The Houston Police Department has ordered approximately 1,200 officers to replace their SIG Sauer P320 service weapons following a lawsuit alleging the pistol’s potential for unintended discharges.
Under the new directive, officers have until the end of September to make the switch.
The decision follows a lawsuit filed by veteran HPD officer Richard Fernandez Jr., who alleges that his holstered P320 discharged without a trigger pull.
The $10 million lawsuit, filed against the pistol’s manufacturer, SIG Sauer, claims Fernandez now suffers permanent numbness in his foot as a result of the incident.
“I heard a pop, but it didn’t sound like a gunshot,” Fernandez recounted. “I looked down, saw a hole in my pant leg, and realized I was bleeding. My hand wasn’t anywhere near the gun.”
His legal team argues that SIG Sauer has long been aware of serious design flaws in the P320. The suit joins more than 100 similar claims filed nationwide since 2017, many alleging the pistols fired while holstered or after being dropped.
The P320 has a controversial track record with HPD. In 2017, tests done by HPD found the pistol can accidentally fire almost 10 percent of the time after being dropped.
I wonder if this was pre- or post-voluntary upgrade.
While it was adopted by the U.S. military in 2017 as the M17 and M18, the civilian version soon faced scrutiny following reports of “drop-fire” incidents. These concerns prompted SIG Sauer to launch a voluntary upgrade program in 2017 to address potential discharge risks.
Despite the upgrades, lawsuits have continued to emerge alleging that the P320 can still fire without the trigger being pulled.
A jury found the SIG P320 “defectively designed” in a Massachusetts police lawsuit last month.
Steve Crowder devoted a show to P320 problems, including collecting videos of uncommanded discharges:
Crowder shows four videos of police P320s going off in the holster with no one’s fingers anywhere near the trigger. In two of those instances an officer was shot. And those are just the instance where the discharge was actually captured on film, so it seems reasonable to assume that there are a whole lot more that weren’t filmed.
Crowder also notes a very significant change in the language of Sig’s denials: “Newest email. The P320 cannot, under any circumstances, discharge without the trigger first being moved to the rear. Cool. “Trigger pull” versus “moved to the rear.” You know that change had to have come straight from their legal department in a CYA memo.
Crowder also had on Brandon Herrera (who previously covered the issue) to talk about the P320:
Brandon Herrera: “ICE has released a report. Basically they were talking about all the accidental discharges that have happened with all of their service weapons. And you have multiple columns. One of them is which pistol it was. Vast majority were the P320s. Then in the other column whether or not that incident included injury. So they not only said that these things were going off, but there were multiple occasions where they were injuring people that were actively working for ICE.”
BH: “if if they admit there is a problem with the civilian side stuff, then they have to maybe go in and [do] a very expensive upgrade to all their their military contract [P320s].”
BH: “Hopefully this is a big enough deal with this airman unfortunately losing his life that Sig can no longer look the other way and pretend there isn’t a problem.”
Steve Crowder: “How do you think [Sig] scored such a big contract with at that point a relatively new pistol?
BH: “That’s an excellent question.” [long pause]
BH: “It seems like Sig has gotten a lot of these contracts. And the question is whether that was based on merit, or some other thing that I won’t say in a public setting.”
BH: “I’m frankly shocked I haven’t gotten a cease and deceased yet. A cease and desist yet. I think it might be coming soon because I think they’re at the point where they, especially this this most recent wave, they’re losing control of the narrative. Before it was easy to just say, ‘Oh, it’s a couple of grifters, you know, don’t pay any attention to them. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.’ But now, I mean, hell, it’s everybody. The the conversation is completely shifted. Very few people are defending Sig anymore on this.”
SC: “My hunch is because of the military doesn’t want to admit that they screwed up either.”
Off the topic of Sig, Herrera says he’s not eager to run for office again. “Running the first time was probably one of the worst nine-month experiences of my life. And I would love to not repeat that again, but at the same time, they’re not voting any better.”
At this point its hard to see Sig gets out of this jam short of completely withdrawing the P320 from the market. Their potential liability is huge, and replacing all military and police service arms may be ruinous, as, presumably, any sort of recall to fix the problem, even assuming that they could find a fix and provide a solution that works.
In a win for secure elections in Texas, a federal appeals court upheld a state law requiring voters to provide identification numbers on mail-in ballots, a security measure already required of in-person voters.
Judges on the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had “no difficulty concluding” that the state’s ID number requirement “fully complies” with federal law.
The appeals court published its opinion on Monday, reversing a lower court decision barring Texas election officials from rejecting mail-in ballots with wrong or missing identification numbers.
Texas lawmakers passed the ID requirement in 2021 as part of a comprehensive plan to make voting more secure and increase confidence in fraud-prone mail ballots.
Voters previously supplied just their names and addresses when applying to vote by mail.
The Biden administration sued, along with the League of Women Voters and other private plaintiffs opposed to the election integrity law.
U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez ruled in 2023 that providing a correct voter ID number is “not material in determining whether voters are qualified under Texas law to vote or cast a mail ballot” and thus the law violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Texas appealed, joined by local and national Republican groups.
A three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed Rodriguez’s ruling, clearing the way for Texas to continue enforcing the law.
Judge James Ho wrote in the August 4 opinion that “merely requiring mail-in ballot applications to list the voter’s name and registration address triggers significant election security concerns.”
That information is easily available to anyone who simply requests it from Texas election officials—who readily provide copies of voter files with such information upon request. As a result, any person can request and receive that information about a registered voter, use that information to apply for a mail-in ballot, and then cast the ballot, with minimal risk of detection. This insecurity was addressed when the Texas Legislature enacted the Election Protection and Integrity Act of 2021.
“We have no difficulty concluding that this ID number requirement fully complies with a provision of federal law known by the parties as the materiality provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act,” wrote Ho.
The ID number requirement is obviously designed to confirm that each mail-in ballot voter is precisely who he claims he is. And that is plainly “material” to “determining whether such individual is qualified under State law to vote.”
Judge Ho noted courts “have repeatedly found that mail-in ballots are particularly susceptible to fraud.”
The most shocking thing about the ongoing Russiagate revelations is that none of them are shocking to anyone who was following the stories as they originally unfolded.
The Russiagate scandal has long been one of the most convoluted, hard-to-follow news stories of all time. It even has multiple names thanks to its peculiar chronology. From 2016 until April 2019 — while Democrats still held out hope of “presidency-wrecking” revelations that would topple Donald Trump — it was generally known as the Trump-Russia scandal. After Special Counsel Robert Mueller broke the hearts of MSNBC audiences by issuing a report without new indictments, attention began to be cast on the scandal’s fraudulent construction, how it was propped up by political spying, illegal leaks, and WMD-style intelligence fakery. Trump and others began to call it Spygate or the Russia hoax, but the name that stuck was Russiagate.
That’s a decent enough summary.
Those of us who covered the story from the start had a difficult time explaining to audiences what it was, as we ourselves didn’t know.
Despite the fact that Taibbi has been miles and miles better than MSM journalists on the issue, here I have to disagree.
Just about all the broad details of the story have been know for quite a while: Powerful figures at the top of the Democratic Party and the national intelligence community illegally spied on and lied about Donald Trump in an effort to distract from Hillary’s email server crimes and drag her ambulatory corpse across the finish line of the 2016 Presidential Election. When that failed, those same forces conspired to render the newly elected Trump45 Administration ineffective by converting those lies into investigations and bogus impeachment proceedings. And the biased media ran cover for the lies.
It wasn’t the start of a corruption story about Trump, but the cover-up of a still-unresolved Hillary Clinton scandal. This is purely a Clinton corruption story, probably the last in a long line, as neither Bill nor Hillary will have careers when it’s finished, if they stay out of jail. Characteristically, the most powerful political family since the Kennedys won’t just bring many individuals down with them, but whole institutions, as the FBI, the CIA, the presidency of Barack Obama, and a dozen or so of the most celebrated brands in commercial media will see their names blackened forever through association with this idiotic caper. A fair number of those media companies should (and likely will) go out of business.
And, of course, many of the same bad actors did it all over again by supressing the Hunter Biden laptop story.
The former spy chief who organized and co-authored the infamous Hunter Biden laptop letter ahead of the 2020 election also played a key role in helping Hillary Clinton in 2016 smear Donald Trump by tying him to Russia’s Vladimir Putin.
Mike Morell, the former acting CIA director, injected into the American political bloodstream the idea that Trump was an “agent” of Putin and Russia, a refrain that would be repeated over and over again by the Clinton campaign.
Similar to recruiting 51 ex-spies in 2020 to falsely claim the laptop was somehow tied to Russia, Morell also led a letter in 2016 signed by over 50 former national security officials who insinuated Trump had nefarious links to Putin’s Russia.
Snip.
Public records show Clinton herself, in coordination with Palmieri, her campaign general counsel Marc Elias, campaign manager Robby Mook, campaign chairman John Podesta, campaign policy adviser Jake Sullivan, and others launched an effort to link Trump to Putin as the 2016 battle for the White House raged.
The Clinton campaign also funded through its law firm British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s now-discredited dossier and spread the false claims of a secret communications channel between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank.
Newly declassified evidence dubbed the “Clinton Plan intelligence” included purported intercepted communications from a George Soros ally suggesting that Clinton’s 2016 campaign against Trump was plotting an effort to demonize the Republican nominee by connecting him to Putin, and that the Clinton campaign expected the FBI would put more fuel on the fire.
The declassified revelations from special counsel John Durham’s report included purported emails from Leonard Benardo, a top official at George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, and alleged communications by Clinton foreign policy adviser Julianne Smith. Benardo denied writing the messages, while Smith said she didn’t remember having done so but couldn’t rule out proposing such a Clinton plan.
The newly declassified annex of the report also shows Durham found some corroborating evidence for the intercepts but concluded the purported emails from Benardo were likely mashups or composites of what Russian spies had probably collected from multiple Clinton allies.
Smith was the head of the Clinton campaign’s Europe team and worked as a foreign policy advisor for the failed 2016 bid. Smith had been deputy national security advisor to then-Vice President Joe Biden during the Obama administration.
There are some new names there…but also a lot of old ones. Podesta. Mook. Sullivan. Soros. (But I have to ask: Why did Clinton’s campaign need a “Europe team?” Was that outreach for Americans abroad, or a conduit to illegal contributions and bribes.)
All of the broad strokes, and many of the details, where known to the readers of this blog at the time, as well people following Instapundit, ZeroHedge, Conservative Tree House, National Review, Powerline, and any of thousands of twitter accounts. Even the relatively new news that Obama himself knew the Russiagate and approved of them to get Trump is not a shocking revelation to anyone who’s been paying attention. We already knew Obama was a nasty piece of work.
The only people shocked by these revelations are Democrats, possibly because some old school Democrats have finally been so disgusted by their party’s hard left turn to radical social justice, transsexual lunacy, socialism and antisemitism that they’re finally willing to look at facts they previously rejected.
According to a Rasmussen poll released Monday, nearly two-thirds of voters (65%) are following declassified releases over the past month by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) “very closely” (32%) or “somewhat closely” (33%), repudiating the calculated media silence about the Obama administration’s fake narratives and manipulation of intelligence to frame Trump as a Kremlin stooge to cover up Clinton’s wrongdoing.
The poll of 1,172 likely voters, conducted July 29-31, shows 54% believe Obama administration officials committed serious crimes in “manipulating intelligence,” with 37% saying it’s “very likely” and 17% saying it’s “somewhat likely.”
A staggering 69% agree it is critical that the perpetrators be held accountable “for the survival of our country.”
Even more disturbing for Democrats is that it’s not just Republicans who are concerned. The poll shows 56% of Democrats are following the investigation, 32% believe serious crimes were committed and 59% agree the perpetrators must be “held accountable.” The respective Republican comparison is 75%, 83% and 86%.
Hispanics are more cynical about the scandal than either black or white voters, with 66% saying serious crimes were committed and 74% wanting accountability, compared to 51% and 65%, respectively, for blacks and 53% and 69%, respectively, for whites.
Men are more concerned than women, with 74% vs. 59% following the revelations closely, 60% vs. 49% believing there is serious criminality, and 72% vs. 66% favoring accountability.
It’s a demonstration of the impotence of Democrat-allied media, like the New York Times, Washington Post, ABC, NBC and CBS, which showered themselves with praise and Pulitzer Prizes for their since-debunked stories about Russiagate and are hoping their audience is willing to be duped again. But like the boy who cried wolf, no one is listening anymore.
Maybe we’ll finally see the Russiagate hoax masters punished and sent to jail, but given how many tools the Deep State has at its disposal, I have my doubts.
The Harris County Sheriff’s Office released a 17-minute surveillance video depicting the chaotic and fatal altercation involving 32-year-old inmate Alexis Cardenas during the booking-out process from the Harris County Jail….[Viewer discretion warning snipped.]
The footage—mostly from jail security cameras with no audio—shows officers opening a door to release Cardenas, who appears reluctant to leave. When officers place hands on him, Cardenas backs away with his hands up before being forcefully pushed toward the exit.
I would embed the video here, but it’s age-restricted. So I’ll include a few screen caps.
During the escalating struggle, his shirt, pants, and shoes come off—some tossed out the door—and he repeatedly tries to re-enter the secure area.
As an officer opens the internal security door, Cardenas darts toward it, prompting a physical confrontation. Cardenas grabs an officer’s leg, bringing them both to the ground. An attempted taser deployment appears ineffective, and Cardenas manages to break free, running through the security door into the inmate area.
Another inmate shoves Cardenas into an officer, who responds with a knee to the chest.
From that point forward, multiple officers pin Cardenas to the ground, face-down. At least one hand is cuffed, and at one point, his cuffed hand strikes an officer during the scuffle. Eventually, officers notice Cardenas has gone unresponsive. CPR is initiated but unsuccessful. He was later pronounced dead at St. Joseph Medical Center.
His cause of death remains pending with the Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences.
The Texas Rangers, Harris County DA’s Office, and Sheriff’s Office are all investigating. The Texas Commission on Jail Standards has not yet ruled whether this constitutes an in-custody death, which would mark the 12th this year.
There are numerous odd things about this incident, the first and foremost one being that most people want to be released from jail, and don’t try to prolong their stay. 75% of the blame for this incident is on the perp that violently resisted officers for unclear reasons. (I know Houston summer heat and humidity is brutal…) Normally I’d wonder if he was high as a kite, but that seems unlikely for someone leaving jail rather than entering it.
But a good 25% is the jailers apparently not being trained well enough to be able to control an inmate without holding the guy down to the point he stops breathing. Especially post-George Floyd.
At the very least, better training seems in order.
Japan is beset by many problems, most notably spiraling national debt and a collapsing birth rate. But they don’t lack technological savvy or civic foresight, as indicated by the massive disaster recovery infrastructure expansion they’re investing in for Tokyo.
What does Tokyo have to worry about? Earthquakes, fires, typhoons, floods, and volcanoes (including iconic Mount Fuji). “This city is constantly on the brink of disaster.”
“This is a city that really shouldn’t be here, but it is, because engineers have developed some of the most extensive and advanced countermeasures anywhere in the world. But it’s not enough.”
“The number of threats Tokyo faces, and the damage those threats could cause is only getting worse. A quarter of Japan’s population now lives in the greater Tokyo area, and the city center accounts for more than 20% of this country’s GDP. If disaster struck now, it wouldn’t just be bad for Tokyo. It will have a knock-on effect for this entire country and even the world. This place, this city, really matters.”
“But Tokyo is not exactly a city that does things by half measures. So when it came to protect yourself from annihilation, they decided to go big by building one of the biggest civil defense projects in history.”
“This is the Pacific Ring of Fire, a 40,000 kilometer tectonic belt. It was this that forced Japan out of the sea in the first place, but also left it studded with volcanoes, 111 of which are still active today. And while you only need two plates growing together to create some seismic activity, Japan lies across four, which means this one country is struck by 18% of all the world’s earthquakes.”
“And as if all that wasn’t enough, thousands of kilometers of ocean to the south, that leaves it wide open to typhoons and tsunamis rolling in from the Pacific.”
“Throughout its history, Tokyo has been quite literally razed to the ground numerous times. But now with 40 million people living here, that simply can’t happen again. Which is why in December 2022, the city’s governments hatched a plan. The Tokyo Resilience Project.”
“It’s going to take 18 years to fully complete and cost ¥17 trillion, which is around 109 billion USD.”
“Flooding is a critical threat to Tokyo, 124km², a fifth of central Tokyo, lies below sea level, so the TRP is not taking any chances.”
“Over the last 40 years, the amounts of heavy downpours have almost doubled in Japan. Flooding was a daily part of life in Tokyo. And it was only getting worse. In 1992, the city’s government embarked on an extraordinary project in response to this challenge, an underground system made up of five silos which collect flood water from nearby rivers and channel it down a 6.5km tunnel into this huge hall.”
“This is the metropolitan area, outer underground discharge channel, or G-CANs for short. It is a water tank. It is an enormous space 25m high. It’s 50m beneath the city streets, 177m long and 78m wide. This place cost 2 billion USD and took 17 years to build. Now it’s capable of pumping out 200 tons of water a second.”
“While the scale of this place might be mind boggling, here’s the thing. The Tokyo Resilience Project is working on doubling the capacity of this system.”
The water diversion channels are similarly massive. “This space is 12.4m wide. It runs for 5.4km, or it will do when they finished building, it and it’s going to connect up to two other tunnels to create a network that’s 13km long.”
This massive project requires equally massive machinery. “To dig this channel, engineers constructed an enormous [tunnel boring machine] nearly 12m wide, weighing in at a massive 2800 tons…Just ahead of me up here is the massive cutting head is pushing forward through the soil. 12.5m wide rotating rounds to dig out this huge hole.”
The video also shows a giant rock friction apparatus that tests how earthquake fault slips occur.
The Mori JP Tower, completed in 2023, isn’t just a the skyscraper in Japan. “Five stories beneath the streets of Tokyo, directly under that super tall skyscraper that’s rising above my head. You’ll find this: back up in the generators, a huge water supply fed by an underground, well. Extensive food supplies, batteries and amazing series of systems that enable this building to keep running independently should the worst happen in the surrounding city.” Even the huge backup generator is on isolation springs.
“These diesel generators work alongside a massive bank of batteries in case of an emergency so that if a disaster destroys the power grids, the tower can be completely self-sufficient. It’s so safe here that the skyscraper acts as a refuge for people in the area. Inside this storeroom are enough supplies to feed 3600 people for three days. These kits include everything from tinned food, bottled water, toilets and even baby supplies.”
“None of this would mean anything if the building wasn’t still standing in the first place. Part of this tower’s earthquake defenses are made up of hundreds of pistons known as oil dampers located all around the building.”
“About 86km² of Tokyo is still densely packed with old wooden housing, which is a high risk of secondary fires. Neighborhoods like these have been earmarked for redevelopments which will feature new roads to buildings and parks to act as firebreaks. And that’s not all. Overhead wires and cables like these are prone to collapsing and starting fires. And that’s why over 1000km of roads across the city are having their overhead utilities replaced and moved underground.” The utility change is no doubt long overdue, but I fear redevelopment will change the charm of old Tokyo.
There’s a lot to learn here for disaster recovery preparation for American cities. Houston is another broad, flat cities that get flooding from hurricanes. (As is New Orleans, but its gumbo-like soil makes building massive underground infrastructure like this difficult.)
Los Angeles and San Francisco could certainly learn earthquake and disaster recover lessons from Tokyo, but we all know such massive infrastructure projects are all but impossible to complete in Democrat-run blue cities in blue states. The regulatory burden is all but insurmountable, and even then, vast amounts of money allocated to the project are inevitably raked off in graft for the hard left…
Remember the lawsuit Texas and other states filed against BlackRock and other companies for prioritizing Environmental Social Governance (ESG) over shareholder return? The case is now moving forward.
A Texas federal judge will allow a lawsuit to proceed wherein a coalition of states, including Texas, sued the world’s largest asset managers for allegedly engaging in antitrust violations and consumer protection practices.
Texas and 12 other Republican-led states filed suit against BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, accusing them of using their “collective power — by proxy voting and otherwise — to pressure the major coal producers to reduce production of coal, and in particular production of the thermal coal used to generate the electricity that powers American homes and businesses.”
The lawsuit alleges that the firms “routinely violated its pledge to investors” by using their holdings to invest and advance “climate goals” as well as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. “Rather than individually wield their shareholdings to reduce coal output, therefore,” the lawsuit asserts, “Defendants effectively formed a syndicate and agreed to use their collective holdings of publicly traded coal companies to induce industry-wide output reductions.”
Judge Jeremy Kernodle of the Eastern District of Texas dismissed, in part, motions by the investing firms to dismiss the case, stating that the states “have identified enough circumstantial evidence to suggest that Defendants agreed to collectively pressure coal companies to reduce the output of coal in the relevant markets and disclose future output information.”
The motion to dismiss from BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street was filed back in March, calling the grounds for the lawsuit “based on half-baked and untested theories.”
“We make these investments on behalf of our clients, and our focus is on delivering them financial returns,” Blackrock told The Texan in December last year, after the initial lawsuit was filed.
“The suggestion that BlackRock has invested money in companies with the goal of harming those companies is baseless and defies common sense. This lawsuit undermines Texas’ pro-business reputation and discourages investments in the companies consumers rely on.”
In May, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a “statement of interest” supporting the claims against BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, stating that the case “alleges not merely typical investor behavior, but the active, anticompetitive use of common shareholdings to reduce the production of American coal to the detriment of American consumers and businesses.”
“In sum,” Kernodle writes in the order, “it is plausible that Defendants did what they publicly said they were going to do: use their stock to decrease the output of coal.”
With Kernodle’s order, the suit will proceed with discovery and a trial to determine whether these major investment managers violated antitrust and consumer deception laws.
“BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard — three of the most powerful financial corporations in the world — created an investment cartel to illegally control national energy markets and squeeze more money out of hardworking Americans,” Attorney General Ken Paxton wrote in a press release following the order by Kernodle.
Being a large investment company with literally trillions in assets, BlackRock has a lot of fingers in a lot of different pies. Despite being on the receiving end of a potentially very expensive, Texas-led lawsuit, they’re also opening a stock exchange in Texas and has a stock fund based solely on Texas companies. Evidently Texas is simply too profitable a state to ignore, lawsuit or no lawsuit.
BlackRock et. al. should abandon ESG, stop tying their fortunes to fighting the boogeyman of “climate change,” get out of leftist politics entirely and narrow their focus to making money for their investors.
President Trump wins another huge (and hugely favorable) trade deal for America, more Obama/Clinton skullduggery exposed, a whole lot of sick perverts get arrested, Nigel Farage plays Cassandra, Russia gets hammered by both Ukraine and God, plus an unusually high amount of hypercars and Star Trek.
It’s the Friday LinkSwarm!
Winning: “Trump strikes massive trade deal with EU on energy, arms, tariffs.”
The United States has reached a trade deal with the European Union after President Donald Trump pressured the group of nations, as well as others, to open up trade with the US using the threat of tariffs.
While being joined by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Trump detailed the plans for the deal. “The European Union is going to agree to purchase from the United States $750 billion worth of energy.”
“They are going to agree to invest, into the United States, $600 billion more than they’re investing already. So they’re investing a large amount of money. … They’re agreeing to open up their countries to trade at zero tariff,” Trump added. “So that’s a very big factor, opening up their countries. All of the countries will be opened up to trade with the United States at zero tariff, and they’re agreeing to purchase a vast amount of military equipment.”
The president added that the number for the military equipment is not exact, and then also said the EU imports to the US will have a “straight across tariff of 15 percent” on automobiles and other goods. The tariffs on EU goods were previously in the single digits on average, according to the New York Times. The EU had hoped to reach an agreement for 10 percent across the board on tariffs.
The Very Best People repeatedly told us that President Trump’s tariff strategy would inevitably plunge us into a trade war and send the economy into a recession, if not a recession. It turns out, once again, that Trump has far better grasp of negotiating strategy than they do.
When Mr. Trump first unveiled his reciprocal tariffs, virtually all the important foreign countries flocked to make a deal with him; they ignored Communist China.
Why is that? Because America’s the greatest country in the world. With the best economy.
And nobody trusts the Chinese to do anything, much less honor a trade deal.
What’s more, Mr. Trump and his team have already made a number of deals with the United Kingdom, the European Union, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan, and South Korea.
Talks with Mexico are constructive and will be extended.
We can’t be sure, but it’s likely that the China talks will be extended.
In general, Mr. Trump is charging a very modest 15 percent or 20 percent fee as the price for doing business with the greatest economy in the world.
That modest fee could generate something like $400 billion a year in tariff revenues.
And here’s his new wrinkle: vast foreign direct investment into America
For example, $600 billion from the EU, and perhaps another $600 billion from Japan. Maybe $750 billion from EU energy purchases. Think clean burning LNG produced by America’s first in the world energy industry.
Direct investment pledges of as much as $5 trillion or $6 trillion coming from governments and companies all around the world — including the Middle East. And even in Asia — with South Korea putting up $350 billion.
We’ll learn more about how this direct investment is going to work, but the point is — the stimulus from all of that vastly outweighs any fiscal drag from the mostly moderate reciprocal tariff rates.
That’s Mr. Trump’s brand-new wrinkle. And it’s a very clever ploy.
FBI Director Kash Patel found a trove of sensitive documents related to the origins of the Trump – Russia probe buried in multiple ‘burn bags’ in a secret room inside the bureau, sources told Fox News Digital.
Sources told Fox News Digital that the ‘burn bag’ system is used to destroy documents designated as classified or higher.
Sources told Fox News Digital that multiple burn bags were found and filled with thousands of documents.
Sources exclusively briefed Fox News Digital on some of the contents of the classified annex — including that the U.S. intelligence community had credible foreign sources indicating that the FBI would play a role in spreading the alleged Trump – Russia collusion narrative — before the bureau ever launched its controversial Crossfire Hurricane probe.
A source familiar with the contents of the classified annex told Fox News Digital that while it may not have been exactly clear in the moment what the intelligence collection meant, with the benefit of hindsight, it predicted the FBI’s next move ‘with alarming specificity.’
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took members of the press corps to task over their refusal to cover newly released evidence that shows Hillary Clinton approved the Russian collusion hoax against Donald Trump.
Leavitt’s comments come on the heels of a newly declassified appendix to the Durham Report that exposes a reported Clinton campaign plan to falsely accuse President Trump of collusion with Russia.
Leavitt chided members of the press, telling them, “This is a story that every outlet in this room should be covering,” and that “This is further evidence that Hillary Clinton approved the Russia Hoax against President Trump. Her campaign financed it.”
Leavitt added that “the FBI and the CIA were both weaponized to accelerate this hoax against then-candidate and former president Trump.”
The Press Secretary told reporters that, “The president wants to see justice served and he trusts the Attorney General and the Department of Justice to implement that justice and hold these people accountable.”
The so-called “Durham annex” to John Durham’s Special Counsel report was released yesterday by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and brings previously classified information to light regarding the Clinton campaign’s plans to falsely tie Trump to Russia.
In a press release, Grassley said, “History will show that the Obama and Biden administration’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies were weaponized against President Trump. This political weaponization has caused critical damage to our institutions and is one of the biggest political scandals and cover-ups in American history. The new Trump administration has a tremendous responsibility to the American people to fix the damage done and do so with maximum speed and transparency.”
Travel back in time to the year 2021 and you might find yourself in the middle of a bizarre debate over the virtues of “cancel culture”. At the time the political left was aggressively trying to secure long term power within the US through a multi-pronged psychological offensive – A war on the minds of the masses designed to force Americans into submission.
A big part of their strategy relied on the fundamentals of Cultural Marxism: The combination of Marxist mob tactics, artificial consensus and the exploitation of minority grievances as a vehicle for controlling speech. This was the rise of the “woke movement” to the halls of government.
The root of their power was not martial. In fact, the political left is weak and largely astroturf with minimal ability to project power in a physical way. If conservatives wanted to destroy them tomorrow the task would be relatively easy. We don’t because many of us still have hope that our problems can be solved through peaceful discourse.
What the leftists did have at their disposal was a massive institutional apparatus of government agencies, corporations, Big Tech and NGOs. The full might of the establishment cabal was on their side, which meant they had the means to enforce “cancel culture” and silence their ideological opponents.
I don’t think there has ever been a psychological war on a population that was more pervasive and tyrannical. Not since Mao’s Cultural Revolution in China has a citizenry been under such a siege by their own government. The fact that we survived this event, defeated the onslaught and actually grew a grassroots anti-woke movement without the use of social media forums is truly mind blowing.
Very few people today realize the level of victory that was achieved. We thwarted perhaps the largest 4th Generation “mind war” ever devised and we did it without any institutional access. We won by simple truth and word of mouth.
Another tool that the leftists and globalists used was the mobilization of illegal migrants, gays and minorities as a shield against criticism or counter-protest. If conservatives and moderates fought back with superior debate or our own protest groups, we were immediately accused of racism, xenophobia and homophobia. Merely presenting an opposing view to the progressive machine was considered an act of evil.
Large contingents within all of these groups were happy to go along with the agenda for numerous reasons.
First and foremost, DEI allowed them to easily game the system. They could snatch up grants, subsidies, welfare, and leapfrog over more talented and more intelligent competitors in education and business simply because of their “marginalized status”.
Secondly, the system under progressives was two-tier; leftists activists, illegals and minorities were given preferential protection while breaking the law and causing chaos. Conservatives were labeled terrorists for any act of defiance. We were banned from the largest web platforms. Some of us were targeted by the online mob and lost our jobs. Others were “de-banked” and threatened with ostracism from the economy. Still others were imprisoned.
This imbalance of the law bred a culture of entitlement, especially within the LGBT cult and the black community. Illegal aliens were given carte blanche to enter the country and feed like parasites. Not only that, but they were treated like heroes coming to save the US from “population decline” and “labor shortages”.
They all participated in the game willfully and joyfully. They were ALL part of the problem. But, of course, none of them ever thought the party would end or that they might end up facing consequences for their behavior. They joined in the feeding frenzy without considering the inevitable clap-back.
The primary argument that leftists would often use to defend the application of cancel culture was that there was “no such thing as cancel culture”, only the righteous utilization of “consequence culture”. This was, of course, a misdirection. The word “consequence” suggests that a person deserves punishment for wrongdoing and that the leftists canceling him (or her) have the right to do so.
Cancel culture was never about justice or karma, it was about suppression of anyone who disagreed with the political left. A corrupt group of psychopathic people with no support from the majority is in no position to dole out consequences. They can dole out harassment and intimidation, but not justice.
In recent months, however, I think these people are finally beginning to understand what “consequence culture” really is and clearly they don’t like it.
We told them over, and over, and over again that the left wouldn’t like it when the “new rules” they were creating got applied to them. And here we are.
Annals of human depravity: “FBI, DOJ arrest ringleaders of dark web child porn exploitation networks with over 120,000 users.”
The Justice Department has announced the results of Operation Grayskull, a sweeping joint investigation with the FBI that dismantled four dark web sites dedicated to child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The operation has so far resulted in 18 convictions across multiple federal districts and significant sentences for offenders involved in the distribution and advertisement of CSAM.
One of the most notable sentences came last week, when Thomas Peter Katsampes, 52, of Eagan, Minnesota, was sentenced to 250 months in prison, lifetime supervised release, and ordered to pay $23,000 in restitution. Katsampes pleaded guilty in February to conspiracy to advertise and distribute child pornography. According to court records, he joined one of the dark web sites in 2022, actively advertised and distributed CSAM, including material depicting prepubescent children, and eventually became a site moderator responsible for enforcing posting rules and advising others on sharing illegal content.
The Houston branch of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested 214 illegal aliens who have either been charged with or convicted of child sex offenses over the past six months — more than it arrested in all of Fiscal Year 2024.
Among the five illegal aliens captured and highlighted in an ICE press release published on Monday, four were from Mexico and were deported back there following their arrests. Forty-eight-year-old Jorge Zebra received convictions for two counts of sexual assault of a minor as well as “sexual indecency” with a minor. He was returned to Mexico in March.
Mexicans Sergio Rolando Galvan Guerrero and Jesus Gutierrez Mireles were convicted for “aggravated sexual assault of a child” as well as for Driving While Intoxicated.
Jose Guadalupe Meza, who’s been deported four other times, was convicted of both sexual assault of a child and theft. Meza was deported to Mexico on June 25.
The lone criminal from El Salvador was Manuel Antonio Castro-Juarez, who was convicted for both sexual assault of a child as well as illegal entry, twice. He’ll be sent back to El Salvador for the third time, but is in ICE custody until necessary proceedings are completed.
“Former Texas National Guardsman Convicted of Smuggling Aliens. Mario Sandoval now faces up to 10 years in federal prison.”
A Houston-based former member of the Texas National Guard who once served on the front lines of Operation Lone Star is now facing up to 10 years in prison after a federal jury convicted him of human smuggling.
Mario Sandoval, a 27-year-old Houston resident and former national guardsman, was deployed to the U.S.-Mexico border as part of Operation Lone Star, the Texas-led initiative launched in 2021 to curb illegal immigration. The operation mobilized both the Texas National Guard and Department of Public Safety.
Despite being released from his official orders, Sandoval remained in the Rio Grande Valley and, in July of last year, began smuggling illegal aliens north of the immigration checkpoint. Jurors were shown text messages confirming Sandoval’s coordination in the smuggling operation—including his role arranging drivers and alerting others to law enforcement locations. Surveillance footage also placed him near the checkpoint during the times those messages were sent.
Sandoval was discharged from the Texas National Guard in October 2024. Although he claimed the texts were taken out of context and that no conspiracy existed, a jury found him guilty after a one-day trial and less than an hour of deliberation.
“We live increasingly in a lawless Britain… most people think that Britain has become lawless”, Farage remarked Monday at a press conference to launch a new law and order policy platform.
“We’re actually facing, in many parts of our country, nothing short of societal collapse,” Farage warned, adding “People are scared to go out to the shops, scared to let their kids out. That is a society that is degraded, and it’s happening very, very rapidly.”
Farage further suggested that Britain should leave the European Court of Human Rights in order to restore effective criminal deterrence.
Farage maintains that the ECHR undermines the country’s ability to deport foreign criminals, terrorists, and illegal migrants, thereby weakening criminal deterrence.
He contends that exiting the system would remove legal barriers imposed by foreign judges, and allow the UK to swiftly remove dangerous individuals, free up prison space, reduce taxpayer burdens, and send a strong message that crime by non-citizens will result in certain expulsion.
This, in his view, would restore effective deterrence by ensuring consequences are enforced without interference, discouraging both criminal activity and illegal immigration.
Among a range of policies he outlined to avoid a descent into societal collapse, Farage suggested outsourcing hardened criminals to foreign jails and a hard-line three-strikes and you’re out rule, meaning after three convictions there would be no more rehabilitation for offenders.
He noted that one of the most egregious aspects of the collapse is that the government is obsessed with drilling it into the British people that everything is getting better when citizens can see the rampant degradation all around them.
“Huge numbers of law-abiding, taxpaying Britons have also lost respect for the police but in a different way. The idea, the concept that we’re living in a system of two-tier policing and two-tier justice under two-tier Keir has really taken hold,” Farage urged.
Farage noted that crimes such as shoplifting and drug taking have been allowed to become a part of everyday life in cities, and that one in three Londoners have now been victims of mobile phone theft.
He vowed that his party will work to halve crime in five years if elected to parliament by becoming “the toughest party on law and order and on crime that this country has ever seen”, and instituting “zero tolerance policing.”
Farage also floated the idea of Army run centres for repeat petty criminals to be held in and made to undergo a program of reform.
He pointed to Rudy Giuliani’s tenure as Mayor of New York City as an example of how to restore law and order in a broken down society.
The Tories could have been the party of border control and tough on crime policies, but their feckless wet leadership pissed the opportunity away.
Ukrainian troops also landed on the Tendrovo Spit, a long sandbar south of Kherson. I’m including this one because it includes a closer look at some of Russia’s drone jamming equipment.
Here’s some great outside-the-box thinking: A wounded Ukrainian soldier behind enemy lines was rescued by a drone lowering an E-bike to him.
It would take a heart of stone not to laugh: “‘Crisis’ at Media Matters, As It Cuts Staff, Struggles to Pay Legal Bills.” Golly, a whole lot of lefty outlets seem to be in trouble now that Trump47 is eliminating the graft at places like USAID… (Hat tip: Stephen Green at Instapundit.)
What too much winning looks like: “The Corporation for Public Broadcasting will shut down by September’s end, the private non-profit that is funded almost entirely by Congress announced on Friday.”
Soros-funded prosecutor = brothel boom in Fairfax County. “How did the state’s largest municipality, a wealthy and highly educated suburb of Washington, D.C., become a sanctuary county for pimps, madams, and whorehouse operators? All signs point to the Commonwealth’s attorney, self-styled progressive prosecutor Steve Descano.””County Supervisor Pat Herrity said that about 80 to 100 ‘illicit massage businesses’ are ‘operating in plain sight today’ in the county.”
The latest event that’s now too dangerous to attend: Jazz festivals, as a crowd of black people beat two white people unconscious. Then Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge tried to downplay the attack saying that the assault was taken “out of context.”
Candace Taylor, 35, of Slidell, was arrested Monday after investigators found she underreported her income to qualify for the program. The Louisiana Bureau of Investigation launched its probe after a complaint from the state health department.
The Fox News report says court records say Taylor ran six businesses that brought in over $9.5 million between 2020 and 2024. Bank records show deposits of $480,994, including more than $325,000 linked to her businesses.
“From 2021 through 2024, Ms. Taylor continued to transfer tens of thousands of dollars between her personal and business accounts, with personal inflows consistently exceeding the eligibility thresholds for Medicaid,” the affidavit states.
Despite this, Taylor allegedly kept renewing her benefits—most recently claiming $4,000 in monthly income without disclosing she owned the business.
Authorities say her spending included $45,086 in Audi vehicle payments, a $100,000 wire to an exotic car dealer, and $13,000 for a 2022 Lamborghini Urus. She also allegedly withdrew multiple six-figure cashier’s checks for property, cosmetic surgery, jewelry, and luxury services.
Unless it was very hot or very crashed, there’s no way she paid $13,000 for a Lamborghini Urus, as those things go for over $200,000. Maybe that was a down payment…
Progress on civil rights: “California Law Requiring Background Checks for Ammo Declared Unconstitutional.”
But the Democrat Party’s desire to disarm law-abiding American citizens never rests. Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy filed a bill to raise the National Firearms Act tax to $4,709. (Hat tip: Stephen Green at Instapundit.)
Entertainment economics: Stephen Colbert isn’t worth $20 million a year. but South Park is worth over $1 billion.
“Texas Democrat Candidate Flips Out During Hearing, Winds Up Getting Arrested.” “Isaiah Martin’s attempt to filibuster the redistricting hearing ended in cuffs as he was dragged away from the microphone by a capitol security official.” Martin is currently running in a special election for the 18th Congressional District following the death of Shelia Jackson Lee, and is currently polling at 3%.
The Trump administration’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has officially withdrawn the Land Protection Plan that would have enabled a dramatic expansion of the Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge in West Texas, a move celebrated by Texas lawmakers and land rights advocates as a major victory for private property rights.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced the withdrawal on Wednesday, with Service Principal Deputy Director Justin Shirley explaining it is “consistent with the priorities of the Trump administration” by “reducing regulatory burdens, strengthening partnerships with state and local stakeholders, and ensuring responsible stewardship of taxpayer resources.”
Originally finalized under the Biden administration, the Muleshoe Land Protection Plan would have allowed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to expand the refuge from its current 6,440 acres to up to 700,000 acres—an increase of over 10,000 percent—by purchasing land or acquiring conservation easements from willing sellers across a vast area of Texas and New Mexico.
No, you can’t eat 700,000 acres using regulatory fiat. Not yours.
The Biden proposal would have eaten up land in 15 Texas counties, including Bailey, Castro, Cochran, Crosby, Dawson, Gaines, Garza, Hale, Hockley, Lamb, Lubbock, Lynn, Parmer, Terry, and Yoakum. The expansion into five counties in New Mexico includes land from Chaves, Curry, De Baca, Lea, and Roosevelt counties. The proposed map showed the feds “protecting” land right up to the edge of Lubbock.
This move was portrayed by the administration as part of its broader “30×30” initiative to conserve 30 percent of U.S. lands and waters by 2030.
Both the Muleshoe expansion plan and the 30×30 plan in general smacked of the sort of unauthorized, self-directed bureaucratic empire-building that the Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo decision struck down.
The project engendered strong opposition from Texas representatives, including House Budget Chairman Jodey Arrington (R–Lubbock), who played a pivotal role in the reversal.
Arrington argued the plan was an “outrageous land grab” that threatened the property rights and livelihoods of West Texans, especially local farmers, ranchers, and energy producers.
He introduced legislation—the No Federal Expansion Designation (No FED) in West Texas Act—to specifically prohibit the expansion.
Arrington’s amendment to defund the proposed expansion successfully passed the House in July 2024 as part of the fiscal year 2025 Interior Appropriations Bill.
Multiple efforts, including public hearings, letters to federal authorities, and vocal messaging against the plan, culminated in President Trump’s executive orders prioritizing energy development and property rights, which underpinned the Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to withdraw the LPP.
Issue by issue, the gross leftwing overreach of the Biden Administration is being reigned in and replaced with respect for the constitution, the rule of law, and private property rights.
At lot of the tales of corruption out of China are sad, sordid stories. This one is too, but it’s also pretty funny, in an ironic sort of way.
China has appointed Shi Yinle, former abbot of White Horse Temple, as the new head of the Shaolin Temple—just two days after the monastery confirmed that longtime abbot Shi Yongxin was under investigation for alleged financial crimes and sexual misconduct, according to the South China Morning Post.
“Sexual misconduct.” Yeah, I bet Chinese officials frown on monks making the sign of the two-humped ox. While there are exceptions, that “refraining from sex” part is usually non-negotiable for the monastic lifestyle. “I want to be a lifeguard, but I don’t want to get wet.” Good luck with that.
As for the “financial crimes,” it doesn’t sound like he was trying very hard to escape the wheel of existence, does it?
“In accordance with the regulations on the appointment of abbots of Chinese Buddhist Temples, after democratic evaluation and approval by the Shaolin Temple and following the relevant procedures, Venerable Yinle was invited to be the abbot of the Shaolin Temple,” the temple said Tuesday.
Shi Yongxin, who led Shaolin for over 25 years, has been stripped of his Buddhist credentials, and companies linked to him have been deregistered. The Buddhist Association of China condemned his actions as “severely damaging to the reputation of Buddhism and the image of monks” and confirmed that his ordination certificate was revoked.
I doubt Yongxin has damaged the reputation of Buddhism at large, but rather the Chinese communist-approved version. Indeed, the very nature of Buddhism, which sees the world of the senses as an illusion, would seem to be fundamentally opposed to a political creed founded on “scientific materialism.” It seems the latter would inevitably corrupt the former. And so it has.
The Shaolin Temple, a UNESCO World Heritage site in Henan and birthplace of Zen Buddhism and Shaolin kung fu, announced that Yongxin was accused of embezzling temple funds, misusing assets, and maintaining long-term improper relationships with multiple women, fathering children in violation of monastic vows.
The SCMP writes that on Tuesday, the abbot’s courtyard was sealed off for “cultural relic preservation,” and an inscription honoring Yongxin’s leadership was covered. Locals criticized the disgraced abbot as a “playboy monk” who “tarnished the image of Buddhism.”
The overarching ethos of modern China seems to get rich by whatever means necessary, no matter the consequences or shortcuts taken along the way. Yongxin seems to have taken this ethos to heart over the teachings of the Buddha.
But to be fair, he’s not the first monk to take this route, as Thai monk Wirapol Sukphol, a “fugitive Buddhist monk with a penchant for aviator sunglasses, Louis Vuitton luggage and travelling in private jets,” was sentenced to over 100 years in prison for money laundering, as well as raping a 13 year old.
The illusory world seems to be a constant temptation…
Good news for the central Texas economy: Samsung’s new Taylor fab is going to build AI chips for Telsa.
Tesla’s next-generation AI6 chip, designed to power the Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, will be manufactured at Samsung’s new, massive chip fabrication plant in Texas, strategically located near Tesla’s Model Y and Cybertruck production facilities.
They’re both on the outskirts of east Austin, though different parts of east Austin (Telsa’s plant is south, and Samsung’s new Taylor fab way north). Google maps say they’re about 27 miles apart as the crow flies, or 36 minutes apart if you take the 130 toll road.
“Samsung’s giant new Texas fab will be dedicated to making Tesla’s next-generation AI6 chip. The strategic importance of this is hard to overstate,” Elon Musk wrote on X late Sunday night.
Musk continued, “Samsung currently makes AI4. TSMC will make AI5, which just finished design, initially in Taiwan and then Arizona.”
“Samsung agreed to allow Tesla to assist in maximizing manufacturing efficiency,” he noted, adding, “This is a critical point, as I will walk the line personally to accelerate the pace of progress. And the fab is conveniently located not far from my house.”
As to Musk “personally walking the line to accelerate the pace of progress,” presumably in a full bunny suit, I fail to see how that’s going to help anything. Most modern fabs have extremely efficient, streamlined operations that aren’t amenable to improvement via random billionaires walking their floor.
Samsung confirmed that it will produce Tesla’s AI chips as part of a $16.5 billion chipmaking deal, marking a major win for its underperforming foundry division, according to Bloomberg.
A foundry is a fab that manufactures chips for other companies rather than it’s own designs. Samsung has both fabs for its own chips and a foundry business.
The AI6 chip will be produced at Samsung’s chip plant in Taylor, Texas. The new facility was partially funded through the Biden-Harris administration’s CHIPS and Science Act and is focused on manufacturing advanced logic chips for mobile devices, 5G, high-performance computing, and AI applications.
My previous critique of the CHIPS act can be found here.
Tesla’s partner in the deal, Samsung’s Taylor Fab semiconductor location — which broke ground in 2022 and is expected to be fully operational in the City of Taylor come 2026 — aims to increase the production of semiconductor-related initiatives that’ll “power next-generation technologies” including 5G, high-performance computing, and various forms of AI.
The South Korean company, Samsung Technologies, first planted its roots in Texas in 1996, in Austin.
Tesla has multiple locations across the Lone Star State, including its primary manufacturing hub and headquarters near Austin, the “Gigafactory,” which boasts over 10 million square feet in floor space or 2,500 acres.
Snip.
Samsung Electronics announced on Monday it had signed a $16.5 billion contract with a “large global company” — revealed by Musk in the aforementioned X posts, although kept anonymous by Samsung. The contract’s tenure spans from July 24, 2025 to December 31, 2033.
Musk clarified in another X post that he believes the $16.5 billion number is “just the bare minimum,” and that the “actual output” of this collaboration between Samsung and Tesla will be “several times higher.”
There’s been a lot of (somewhat justified) concern over the dependence of American tech companies like Nvidia and Apple on Taiwan-based TSMC to fab their cutting edge sub-10nm chip designs. The problem has been foolishly phrased as “America can’t make chips anymore,” which is false, as American fabs churn out millions of chips every month. The problem is “lack of available domestic sub-10nm wafer starts,” a problem exacerbated by the fact that there are only three companies in the world that have the knowledge and resources to building cutting edge fabs, the cost of which is now pushing $20 billion.
Fortunately for Texas, Samsung is one of those three companies, and together with TSMC’s new fab in Arizona and Intel’s new fab in Ohio, a lot of those capacity constraint problems are being addressed.
