working at the capitol and understand state policy as a real-world practical application – actually legislating the issues. It’s not theoretical or a campaign sound bite. John to this day has yet to address a state issue on his campaign website or direct mail program. He offers no solutions to the pressing matters facing Texas. There is a void of ideas. He does not offer leadership. I do. Every mail piece we produced has a theme, and each theme has bullet points of policy ideas. You can see my mail and read my ideas at www.larrygonzales.com/media.

2. On which three issues you think do you think the policies differences between yourself and Gordon are most clear? How?

(#1) TAXES. I want to look at a consumption tax as a way to eliminate the unfair and subjective property tax system in Texas.

John Gordon in his survey from the Empower Texans PAC said he opposes a consumption tax. Here is what he said regarding a consumption tax: “Do you want the Saudis and Chinese coming into Texas and buying up our property and land with no taxes ever applied to their possession of such? This “popular” idea requires some serious rethinking.”

I’m not an expert on the buying patterns of the Saudi’s and Chinese, but I can tell you that the taxpayers of Texas want a more fair and transparent system of taxation. A consumption tax does this. It’s the idea that you are taxed on the value of your expenditures. Buy a Chevy pass less taxes. Buy a Ferrari, pay more taxes. It’s transparent and fair.

(#2) TORT REFORM. I am a proponent of lawsuit reform and support the work done at the capitol for the past several sessions. These efforts have led to reduce costs of goods and services to taxpayers, consumers, and businesses. That’s why Texans for Lawsuit Reform has endorsed my campaign.

John Gordon is the poster child for lawsuit abuse, filing frivolous lawsuits and mucking up our judicial system, making it a mockery, and costing the taxpayers untold thousands of dollars. There are bad, lawsuit happy Republicans, too, and John Gordon is one of them.

As a matter of fact, when John Gordon INTENTIONALLY submitted his required by law campaign finance report late (more on this in a moment), he told the Williamson County Sun if his case was turned over to the Attorney General’s office for collection, he would “fight it in court,” stating, “I’ll subpoena them.”

Or, he could pay his fines and save the taxpayers of Texas money prosecuting an intentional, self-inflicted, ethics violation.

I am not certain of a third. These are the two biggest differences between us – I support a fairer consumption tax and tort reform. John does not support a consumption tax and is a lawsuit abuser.

3. Who are some of the thinkers and books that have influenced your political philosophy?

It’s not necessarily books of academia that have influenced my political philosophy. It’s the real people, real leaders, in real situations who I have followed, believed in, and have shaped my political philosophy around.

I have enjoyed the passion and enthusiasm of Alan Keyes.

I admired the leadership and confidence of Ronald Reagan.

I admire the hard work and attention to fiscal tax policy of Grover Nordquist.

I admire the dedication, selflessness, and humbleness of Bill Graham.

I admire the organization and strength in rallying for a cause Newt Gingrich gave us in 1994.

All of these political figures, and many more, for one reason or another, have shaped the way I think.

4. What tax and budget policies would you pursue going forward in the Texas legislature?

1. I favor a consumption tax over an unfair and subjective property tax.

2. Adopt a biennial spending limit of the sum of inflation-plus-population-growth.

3. Make certain any attempt to exceed this spending limit would take a 3/4th’s vote of both the House and the Senate and require the Governor’s signature.

4. Adopt a constitutional amendment requiring the Rainy Day Fund only be used to balance the budget in times of revenue shortfalls.

5. Adopt a constitutional amendment which says once the cap on the Rainy Day Fund is reached, surplus dollars are to be used for tax relief.

6. Protect state sovereignty by fighting against our federal government’s unfunded mandates.

7. Eliminate the practice of raiding dedicated funds for other purposes.

5. How should Texas build and maintain its road infrastructure going forward? Do you approve of building new toll roads? If so, should they be built the state, or by private entities under some sort of toll-sharing agreement?

Texas needs to build the road infrastructure with tax dollars collected for that purpose! This is very important! This is government non-transparency at its most abusive. I believe if we put this money back to work for its stated purpose, the prospect of toll roads falls further out of sight.

If an area of Texas must talk about toll roads, then here are my ground rules:

  1. The need must be evident
  2. “Need” is defined as public safety or overall good of the taxpayers
  3. It must promote first and foremost increased mobility – not be driven by profit centers
  4. Texas should never toll existing roads
  5. Texas needs a willing land partner who is compensated properly for their land
  6. There will be no over-reaching land grabs
  7. All rights of the property owner shall be enforced, considered, and protected
  8. Secure the best deal possible if the tolls are being built by an outside entity (building costs, maintenance costs, maintenance schedules, revenue goals, revenue sharing, time limits of ownership, etc.) Be a good steward of the taxpayer’s money.

6. Do you believe that Proposition 2, Proposition 3 and Proposition 11* passed as part of the 2009 Constitutional Amendments provide adequate protections against post-Kelo eminent domain abuses? If not, what more should the legislature do to address this issue? (*The first time I sent this question out I inadvertently omitted Proposition 11 from this list, and added it back during a follow-up email.)

I was a very strong supporter of Propositions #2, #3, and #11 in the 2009 November Constitutional amendments.

I can tell you in all the years I have been working on appraisal reform, I do not believe I have ever heard a link to post-Kelso concerns. I guess I can see why one might make that jump to there; I’m simply saying that to my knowledge eminent domain issues have not been tied to a purposeful appraisal hike. I’ll be watching carefully to make certain that does not become a reality in Texas.

7. Do you consider yourself a member of the Tea Party movement, and/or do you seek their support?

I am a fiscal and social conservative, and a life-long member of the Republican Party, active in politics and policy since I can remember. I understand the TEA Party movement and the frustration its members feel with an over-reaching, arrogant, federal government. It is much warranted, and I welcome them to the debates! The TEA Party has an important role in the process. I have sought the help and endorsement from TEA Party members I have met, and they have obliged, and are helping me spread the word of my campaign.

8. A recently mailing from Gordon has made much of your campaign receiving the majority of contributions from Houston-area developer Bob Perry. How do you respond to Gordon’s mailing, and do you think this is a significant issue?

It’s not an important issue and only demonstrates just how little and unaware John Gordon is of economic development and job creation in Williamson County.

While Mr. Perry lives in Houston, his business itself is HUGE employer of folks right here in Williamson County. Hundreds of jobs are provided in Williamson County – builders, contractors, subcontractors, roofers, electricians, drywall, cement, framers, and the REALTORS who sell these homes. As a matter of fact, Perry Homes is building five subdivisions in Williamson County right now. Perry Homes is a big part of our economy in HD52 supplying meaningful jobs. And as we know, jobs mean salaries, salaries mean people spend money, that money gets pumped into our local economy and we all benefit when more people are a part of our economic infrastructure. So, while Mr. Perry is not local, the hundreds of people who gain employment are, and they are very much a part of our Williamson County family. And I’ll be there for those families, helping spur economic development when elected.

This is all John Gordon has to talk about. He has no policy ideas and no real solutions to talk about. It’s the politics of diversion – plain and simple.

9. After Texas Railroad Commission chairman Victor Carrillo lost in the Republican primary to challenger David Porter, he said that his “Hispanic-surname was a serious setback from which I could never recover.” Do you think this is the reason he lost, and have you personally received any indication that your name will make it more difficult to win the Republican nomination?

No, and no.

10. Any other thoughts on the race or politics in general you’d care to share with readers?

You can tell a lot about a man’s character by his actions. We have run a campaign based on the important issues facing Texas, offering the voters a clear understanding of my positions of the issues.

The negative race John Gordon is running – lying to the voters, misleading the voters, and scaring the voters with ideas about me that are untrue, even exploiting my grandfather’s death for his personal and political gain – is sickening. I hope the voters see through this and reject his politics of fear.

Thanks to Larry Gonzales for taking the time to answer my questions. I should have John Gordon’s answers to a similar set of questions up in the next day or so.

Previous posts on the Texas House District 52 Race can be found here and here.

We Now Interupt Serious Political Blogging…

March 30th, 2010

…to bring you a man cooking bacon with his machine gun.

This is, of course, incredibly awesome.

Caveats:

  • Even at a discount price of $15/100 for ammo, it’s going to cost you around $30 to cook.
  • This test uses a 7.62mm machine gun, but for true scientific accuracy, I’d like to see how long it would take using a .50 caliber machine gun.

Hat tip: Instapundit.

A Reminder of Why I Dropped CNN As My Browser Home Page

March 26th, 2010

Some of you may remember that I used to have CNN as my browser homepage, but changed to Instapundit instead, mainly due to CNN’s liberal bias, the ever-shrinking amount of real news, and their fugly redesign.

So today, with a possible war brewing between North and South Korea, what do you think CNN’s top story is?

“Model, alleged drug queen on the lam”

Also, it’s an embedded Flash video, with no apparent transcript available, and seems to exist mostly to pimp the story on one of their shows tonight.

Thanks, CNN, for reminding me why I dropped you, and why Fox News is kicking your ass.

Former Candidate Stephen Casey on the Texas House District 52 Race

March 25th, 2010

There’s a primary runoff for various races to be held on April 13. Since primary runoffs are notoriously low-turnout affairs (especially this year, with the high-profile Governor’s primary over), I thought I would do some coverage of the three Republican runoffs I’ll be voting in:

  • The Supreme Court of Texas Place 3 runoff between Rick Green and Debra Lehrmann
  • The State Board of Education District 10 runoff between Marsha Farney and Brian Russell
  • The Texas House District 52 runoff between Larry Gonzales and John Gordon

I want to address the last of these first. The results from the Texas House District 52 primary were:

John Gordon 4,454 (40.84%)
Larry Gonzales 4,091 (37.51%)
Stephen Casey 1,535 (14.07%)
Alyssa Eacono 825 (7.56%)

To start off, I’d like to do something a little different, and interview one of the losing candidates for the position, Stephen Casey. Casey earned my vote by being a staunch conservative, having some interesting ideas as to how to reform the tax system, and posted supporting quotations from The Federalist Papers on his issues page, something that warmed the cockles of my policy-wonkish heart. After coming in third, Casey endorsed Gonzales in the runoff.

I wanted to get Casey’s views on the race, as well as the election process in general, before moving on to Gonzales and Gordon. (I also wanted to get Alyssa Eacono’s views, but she’s already taken down her campaign website.) I sent Casey some questions via email, and he was kind enough to provide answers to them. My original questions are in italics below.

1. What prompted you to get into the race in the first place?

I was called to run; it is an internal prompting that, in light of the current political landscape, sought to restore the idea of “public servant” to this office. Too often people are elected and fill the office without making a significant difference to the district or state. I ran to change that.

2. Do you think the race received enough attention from local media outlets for voters to make an informed choice?

To a certain extent. The only drawback I see is that I ran an issues-based campaign and believe that local media does not offer enough time to discuss the issues in depth; rather it is short sound-byte type attention that “makes news” which gets printed.

3. Obviously Gonzales and Gordon had a significant fund-raising advantage over both you and Eacono. How did you go about raising money, and was the lack of it a significant hindrance to your campaign?

I believe I received what I needed to do what I was called to do. With any race, funding is important. I’m pleased to have come in third with the funding that I had. To receive 14% of the vote means that I had a strong vote/dollar ratio. This means the message has great value.

4. One of you major campaign proposals was to abolish a personal property tax and replace it with a consumption tax. How well was this proposal received, and do you think the voters and/or legislature is willing to consider such a huge tax system overhaul?

This proposal was received well and it is gaining momentum. It is hard to both campaign on an issue and “inform” voters on it at the same time. This was made a bit easier because it became an issue at the gubernatorial level and for good reason–it could help solve this upcoming budget shortfall if we truly grasped the boon to our economic cycle that would happen if we eliminated the property tax. We would be able to overcome, with fewer cuts, the upcoming projected
shortfall.

5. What was the main reason you endorsed Gonzales over Gordon?

I found Larry to have a personal approach, as well as a positive character and reputation community-wide that was friendly and personable even over
disagreeable issues. In addition, he has served people in a variety of capacities and done so with integrity.

6. If you had it to do over again, what would you do differently with your campaign?

Campaign infrastructure is important, and I learned a great deal. I still would lead with what I consider the most important question, “How Can I Serve You?”, but would ask more voters to volunteer time as well as contribute.

7. Any other thoughts you’d like to share with readers on the race, or politics in general?

First, thanks to everyone who was involved in any manner in these races, and a more specific thank you to those who supported me through prayer and action. Please turn out to support Larry Gonzales for this runoff.

We need to think deeply and act with conviction regarding representative government. This means understanding our state’s founders and our nation’s founders as well as what they read and believed. Be involved and take seriously the privilege of self-government as it will only last as long as our involvement.

Thanks to Stephen Casey for responding. I hope to interview both Gonzales and Gordon in future posts.

The Battle Was Lost, The War Goes On

March 24th, 2010

So Stupak and his bloc caved, and ObamaCare is now the law of the land, at least until the lawsuits. (I like to think there’s a good chance the individual mandate will be overturned on 10th Amendment grounds. Then again, that supposes there’s a federal court that actually knows what the 10th Amendment says…)

Lessons? When push comes to shove, every Democrat is a liberal Democrat, and pro-lifers should know that every time they pull a level with a D next to the name, they’re voting for Nancy Pelosi, no matter what promises that candidate is willing to give on the campaign trail.

The only way to remedy this is for Republicans to campaign vigorously on repealing it, and defeat enough House Democrats in November.

More about this subject anon, but I hope to take a break from the ObamaCare coverage for a while. Look for some coverage of the Texas House District 52 race Real Soon Now.

Late ObamaCare Update: Heath Shuler A No, And So Is Harry Teague

March 20th, 2010

Rep. Heath Shuler (NC 11) finally makes a quarterback sneak into the “No on Obamacare” Endzone.

Rep. Harry Teague (NM 02) is also voting no. Investor’s Business Daily says this leaves Pelosi with zero margin; she has to run the table on every remaining undecided, or else break up the Stupak group, to pass the bill.

Of course, this is Washington. Someone may be counting out stacks of unmarked bills to flip a No vote even as we speak. But baring that, the road ahead is still very tough for Pelosi.

The fat lady isn’t quite singing just yet. But she’s starting to warm up.

Rep. Jason Altmire to Vote No on ObamaCare

March 19th, 2010

Altmire announced he would vote against ObamaCare. He was mentioned as a “must flip” for Pelosi in a lot of publications.

Here’s the profile I did on him last week. Glad to know his constituents made him see the light.

Quick and Dirty ObamaCare Update Friday 3/19

March 19th, 2010

Rep. Peter DeFazio (OR 04) switching from Yes to No?

Everyone know the preliminary CBO score that has ObamaCare reducing the deficit is pure fiction:

The Democrats know — and admit internally — that their proposed health-care overhaul would increase the deficit by twelve figures ($100,000,000,000) in 2017–2019. But they are firmly committed to hiding this fact from the American people.

Jeffrey Anderson at NRO also sees the count as 203 Yes, 214 No.

Rep. John Boccieri decides to commit political suicide by backing Pelosi against his constituents.

Rep. John Garamendi (CA 10) isn’t just going to vote for ObamaCare, his aides are going to call the police on constituents who ask him to vote otherwise.

Is the Stupak bloc being bought off with Pelosi promises?

Rep. Bobby Rush Switches from Yes to No to Maybe?

March 18th, 2010

So it appears.

Keep in mind that Bobby Rush is currently the only American politician to electorally kick Barack Obama’s ass. Some long-awaited payback for Obama challenging him, perhaps?

Still, I think when push comes to shove, I would be surprised to see Rep. Rush as a No on the final vote.