A Gun For Dinosaur Vs. T-Rex

If you’re well-read in science fiction, there’s a good chance you’ve read L. Sprague de Camp’s “A Gun for Dinosaur.” Now Scott from Kentucky Ballistics tests just how big a gun you need to take out a ballistic gel replica of a T-Rex skull.

Guns used:

  • .45 ACP (dual barrel)
  • 10 mm
  • .44 Magnum
  • .50 Magnum
  • 12 gauge shotgun
  • .45-70
  • .223
  • .460 Rigby
  • .577 Tyrannosaur (naturally)
  • .700 BMG
  • 4 bore (1″)
  • .950 JDJ
  • There are evidently only 20 .577 Tyrannosaur rifles, and only four .950 JDJs, in the world. One of the latter sold for just under $1 million last year, so if resurrected cloned dinosaurs do make a comeback, hunting them will probably be a very expensive hobby…

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    4 Responses to “A Gun For Dinosaur Vs. T-Rex”

    1. David Miller says:

      When I asked my the question, she said “All of them.” Good answer.

    2. Phil Kraemer says:

      Not under One Million dollars – actually it hammered for a bit less than $100,000.

      pjk

      [Math is hard. -LP]

    3. Firehand says:

      Personally, I came to hate that book with its ‘a rifle powerful enough to knock a dinosaur down’ crap.

      I think David Drake had it right in ‘Time Safari’: you’d need a rifle powerful enough, and with the right bullet, to penetrate muscle and bone deep enough to hit vitals from any angle. No ‘knock the beast down’ nonsense.

    4. Seawriter says:

      If resurrected cloned dinosaurs do make a comeback hunting them may be an expensive hobby, but it won’t be a $1,000,000 (or even $100,000) per gun hobby. ‘Murica being ‘Murica gun manufacturers would begin producing T Rex capable rifles to fill the now non-existent demand for such firearms. Through the miracle of free-market competition prices would be driven down to the absolute minimum consistent with a reasonable profit after capitalizing development costs.

    Leave a Reply