One of those Texas stories that keep bubbling along, and which I have trouble mapping out the dimensions of, is the high voltage line to the Permian Basin story. Texas Scorecard has been out front reporting on the controversy, and my reaction to the headlines has generally been a muted “that’s odd” before clicking on to something else. To summarize, certain state entities want to build extremely high voltage lines from other parts of the state to the oil and gas rich Permian Basin. Transmission line politics being fairly far from my areas of interest and expertise, I haven’t been covering the story beyond the occasional LinkSwarm piece.
When last we checked, an administrative law judges panel went “yeah, you don’t want to do that.” “The judges concluded the utilities [Oncor and the Lower Colorado River Authority Transmission Services Corporation] did not establish that the projects are necessary and failed to comply with notice requirements designed to give affected landowners a chance to participate before the application was filed.”
And here’s were the story flips from “odd” to “sinister.” The Texas Public Utility Commissioners looked at the that decision, and promptly went “Fuck you, we’re doing it anyway.”
Texas’ Public Utility Commissioners voted to move forward on the first of three controversial extra-high-voltage transmission lines. They did this despite calls from landowners and lawmakers to pause the project until after the 2027 legislative session.
The day before, Commission Chairman Thomas Gleeson filed a memo on a segment of the first line. He disagreed with administrative law judges’ finding that electricity delivery company Oncor “failed to notify more than 1,600 impacted landowners of a public meeting.” These are meetings where a transmission service provider presents information about the proposed project and collects feedback from impacted landowners.
“Understanding that folks are not happy with the process,” he said, “I think, on the law, the ALJ was wrong here.”
This is in regards to Oncor’s proposed Dinosaur to Drill Hole 765-kilovolt transmission line. This line would span approximately 390 miles from near Glen Rose to near the Culberson–Reeves county line.
How many 765-kilovolt transmission lines currently exist in Texas? Zero.
It is composed of two segments—the Dinosaur to Longshore and Longshore to Drill Hole lines. Gleeson’s memo addressed the administrative law judges’ Proposal for Decision in the Dinosaur to Longshore line.
Dinosaur to Drill Hole is part of the 765-kV Strategic Transmission Expansion Plan (STEP) Permian, a key part of the Permian Basin Reliability Plan (PBRP). STEP Permian proposes three transmission lines spanning more than 1,200 miles to move electricity from East Texas to the natural gas-rich Permian Basin. A pro-landowner group likened the project “to hauling water to the sea.”
Landowner complaints of not being “meaningfully included” in the process have helped elevate this project to the attention of state officials. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and members of the state House and Senate called for PUCT to deny all pending 765-kV projects until the legislature can reform the approval process in 2027.
American Stewards of Liberty (ASL) and a more than 30-member coalition that includes the Texas Public Policy Foundation requested that PUCT abate all five segments.
To quote TPPF on the project:
In April 2025, the PUC adopted the 765-kV STEP Plan to address projected load growth in the Permian Basin through 2038, approving approximately $5 billion in local
transmission upgrades designed to meet oil and gas demand. Three new 765-kV transmission lines from Central Texas to the Permian Basin region were also approved, with an
estimated cost of $9 billion. The local upgrades will meet more immediate needs due to rising oil and gas demand and existing transmission constraints. The extra capacity from the 765-kV lines will primarily serve projected data center load growth in West Texas and transport excess wind and solar generation from the region to other parts of the ERCOT grid.
And there it is, the real reason for the proposed line: To let Oncor and other big energy utilities sell the power generated by their expensive investments in solar and wind energy to data centers over cheap, reliable new natural gas plants in the same region the data centers are going to be located in.
If Oncor wants to do that, let them pay for their own damn power lines.
Also opposing the lines: Ken Paxton.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, this year’s Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, called on state authorities to pause further action on the plan.
“The Legislature must be afforded the time to review the Plan and its potential impacts so it can then enact additional legislation to provide whatever additional guidance it deems fit,” Paxton wrote.
Snip.
Paxton filed an amicus curiae brief with the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) “in support of abating any decision in furtherance of the Permian Basin Reliability Plan.”
“The Commission has created a Plan that appears to exceed the original intent of H.B. 5066 such that the Commission is no longer aligned with the expectations of the Legislature,” the brief reads.
“As the Legislature is already endeavoring to tackle the growth in electric demand spurred by data centers popping up across the state, now is the ideal time for the Legislature to review the Plan as part of a holistic review of the state’s reliability efforts.”
More:
Republican Texas Railroad Commissioner Wayne Christian and conservative organizations such as the Texas Public Policy Foundation have claimed that the region’s ample natural gas could supply electricity locally, obviating the need for power lines that span the state. Some local officials argue that the plan diminishes city and county authority. Landowners have testified that the lines would affect wildlife and agriculture.
The unseemly haste with which the PUC tossed aside the judicial recommendations suggests that the fix is in, and that little things like widespread opposition won’t be allowed to derail Big Energy and Big Data’s agenda of getting taxpayers to further subsidize their investments.
If PUC continues trying to shove this down taxpayer’s throats despite all the opposition, they should expect some serious lawsuits.
And here’s the King Crimson jam/improve track that gave rise to the title for this post.
Tags: American Stewards of Liberty (ASL), Dan Patrick, Energy Policy, ERCOT, Ken Paxton, LCRA, natural gas, oil industry, Oncor, Permian Basin, Public Utility Commission (PUC), Robert Montoya, solar power, subsidies, Texas, Texas Public Policy Foundation, Texas Scorecard, Thomas Gleeson, video, Wayne Christian, wind power