Remember the “Death Star” preemption bill designed to prevent left wing local governments from doing amazingly stupid things? Now it’s one step closer to Governor Abbott’s desk.
A landmark local government preemption bill cleared its second hurdle Tuesday as House Bill (HB) 2127 was passed by the Texas Senate, with a few amendments.
Dubbed the “Texas Regulatory Consistency Act,” the bill prohibits municipalities from approving regulations that exceed state law in nine different sections of code: Agriculture, Business & Commerce, Finance, Insurance, Labor, Local Government, Natural Resources, Occupations, and Property.
The bill states that any regulation specifically enumerated in state code is regulatable by municipalities, and anything else is not, a strategy called “field preemption.” Up until this session, the state had opted for “conflict preemption,” a strategy of addressing specific policies adopted by localities after the fact.
It’s the difference between blasting with a shotgun and firing with a rifle.
HB 2127 allows individuals or associations in the county of potentially offending regulation to sue the locality for abridging this prohibition.
The bill, authored by Rep. Dustin Burrows (R-Lubbock) and sponsored by Sen. Brandon Creighton (R-Conroe), was passed by the House about a month ago, where it received eight votes from Democrats in the lower chamber. From there, it moved to the Senate Business & Commerce Committee, where it passed six to two.
On Monday, the Senate passed its version with three amendments; Sen. Robert Nichols (R-Jacksonville) was the only GOP “nay” on the bill. The vote was the same on Tuesday’s final passage.
Those amendments include a “loser pays” provision, placing the burden of payment for a frivolous lawsuit with the person or group who brought the suit; a limitation that a suit may only be brought against the offending political subdivision, not individual elected officials of that locality who were liable to be sued under the House version; and the tacking on of a prohibition against local governments halting evictions.
Plaintiffs must provide three months’ notice to the locality of an impending suit, intended as a grace period within which the potential violation can be revoked.
That eviction language comes from Senate Bill (SB) 986, which appears to have stalled out in the lower chamber. That bill is aimed at what big cities in Texas tried to do — but were stopped by courts — in ordering eviction moratoriums during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Creighton said in a statement after the bill’s passage, “The Texas Regulatory Consistency Act, the most pro-business, pro-growth bill of the 88th session has passed the Senate.”
“HB 2127 gives Texas job creators the certainty they need to invest and expand by providing statewide consistency and ending the days of activist local officials creating a patchwork of regulation outside their jurisdiction. Local governments acting as lawmakers in a patchwork of varying anti-business ordinances result in job killing outcomes.”
Gov. Greg Abbott has backed the bill, shedding little doubt over whether he will sign it into law once it reaches his desk.
Snip.
With the bill passed in the upper chamber, it now moves back to the House, where the members must either accept the Senate version with its amendments or reject them and trigger a conference committee.
From there, it moves into the friendly embrace of Abbott, who’s been chomping at the bit to sign it into law.
The sooner this is signed into law, the sooner the madness consuming the local governments in Travis and Harris County can be reigned in.
Tags: 88th Texas Legislative Session, Austin, Brandon Creighton, Democrats, Dustin Burrows, Greg Abbott, Republicans, Robert Nichols, Texas
Alas. I gather the Health and Safety Code isn’t among those affected. From that I fear cities can continue to ban cigar lounges except Iin cigar stores.
Hmm. Centralize more power in the state. WCGW?
So what happens when democrats take over state government? Careful what you ask for.
“centralizing power?”
I guess, in a similar way to how the Bill of Rights “centralizes power” by preventing state and local governments from infringing as they will on the fundamental rights of the American people happening to live in those political subdivisions, instead requiring the civic body as a whole to agree to amend it.
This bill just requires Texas localities wishing to create deeper infringements on the rights and privileges on the subset of state citizens who live in their locales to actually get state law changed by convincing the majority of the state’s citizenry to do so. They appear to remain free to regulate more lightly than the state in the places in law where that is possible.
It would be much more effective to make government actors personally responsible for their awful behavior. Abbott locked down our churches just before Easter and put millions out of work and Austin wants to have a shotgun rather than a rifle?
@Alphonse Credenza
Bingo. Keep the heat on local leaders. Make sure people remember who screwed them over.
Not just the mega-cities, either. I remember photos of rural police with MRAPs to keep people from going to churches and bars.
That should never be forgiven, nor forgotten.
As a Canadian, I’m trying to wrap my mind around the concept that local governments can give themselves jurisdiction in any area. Up here, it’s inconceivable. Here, local governments are the creation of provincial governments and all their powers are delegated from the provinces. I thought that was also true in the U.S., so Texas shouldn’t have to pass a law forbidding actions that aren’t legitimate to begin with.