President Trump announced early Saturday morning that U.S. forces captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife during a “large scale strike against Venezuela,” a dramatic conclusion to Trump’s months-long pressure campaign to oust the socialist dictator.
Shortly after Trump’s announcement, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that Maduro and his wife had been indicted in the Southern District of New York on drug trafficking and firearm charges.
“They will soon face the full wrath of American justice on American soil in American courts,” Bondi said of Maduro and his wife.
Venezuelan officials did not immediately release casualty numbers but said that the operation did result in Venezuelan deaths.
Trump administration officials have long argued that Maduro, who seized power in 2013, is an illegitimate ruler and is responsible for trafficking vast quantities of cocaine into the U.S. He was indicted in 2020 in the U.S. on charges that he was the active leader of a drug cartel known as Cartel de los Soles.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s only public comment on the operation consists of a reposted social message, originally published in July of last year, stating that “Maduro is NOT the President of Venezuela and his regime is NOT the legitimate government.”
The Pentagon has been amassing warships, troops, and air assets in the Caribbean since August and has attacked many small vessels which Pentagon officials insist were carrying drugs, killing at least 115 people. The U.S. has also seized two Venezuelan oil tankers in recent weeks, disrupting the Maduro regime’s main source of revenue.
Though reports seem light on military details, Suchomimus has video footage of airstrikes hitting military targets in Caracas, noting the presence of Chinook helicopters over the city:
He suggests that the airstrikes were mainly to take out anti-aircraft emplacements to clear the way for the Chinooks.
Lifting the dead corpse of socialism off the backs of the Venezuelan people is a huge accomplishment, as is removing another ally from the Russia-China Axis of Assholes. It also shows that the Monroe Doctrine is alive and well.
Now: How long until district court judge James Boasberg declare that Trump must restore Maduro to power?
Also: Cuba and Iran should consider themselves on notice…
When last we checked on this story, Texas Republican Congressman Dan Crenshaw was threatening to sue YouTuber Shawn Ryan over comments Ryan had made about Crenshaw, and Crenshaw had agreed to come on Ryan’s show to address the issues.
Guess what? Rep. Crenshaw appears to be pussing out by refusing to sign Ryan’s standard release form.
“I need to talk to you about the Dan Crenshaw situation. As many of you know, he sent me a cease and desist, threatened to sue me. I made a rebuttal. I invited him on the show. Then he challenged me. I accepted. I said, ‘Okay, perfect. January 2nd to come on this show, you have to sign a release form.'”
“Everybody that’s been on this show since around episode 10 has signed a release form. President Trump, J.D. Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, Joe Kent, lots of very important people, much more important than a congressman have signed that release form. Everybody that has been interviewed in the new studio has signed the exact same release form.”
“Dan and his attorneys, they don’t want to sign the release form. They want special concessions. We sent them that release form on December 26th. They then sent a bunch of red lines. We said we’re not making any special circumstances or modifying our release form for the congressman. I’m sorry, that’s not going to happen.”
“But we will make some special concessions for his protection on another document and send that over.” You know, I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest that Rep. Crenshaw doesn’t need more protections than Donald Trump.
“Well, they have yet to sign either one of those documents. I have to have those documents signed to interview somebody. Everybody’s done it.”
“I talked to my attorney. I said, ‘I think this is what’s going to happen. They are going to wait until close of business on New Year’s Eve to send some type of a communication in hopes that we don’t get it because who the hell is checking their email at 10:00 at night on New Year’s Eve?’ Well, guess what?”
“We get an email at 10 o’clock at night from Dan’s campaign manager on New Year’s Eve, where the next day is a national holiday and nobody’s behind their decks. And the next day it’s game day. It’s interview time.”
“They said, ‘We’re booked. We’ve booked the hotel that you’ve recommended. Will somebody be there to pick us up?’ There was no mention of the release forms.”
“So, here’s what’s going to happen. They’re going to come here and they’re going to make a big stink on how I didn’t interview them and how I was scared to interview them or whatever, but they’re hiding behind the paperwork.”
“Dan, I am now redacting my invitation for you to come on my show. I gave you the opportunity to be a man. You didn’t take it.”
“I gave you the opportunity to speak to five and a half million people and prove to them that you are not insider trading. That’s a fucking gift. I might add, a gift that not very many people get, and you turned it down.”
“I’m not going to interview you now. I don’t play games.”
“This is what you do, Dan. You’re a bully. You bully people into submission. Anybody that scrutinizes you, you send them a nasty gram and you threaten to sue them. And that works. Unfortunately, it didn’t work on me.”
Assuming all this is true (and right now I have no reason not to believe it’s true), Rep. Crenshaw comes off looking even worse than he did before threatening to sue Ryan.
If Crenshaw doesn’t have anything to hide about his finances, he’s sure acting like someone who has something to hide…
For some reason, Vladimir Putin seems to think he can force NATO to back down from supporting Ukraine against his illegal war of territorial aggression by launching various provocations. Here’s a roundup of recent NATO country responses to Russia.
First up: Cappy Army on NATO beefing up it’s defensive line against Russia:
“NATO is racing to build a multi-billion dollar 2,000 mile long defensive line that stretches across the entire European continent.”
“There are several names for the new fortification depending on the section you’re standing at. In the Baltics, it’s officially known as the Eastern Flank Deterrence Line, which is a 500 mile long network of bunkers and fortified border zones.”
“The Eastern Flank Deterrence Line is not mainly physical barriers, because the distance is far too great. Instead, it’s a network of computer sensors to fill these physical gaps. It’s not designed to completely defeat a potential Russian conventional advance. It’s made to slow down and channel the enemy’s forces into these predetermined kill zones.”
“The Army and NATO’s focusing their efforts at the places deemed most vulnerable in the Baltics. Here they’re deploying a layered modular barrier system that runs 30 miles deep.” First they hit sensors lines, then get a dose of HIMARS and artillery, then drone swarms in the air and on the ground. “Estimates are these methods will have to kill or wound 70% of the attacking force to be successful.”
The length of the entire defensive line is roughly the length of the U.S.-Mexico border.
“It’s designed this way to cover large sections of land that may not already have trenches pre-plotted artillery and mortar kill zone are linked to a network of sensors and then anything that makes it past that runs into rows of landmines, then physical obstacles, including anti-vehicle ditches and rows of concrete dragons teeth. These are strategically placed at the high-speed avenues of approach that lead directly to the Baltic state capitals.”
“The second line of defensive positions in the network is over 600 bunkers of distributed firing positions, trenches, and roadblocks. Infantry and anti-tank javelin teams fight from here.”
“The European Deterrence Initiative in the United States requested $2.9 billion from America in 2025 to deter Russia. Poland’s portion of the defensive line will cost over $50 billion with much of that funding coming from the EU. And the Baltics and Finland are spending a combined billions of dollars more as well.”
“Similar to the Cold War doctrine, [Baltic forces are] a kind of tripwire force here. Troops stationed here jokingly refer to themselves as tactical speed bumps.” The idea is to buy time until reinforcements arrive.”
“In Estonia, there’s only 127 miles from the border with Russia to the capital city.”
“The defining issue along the defensive wall is manpower. The shortage of manpower is what has shaped all of the decisions for how this fortification is being built. The Estonian army has roughly 6,000 active soldiers with a NATO force of 2,000 UK and French troops also deployed here. And if we look across the whole Baltics, we see that there’s roughly 29,000 active duty soldiers total here. This does not fully take into account reserve forces or air power advantages, but it outlines the basic tactical problem.”
In Poland the defensive line continues under the name Eastern Shield. “This runs from the Kalinigrad enclave down along Belarus and towards Slovakia, which is another 500 miles.”
“Poland’s Eastern Shield has an entirely different strategy than the Baltics. They expect to absorb the first hit and then fight a long, protracted war on their own soil if they have to. The shield here does not have the benefit of being built around geographic obstacles like in the Baltics. This is why you see full-length anti-tank ditches and multi-mile long trench systems laid out in depth.”
“The scale of the project is gigantic, with 8,000 combat engineers working to lay 10,000 concrete dragon’s teeth and over 800 miles of layered anti- vehicle barriers backed up by massive amounts of artillery. Terrain denial is the focus on this stretch.”
“Manpower and mass is less of a problem on this section of the front, because in Poland there’s 280,000 well-trained and equipped active forces with an additional 10,000 American soldiers already stationed there before reinforcements arrive.”
“The defining piece of this part of the puzzle is the anti-air assets, with 48 Patriot air defense launchers provide a protective umbrella for forces massing here.”
“The logistics backbone is being built here. Poland would be the transit region into the Baltics and much of the large stockpile of fuel and ammo are positioned here because they have the space.”
NATO has a more difficult problem defending Poland than the Warsaw Pact did when Moscow called the shots. “Today’s NATO and EU is an alliance of sovereign states that must coordinate instead of obey. This makes rapid unified action more difficult.”
“The US Army themselves acknowledge Russia has the advantage in manpower and equipment on this front, and that Russia can choose the time and place of the attack.” I sincerely doubt Russia has the equipment or manpower advantage now that Vlad’s Big Adventure has run through Soviet-era tank stockpiles and slaughtered Russian manpower to gain tiny slivers of Ukrainian territory.
A history of static defenses snipped and Cold War defensive realities snipped.
NATO General Chris Donahue: “The massive momentum problem that Russia poses to us, we’ve developed the capability to make sure that we can stop that mass and momentum problem.”
In their panic over Ukraine slowly destroy both their Black Sea fleet and their shadow fleet, Russia has managed to piss Turkey off:
“After Russian forces increased their activity and provocations over [the Black Sea] and NATO country’s airspace, Turkey was the first to act and shot down Russian surveillance drones without warning.”
“As more accidents followed, the Russians are now at risk of facing the Turkish wrath, getting all their trade cut off outright without any strikes needed.”
A Russian drone with transponder equipment was found on the ground in a Romanian forest. “With a wingspan of roughly 2 meters, Romanian authorities assessed that the device had been used to monitor NATO facilities or track military aid deliveries to Ukraine.”
“Three separate Russian drones violated Turkish airspace, pushing the country closer to decisive action. The first incident occurred when a Russian drone entered Turkish airspace from the Black Sea. Turkish air defense reacted swiftly and F-16 fighter jets intercepted the target, ultimately shooting it down with an M9X sidewinder missile.”
“The second incident was even more alarming when a Russian Orlan reconnaissance drone crashed near the city of Izmit just 50 kilometers from Istanbul.”
“The third case involved debris from a Russian Merlin reconnaissance drone discovered in western Turkey. The Merlin can remain airborne for up to 10 hours flying at altitudes of up to 5 kilometers and carrying advanced opto-electronic sensors. Its presence again pointed to sustained intelligence gathering activity rather than an isolated malfunction.”
“If Ankara were to sight repeated Russian drone incursions as a security threat, it could even restrict civilian Russian shipping through the Bosphorus in retaliation. The consequences would be severe as such a move would devastate Russia’s Black Sea trade and challenged the 1936 Montreux Convention, guaranteeing free passage for merchant vessels.”
“Russian drone operations continue, Ankara appears willing not only to shut down the sky over the Black Sea, but also to potentially escalate further and close the boss for us, making it clear that spying on NATO members in the region will carry real and costly consequences.”
“Russia’s shadow fleet is coming under mounting pressure in the Baltic, as interceptions increase and European states move more aggressively against sanctioned vessels. However, now Russia is responding by placing Wagner mercenaries on board these ships, bringing one of its most violent forces directly into Nato-monitored waters.”
“The European Union has just released a new sanctions package targeting forty-one additional shadow fleet vessels, bringing the total to more than six hundred ships now barred from European-linked ports, insurance, and services. These ships are losing access to harbors, maintenance, and technical certification, which forces Moscow to rely on improvised routes that squeeze through increasingly narrow corridors.”
“Beyond oil, these vessels also move sensitive cargo linked to Russia’s war effort, which makes each interception far more consequential than a financial loss alone, and as enforcement tightens, the risk shifts from paperwork violations to direct seizure.”
This shift became visible when Swedish authorities detained the Russian cargo vessel Adler after it entered Swedish waters with unresolved documentation issues. The ship’s owner is sanctioned for transporting materials linked to Russia’s weapons production, and when Adler suffered engine trouble in Swedish waters, the crew could not produce clean documentation. Swedish authorities boarded immediately, as the detention came amid growing reports that Russia has begun placing Wagner mercenaries on board shadow fleet vessels, raising the stakes for any inspection or boarding operation, and signaling that European states are no longer intimidated by the possibility of armed Russians on these vessels.”
“According to Danish maritime pilots, once Wagner personnel are on board, they often restrict access to the bridge and interfere with communication between captains and port authorities, and push for routing that avoids areas where inspections are common.”
“For Moscow, Wagner functions as a last-line enforcement tool. Their role is to ensure that vessels keep moving even when legal and operational risks become unacceptable by normal commercial standards. Crews bullied, beaten, or threatened by the mercenaries may even quietly signal nearby NATO ships for help, or attempt to sabotage equipment to force an emergency stop in Western waters, with the Adler’s crew possibly sabotaging the engine before they reached a Russian port, and Wagners would come on board. On top of that, owners of leased ships may object to hosting armed Russian soldiers, whose presence massively increases legal liability and operational danger.”
The case of Adler matters because it highlights how the shadow fleet is being used not only for oil, but for moving weapons and military-linked cargo. Western officials assess that a substantial portion of Russia’s imported ammunition components, explosives precursors, and sanctioned industrial equipment now arrives by sea, precisely because land routes and air transport are more exposed to interception. If vessels like Adler are increasingly detained or disrupted, Russia does not just lose revenue but risks bottlenecks in the supply chains that feed its weapons production.”
NATO hasn’t been backing down in the face of repeated Russian provocations. Putin is playing an increasingly weak hand badly.
Something from the “old news is so exciting” file, but this BBC piece from 2010 in which then Top Gear presenter Richard Hammond interviews racing driver Stirling Moss about his crash on the track in 1962, and subsequent recovery from his serious brain injury, and how his crash and recovery compares to Hammond’s own in a jet-powered car, is quite fascinating.
A few interesting takeaways:
Moss was in a coma for a month, and one side of his body was paralyzed for some six months.
When he recovered, he tried racing on a track again, but decided to retire because all the split-second decisions he had previously made instantaneously he had to consciously think about.
Hammond’s own crash in 2006 was at 288mph, and even though he pulled the parachute release, it failed to deploy. He was in a medically-induced coma for two weeks.
Hammond did an interview in December just three months after the accident, and appeared on Top Gear in January some four months after, both times proclaiming himself completely recovered, but later Hammond looked back on those segments and said he clearly wasn’t fully recovered. Indeed, he said each year he would look back at the last, and realize that full recovery was a continuing process.
Both men said they reacted to what they thought were their impending deaths not with fear, but just wondering what would come next.
Bonus the First: Road To Success interviews Top Gear producer Jim Wiseman, who also produced the Hammond-Moss interview:
Bonus the Second: Road To Success interviews Top Gear writer Richard Porter:
70% of what Top Gear would become was already sketched out on pieces of paper Jeremy Clarkson brought to the initial meeting with Wilman (an old mate from school) to relaunch Top Gear.
They hated the show’s initial Sunday night BBC2 time-slot (which, weirdly, they had to scare off another car show from using), but it turned out to be a blessing in disguise.
Because nobody in BBC management was interested in cars, they were allowed essentially free reign to run the show how they wanted, and to experiment to see what worked and what didn’t.
They ended up doing things just because they were interested in them, not because they thought anyone else would be, but this eclectic approach ended up unlocking different audience segments that fueled their global growth.
They note that the trial-and-error approach was a huge key to their success, and that if they had aimed for global success from the first, they never would have achieved it.
One key was that voiceovers should undercut or counterpoint what was going on on-screen, such as “which went well” rather than “James has broken down again.”
They realized early on that failure was a lot more interesting than success. There was a road trip with cheap cars where all three had broken down, and their old school director asked if they should just stop shooting, but Clarkson went “No, keep shooting. This is what it’s about now.”
Clarkson’s background was in British tabloid journalism, so he likes to craft his segments ahead of time. By contrast, Hammond is a master of on-the-spot riffing and improvisation.
Amazon only did Clarkson’s Farm (and Hammond’s Workshop) as a way to lure them back into doing two more seasons of The Grand Tour. When they heard Clarkson wanted to make the show about farming, they were terrified it was going to be boring. Clarkson said “I don’t blame them.” But it turned out brilliantly because all of the figures in the show were such natural characters that they worked better than any casting call could.
I haven’t been able to verify this yet, but according to China Observer, “Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry may have escalated export controls on November 20-21, adding 12 types of core semiconductor materials and related services to its “End User List,” placing about 110 semiconductor-related entities from mainland China under heightened scrutiny. Mainland China is more than 60% reliant on imports for photoresist, with ArF/EUV almost entirely dependent on Japan and the Netherlands.”
Every time you pattern a semiconductor wafer via a lithography stepper, you first have to deposit photoresist across the entire surface of the wafer. Once you’ve done that, the lithography pattern projected on the wafer hardens, letting some areas get stripped away during etch to create the interconnect patterns for other processes to fill with circuits for the chips. Getting proper photoresist uniformity across the entire wafer has some technical challenges, but it’s something like ten orders of magnitude less complex than EUV lithography. But getting the formula for EUV photoresist exactly right, and then manufacturing it ultrapure in quantity? Yeah, that’s not exactly something you can do in a high school chemistry lab.
“The Japanese have directly pulled out of the entire photoresist business in China. 90% of the photo resist we use is imported, with 60% coming from four Japanese companies. Without them, we can’t operate in the high-end sectors. With Japan’s withdrawal of supplies, domestic semiconductor factories are in chaos. Production capacity is declining and yield rates are crashing. Once production lines stop, they lose millions of yen a day.”
“The entire semiconductor industry is suffering massive losses.”
“A blogger in one video pointed out that few people know that in China’s semiconductor industry, the true bottleneck isn’t the photolithography machine, but a small bottle of liquid costing 50,000 RMB: photoresist.”
Section on China having a hissy fit over Japan’s prime minister Sanae Takaichi stating that Japan would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion (touched on in this LinkSwarm) skipped.
“Japan [quietly] and decisively retaliated. According to a report by Chinese media outlet East Money, Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry may have escalated export controls on November 20th to 21st, adding 12 types of core semiconductor materials and related services to its end user list, placing about 110 semiconductor related entities from mainland China under heightened scrutiny.”
“Among the most notable measures are those affecting photoresist and photolithography machine after-sales services regarding photoresist.”
“Four Japanese companies (JSR Corporation, Shin-Etsu Chemical Company, Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd. and Fujifilm) have suspended deliveries of ArF [Argon-Fluoride laser] immersion and EUV photoresist to mainland Chinese customers while high-end KrF [Krypton-Fluoride laser] products have been significantly delayed.”
“Mainland China is more than 60% reliant on imports for photo resist, with ArF UV almost entirely dependent on Japan and the Netherlands.”
“Canon and Nikon have informed their Chinese customers that, starting in November, the supply of certain DUV photography machine parts and on-site maintenance services will depend on export licensing conditions. Currently, China has over 1,200 DUV photography machines, 90% of which depend on Canon and Nikon for after sales service.”
” After Canon and Nikon further restrict services, China’s stock of spare parts for photography machines will only last about 3 to 6 months, with photoresist being one of the most critical components.” Well, consumable supply rather than component.
“Industry insiders say this means that many Japanese-made photography machines currently in operation will face a supply shortage in the short term and could become scrap metal in the long term.” This is an overstatement, as there’s usually a healthy demand for such machines on the secondary market, either to replace a old machine, or to cannibalize for parts, for research fabs, or for someone trying to put together a trailing-edge fab on the cheap.
“Unlike the open ban on 23 types of equipment in 2023, Japan is now adopting a gray customs clearance strategy where rather than announcing an outright embargo. It is using case-by-case approvals, indefinite delays in issuing licenses and cutting off parts and technical support, effectively a supply cut off.”
The U.S. has also applied pressure on Japan to implement restrictions.
“Photoresist is far more complex than it seems.”
“First, the shelf life of high-end photo resist is extremely short, often only 6 months or even less. This means it’s impossible to stockpile and if supply is cut off, production lines will immediately shut down.”
“Second, the extreme purity requirements. The formula for photoresist contains dozens of chemical substances with each proportion error not exceeding 1 millionth. The metal impurity limit is as low as 0.001 parts per million, like 1 microgram per kilogram. To put this into perspective, imagine eight Olympic swimming pools full of water. If even a single drop of impurity is mixed in, it must be identified and removed.”
“This isn’t just a challenge in terms of the formula. It’s a critical test for the entire chemical purification, filtration, transport, and storage process.”
“Third, the ecological [I think they mean ecosystem -LP] barrier. Why are Japanese companies so dominant in the photoresist market? Because over the past 30 years, they have developed their expertise alongside semiconductor giants like TSMC, Intel, and Samsung. Producing photoresist isn’t enough. It must be tested on photography machines worth billions of dollars. The verification cycle takes 2 to 5 years with a high failure rate. Without top semiconductor foundaries to conduct these trial and error processes, your photoresist will never make it out of the laboratory.”
“Japan’s dominance in the photoresist market dates back to the 1970s when the country’s economy surged. The government and businesses jointly invested heavily in the semiconductor industry, focusing partially on materials.”
“In addition to the high technical barriers and lengthy R&D cycles which take years and require immense investment, Japan holds an overwhelming patent monopoly, 70% of related patents globally. It’s virtually impossible to bypass this barrier.”
“Major global chemical companies like the US’s DuPont and Germany’s BASF have less than 10% of the photoresist market share. South Korea has tried but still depends on imports for high-end products. Japanese companies are not only technologically advanced, but their strong industrial chain cooperation in photography machines and silicon wafer production makes it nearly impossible for external competitors to enter.”
“According to a 2024 Nikki survey, Japan holds the number one market share in three out of five semiconductor material categories, with photoresist being one of them.”
China has tried to develop their photoresist, but when they try them out in fabs, their yield rate crashes. Even if China can steal the right formula, they can’t steal all the intermediary steps necessary to produce the formula.
“This issue involves a country’s mastery and accumulation of basic materials and processes, which cannot be solved simply by hiring people to steal technology.”
“Japan’s precision manufacturing processes are beyond the reach of China.”
For the sake of brevity, I’m skipping over an extensive list of other areas of semiconductor technology where China is heavily dependent on Japan.
A whole lot of people freaked out over China’s near-monopoly on rare earth minerals, but China is a lot more dependent on the west for a whole lot of things much higher on the technological food chain.
An interesting Second Amendment case may be making its way to the Supreme Court soon involving reciprocity and post-Bruen state resistance to Second Amendment rights.
“The case is Gardner v. Maryland. It is a challenge to Maryland’s concealed carry laws, as it dealt with out of state residents as it was pre-Bruen. It has an amazing fact pattern, one that a plaintiff’s attorney, a petitioning attorney, would love nothing more to have.
A lot of people missed it because it was a “pro se petition,” i.e. filed by the person involved rather than a lawyer.
“Now it’s sitting on petition to the United States Supreme Court.”
“Our good friend Kostas Moros over at the Second Amendment Foundation is geeking out on the video.”
“And he also comes to the conclusion, number one, Miss Gardner had gotten completely effed by Maryland law. And number two, you really could not ask for a better fact pattern.”
“So he convinces the Second Amendment Foundation to actually do an amicus brief in support of her petition, and also starts using his platforms to publicize this case which then leads to Miss Gardner no longer being a pro se petitioner. She now has counsel. In fact, she has very, very competent counsel representing her.”
“But that’s only the beginning of the cool news.”
“What once started as a pro se petition by a woman who absolutely got completely hosed by an unconstitutional licensing scheme now has amicus briefs in support of her petition from the following groups.”
“There’s an amicus brief from the Second Amendment Foundation, co-authored with the NRA, Second Amendment Law Center, California Rifle and Pistol Association, the Citizens Committee on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus.
“But that’s just the beginning of the good news, because guess who else has filed amicus briefs in support of Ava Marie Gardner’s petition? the Cato Institute, the Heller Foundation, 24 attorneys general, spearheaded by the states of Virginia and New Hampshire,” including Texas AG Ken Paxton.
“And an amicus brief from Senators Ted Cruz, and all of these other members of the United States Senate.”
“Ava Marie Gardner is a lawful and responsible gun owner residing in the state of Virginia. And yes, she has a valid Virginia concealed carry license.”
“She’s traveling through Montgomery County, Maryland, specifically on Interstate 270. A road rager intentionally strikes Miss Gardner’s car and forces her off the road. Now, after both cars come to a stop, the other driver gets out of his car and starts rushing towards Miss Gardner’s car.”
“She initially screams at him to stop, but that doesn’t seem to work. So, then she displays her firearm and stops the threat. And I want
you to understand that she merely displayed it, did not discharge it. There was no allegation of her pointing it at it. It was just the display of the firearm.”
But then, well, after police arrived, the only person arrested was Miss Gardner.”
“For unlawful display of a firearm? Nope. For assault? Nope. No. In fact, the only thing that Miss Gardner was arrested for fell under Maryland Code of Criminal Law Section 4-203A, which says that you cannot have a firearm on your person or in your vehicle unless you are properly licensed by the state of Maryland.”
This case goes back and the law that Maryland was using for their concealed carry license at the time made it actually impossible. So that even had Miss Gardner wanted to try to get a Maryland license, she in all likelihood would have never obtained one.”
“At the time, in order to get a Maryland concealed carry license,
one had to one show good and substantial reason. That’s right. they were still operating under the “may issue” standard. So you actually had to prove up a reason as they saw fit for you to actually be able to carry a firearm.”
“And then in addition to that too, you had to have 16 hours of instruction which of course was only available in Maryland.”:
“And then let us remember that also at the time the state of Maryland offered absolutely no reciprocity whatsoever. So she would have never been able to obtain a Maryland license because she was an out of state resident even if they offered some kind of semblance to an out of state resident.”
“So it was basically impossible for Miss Gardner to get a Maryland license.”
So Maryland arrested Gardner for not possessing a license that they never would have allowed her to obtain.
Hopefully the Supreme Court will take up the case and remind deep blue states that Second Amendment rights are not optional.
Back in 2023, Ukraine sunk the Russian Kilo-class submarine Rostov-on-Don. Now Ukraine has sunk another Kilo-class sub, this time in Novorossiysk using an underwater “Sub Sea Baby” drone.
Novorossiysk is beyond the Kerch Strait Bridge, indicating that Ukraine has quite long-range underwater strike capabilities.
It seems that none of Russia’s Black Sea fleet is safe from Ukraine’s reach…
For a long time, a lot of experts felt that rifle bullets with a velocity of 5,000 feet per second or more were simply unobtainable. The .220 Swift, which hit 4,200 fps on a 40 grain bullet, was thought to be the maximum “regular” cartridge. Even the the infamous .22 Eargesplitten Loudenboomer supposedly only hit 4,600.
But now Banana Ballistics has evidently done the impossible, using a necked-down 5.56 NATO cartridge paired with an insanely light 12.5 grain solid brass bullet he calls “the Mouse Turd” firing out of a KAK 17-5.56 upper, he’s hit 5,157 FPS.
But that’s not the top! With what he considers an unsafe load, he hit 5,326.
And all that out of a 21 inch barrel.
I would like to calculate the trajectory of the round, but the online ballistics computer I tried tops out at 5,000 fps.
You may think a bullet that small is useless for anything but varmint hunting, but actually managed to punch through a half inch of mild steel.
It also tumbles more than a foot through a block of ballistic gel. Being on the receiving end would really ruin your whole day.
I assume many in the gun community will see a bullet that light out of a barrel that small as nothing more than a novelty, but 5,000+ fps is nothing to sneeze at.
Podcaster/YouTuber Shawn Ryan is one of those people that lies at the edge of the Mil-blogger/YouTubers I already watch, but never enough to have a tag for him before now. I recognize him from a Joe Rogan interview thumbnail and the disasterous interview Gavin Newsom had with him, but I’m not really familiar with his work. But it definitely got my attention that Texas Congressman Dan Crenshaw is threatening to sue him, a clash that probably has an added intensity since both are ex-Navy SEALS.
“On December 9th, 2025, I received a legal demand letter from lawyers representing Congressman Dan Crenshaw. They are threatening to sue me for defamation because of comments I made on my podcast about a message that he sent me.”
“They want me to remove content, issue a public apology, and stop talking about him. I’m not going to do any of that.”
“What I originally said a while back, I commented on my show about Congressman Crenshaw throwing an extremely expensive party and the fact that he seems to have become quite wealthy during his time in Congress.”
“I raised questions about how a congressman making $174,000 a year can afford that kind of a lifestyle. These are legitimate questions. And to be honest, I didn’t even mention Dan Crenshaw’s name in that initial conversation.”
“I just brought up the fact that he was having Steve Aoki, a major DJ spin at his party.” I honestly have no idea how much “top DJs” make.
“Multiple news outlets have reported on concerns about congressional insider trading and members of Congress, including Congressman Crenshaw, actively trading stocks while having access to non-public information that affects those very stocks. I’m not the only person asking these questions, but apparently I’m the one that got under Dan’s skin.”
Crenshaw then sent Ryan an Instagram that Ryan perceived to be threatening:
Hey Sean, you have the ability to contact your fellow team guy if you’ve got a problem with me or have questions about how I’m getting rich. Some of my boys at six told me about your indirect swipe at me. From the comment you made, it sounds like you have some beliefs that are based on trendy narratives instead of facts.
Eh, I think Ryan may be over-reacting here. To me the not read more like “What the hell?” than “I’m going to break your kneecaps.”
Ryan then plays a clip of Crenshaw talking about how he’ll kill Tucker Carlson if he meets him. Definitely injudicious on Crenshaw’s part, but not an actionable threat.
“Now his lawyers are claiming that my interpretation of his message is defamation. They say I accused him of threatening me with assault, which is a crime, and that I need to publicly apologize and remove the content from my show.” And here’s where Crenshaw screwed up. The congressman seems unaware of The Streisand Effect. This video already has three million views, so millions of people who previously unaware of the accusations against him have now heard them.
“Here’s my response. No, I’m publishing their full demand letter, along with my lawyer’s response, so that you can read both and decide for yourself whether my interpretation was unreasonable.”
“This is about whether a sitting member of Congress can use the threat of an expensive litigation to silence criticism. I asked questions about Congressman Crenshaw’s wealth. Those questions are fair game. He is a public official. He makes decisions that affect all of us. He trades stocks while having access to classified and non-public information.”
“If Congressman Crenshaw wants to sue me, he can. My lawyers are ready. And if he does, we’re going to use the discovery process to get answers to all the questions I originally asked, questions about his finances and how he affords the lifestyle he’s living on a congressional salary. I suspect that’s the last thing Dan actually wants.”
The upshot of all this is that Crenshaw is going to appear on Ryan’s podcast for an interview.
I should make it clear that I have no idea whether Crenshaw is crooked or not. His official reports don’t show vast wealth. He has two houses, one valued at $1 million, but that price may just be a side effect of the vast inflation of housing prices in the late Biden Administration. (At one point, my house, which I bought when I was making $46,000 a year in 2004, was theoretically worth around $800,000, but the market has cooled quite a bit since then.) I assume the other house is a rental income property.
I have heard accusations of Crenshaw accumulating wealth, but they came from 2nd Congressional District primary opponent Steve Toth, who said “While Dan Crenshaw votes with Democrats and threatens conservatives, he’s also somehow gotten rich off his government salary. I had no idea he’s actually a better trader than Warren Buffett. But not quite as good as Hillary Clinton.”
I sent the following questions to the Toth campaign:
I want to follow this race for my blog, but I asked two questions that I haven’t received an answer to:
1. Can you cite examples of Dan Crenshaw benefiting financially from his office?
2. Can you cite, say, ten bills where Crenshaw’s voting pattern was insufficiently conservative?
I sent those questions off twice, and have yet to get an answer…but did get put on his campaigns mailing list for block walking notifications.
There’s certainly some dissatisfaction with Crenshaw among conservative ranks, as exhibited by the nasty “Eyepatch McCain” nickname bestowed on him. But right now, I have to judge the corruption accusations against him “unproven.”
That said, threatening to sue a podcaster who merely referenced the rumors (and not even by name) is a foolish move that’s going to raise eyebrows.
