Posts Tagged ‘video’

Richard Hammond And Stirling Moss Discuss Their Brain Injuries

Saturday, December 27th, 2025

Something from the “old news is so exciting” file, but this BBC piece from 2010 in which then Top Gear presenter Richard Hammond interviews racing driver Stirling Moss about his crash on the track in 1962, and subsequent recovery from his serious brain injury, and how his crash and recovery compares to Hammond’s own in a jet-powered car, is quite fascinating.

A few interesting takeaways:

  • Moss was in a coma for a month, and one side of his body was paralyzed for some six months.
  • When he recovered, he tried racing on a track again, but decided to retire because all the split-second decisions he had previously made instantaneously he had to consciously think about.
  • Hammond’s own crash in 2006 was at 288mph, and even though he pulled the parachute release, it failed to deploy. He was in a medically-induced coma for two weeks.
  • Hammond did an interview in December just three months after the accident, and appeared on Top Gear in January some four months after, both times proclaiming himself completely recovered, but later Hammond looked back on those segments and said he clearly wasn’t fully recovered. Indeed, he said each year he would look back at the last, and realize that full recovery was a continuing process.
  • Both men said they reacted to what they thought were their impending deaths not with fear, but just wondering what would come next.
  • Bonus the First: Road To Success interviews Top Gear producer Jim Wiseman, who also produced the Hammond-Moss interview:

    Bonus the Second: Road To Success interviews Top Gear writer Richard Porter:

    Bonus the Third: High Performance interviews Top Gear Head Poobah Andy Wilman, who’s promoting his book Mr Wilman’s Motoring Adventure: Top Gear, Grand Tour, Clarkson and Me (which, weirdly, doesn’t seem to be out in the U.S. yet):

    Bonus the Fourth: Part two of that interview:

    Some takeaways from all that:

  • 70% of what Top Gear would become was already sketched out on pieces of paper Jeremy Clarkson brought to the initial meeting with Wilman (an old mate from school) to relaunch Top Gear.
  • They hated the show’s initial Sunday night BBC2 time-slot (which, weirdly, they had to scare off another car show from using), but it turned out to be a blessing in disguise.
  • Because nobody in BBC management was interested in cars, they were allowed essentially free reign to run the show how they wanted, and to experiment to see what worked and what didn’t.
  • They ended up doing things just because they were interested in them, not because they thought anyone else would be, but this eclectic approach ended up unlocking different audience segments that fueled their global growth.
  • They note that the trial-and-error approach was a huge key to their success, and that if they had aimed for global success from the first, they never would have achieved it.
  • One key was that voiceovers should undercut or counterpoint what was going on on-screen, such as “which went well” rather than “James has broken down again.”
  • They realized early on that failure was a lot more interesting than success. There was a road trip with cheap cars where all three had broken down, and their old school director asked if they should just stop shooting, but Clarkson went “No, keep shooting. This is what it’s about now.”
  • Clarkson’s background was in British tabloid journalism, so he likes to craft his segments ahead of time. By contrast, Hammond is a master of on-the-spot riffing and improvisation.
  • Amazon only did Clarkson’s Farm (and Hammond’s Workshop) as a way to lure them back into doing two more seasons of The Grand Tour. When they heard Clarkson wanted to make the show about farming, they were terrified it was going to be boring. Clarkson said “I don’t blame them.” But it turned out brilliantly because all of the figures in the show were such natural characters that they worked better than any casting call could.
  • Merry Christmas: Stellarscope’s “Silent Night”

    Thursday, December 25th, 2025

    As is the now annual tradition, enjoy Stellarscope’s version of “Silent Night”:

    Merry Christmas!

    Japan Halting Photoresist To China?

    Saturday, December 20th, 2025

    I haven’t been able to verify this yet, but according to China Observer, “Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry may have escalated export controls on November 20-21, adding 12 types of core semiconductor materials and related services to its “End User List,” placing about 110 semiconductor-related entities from mainland China under heightened scrutiny. Mainland China is more than 60% reliant on imports for photoresist, with ArF/EUV almost entirely dependent on Japan and the Netherlands.”

    Every time you pattern a semiconductor wafer via a lithography stepper, you first have to deposit photoresist across the entire surface of the wafer. Once you’ve done that, the lithography pattern projected on the wafer hardens, letting some areas get stripped away during etch to create the interconnect patterns for other processes to fill with circuits for the chips. Getting proper photoresist uniformity across the entire wafer has some technical challenges, but it’s something like ten orders of magnitude less complex than EUV lithography. But getting the formula for EUV photoresist exactly right, and then manufacturing it ultrapure in quantity? Yeah, that’s not exactly something you can do in a high school chemistry lab.

  • “The Japanese have directly pulled out of the entire photoresist business in China. 90% of the photo resist we use is imported, with 60% coming from four Japanese companies. Without them, we can’t operate in the high-end sectors. With Japan’s withdrawal of supplies, domestic semiconductor factories are in chaos. Production capacity is declining and yield rates are crashing. Once production lines stop, they lose millions of yen a day.”
  • “The entire semiconductor industry is suffering massive losses.”
  • “A blogger in one video pointed out that few people know that in China’s semiconductor industry, the true bottleneck isn’t the photolithography machine, but a small bottle of liquid costing 50,000 RMB: photoresist.”
  • Section on China having a hissy fit over Japan’s prime minister Sanae Takaichi stating that Japan would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion (touched on in this LinkSwarm) skipped.
  • “Japan [quietly] and decisively retaliated. According to a report by Chinese media outlet East Money, Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry may have escalated export controls on November 20th to 21st, adding 12 types of core semiconductor materials and related services to its end user list, placing about 110 semiconductor related entities from mainland China under heightened scrutiny.”
  • “Among the most notable measures are those affecting photoresist and photolithography machine after-sales services regarding photoresist.”
  • “Four Japanese companies (JSR Corporation, Shin-Etsu Chemical Company, Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd. and Fujifilm) have suspended deliveries of ArF [Argon-Fluoride laser] immersion and EUV photoresist to mainland Chinese customers while high-end KrF [Krypton-Fluoride laser] products have been significantly delayed.”
  • “Mainland China is more than 60% reliant on imports for photo resist, with ArF UV almost entirely dependent on Japan and the Netherlands.”
  • “Canon and Nikon have informed their Chinese customers that, starting in November, the supply of certain DUV photography machine parts and on-site maintenance services will depend on export licensing conditions. Currently, China has over 1,200 DUV photography machines, 90% of which depend on Canon and Nikon for after sales service.”
  • ” After Canon and Nikon further restrict services, China’s stock of spare parts for photography machines will only last about 3 to 6 months, with photoresist being one of the most critical components.” Well, consumable supply rather than component.
  • “Industry insiders say this means that many Japanese-made photography machines currently in operation will face a supply shortage in the short term and could become scrap metal in the long term.” This is an overstatement, as there’s usually a healthy demand for such machines on the secondary market, either to replace a old machine, or to cannibalize for parts, for research fabs, or for someone trying to put together a trailing-edge fab on the cheap.
  • “Unlike the open ban on 23 types of equipment in 2023, Japan is now adopting a gray customs clearance strategy where rather than announcing an outright embargo. It is using case-by-case approvals, indefinite delays in issuing licenses and cutting off parts and technical support, effectively a supply cut off.”
  • The U.S. has also applied pressure on Japan to implement restrictions.
  • “Photoresist is far more complex than it seems.”
  • “First, the shelf life of high-end photo resist is extremely short, often only 6 months or even less. This means it’s impossible to stockpile and if supply is cut off, production lines will immediately shut down.”
  • “Second, the extreme purity requirements. The formula for photoresist contains dozens of chemical substances with each proportion error not exceeding 1 millionth. The metal impurity limit is as low as 0.001 parts per million, like 1 microgram per kilogram. To put this into perspective, imagine eight Olympic swimming pools full of water. If even a single drop of impurity is mixed in, it must be identified and removed.”
  • “This isn’t just a challenge in terms of the formula. It’s a critical test for the entire chemical purification, filtration, transport, and storage process.”
  • “Third, the ecological [I think they mean ecosystem -LP] barrier. Why are Japanese companies so dominant in the photoresist market? Because over the past 30 years, they have developed their expertise alongside semiconductor giants like TSMC, Intel, and Samsung. Producing photoresist isn’t enough. It must be tested on photography machines worth billions of dollars. The verification cycle takes 2 to 5 years with a high failure rate. Without top semiconductor foundaries to conduct these trial and error processes, your photoresist will never make it out of the laboratory.”
  • “Japan’s dominance in the photoresist market dates back to the 1970s when the country’s economy surged. The government and businesses jointly invested heavily in the semiconductor industry, focusing partially on materials.”
  • “In addition to the high technical barriers and lengthy R&D cycles which take years and require immense investment, Japan holds an overwhelming patent monopoly, 70% of related patents globally. It’s virtually impossible to bypass this barrier.”
  • “Major global chemical companies like the US’s DuPont and Germany’s BASF have less than 10% of the photoresist market share. South Korea has tried but still depends on imports for high-end products. Japanese companies are not only technologically advanced, but their strong industrial chain cooperation in photography machines and silicon wafer production makes it nearly impossible for external competitors to enter.”
  • “According to a 2024 Nikki survey, Japan holds the number one market share in three out of five semiconductor material categories, with photoresist being one of them.”
  • China has tried to develop their photoresist, but when they try them out in fabs, their yield rate crashes. Even if China can steal the right formula, they can’t steal all the intermediary steps necessary to produce the formula.
  • “This issue involves a country’s mastery and accumulation of basic materials and processes, which cannot be solved simply by hiring people to steal technology.”
  • “Japan’s precision manufacturing processes are beyond the reach of China.”
  • For the sake of brevity, I’m skipping over an extensive list of other areas of semiconductor technology where China is heavily dependent on Japan.
  • A whole lot of people freaked out over China’s near-monopoly on rare earth minerals, but China is a lot more dependent on the west for a whole lot of things much higher on the technological food chain.

    Gardner vs. Maryland Heads To Supreme Court

    Thursday, December 18th, 2025

    An interesting Second Amendment case may be making its way to the Supreme Court soon involving reciprocity and post-Bruen state resistance to Second Amendment rights.

  • “The case is Gardner v. Maryland. It is a challenge to Maryland’s concealed carry laws, as it dealt with out of state residents as it was pre-Bruen. It has an amazing fact pattern, one that a plaintiff’s attorney, a petitioning attorney, would love nothing more to have.
  • A lot of people missed it because it was a “pro se petition,” i.e. filed by the person involved rather than a lawyer.
  • “Now it’s sitting on petition to the United States Supreme Court.”
  • “Our good friend Kostas Moros over at the Second Amendment Foundation is geeking out on the video.”
  • “And he also comes to the conclusion, number one, Miss Gardner had gotten completely effed by Maryland law. And number two, you really could not ask for a better fact pattern.”
  • “So he convinces the Second Amendment Foundation to actually do an amicus brief in support of her petition, and also starts using his platforms to publicize this case which then leads to Miss Gardner no longer being a pro se petitioner. She now has counsel. In fact, she has very, very competent counsel representing her.”
  • “But that’s only the beginning of the cool news.”
  • “What once started as a pro se petition by a woman who absolutely got completely hosed by an unconstitutional licensing scheme now has amicus briefs in support of her petition from the following groups.”
  • “There’s an amicus brief from the Second Amendment Foundation, co-authored with the NRA, Second Amendment Law Center, California Rifle and Pistol Association, the Citizens Committee on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus.
  • “But that’s just the beginning of the good news, because guess who else has filed amicus briefs in support of Ava Marie Gardner’s petition? the Cato Institute, the Heller Foundation, 24 attorneys general, spearheaded by the states of Virginia and New Hampshire,” including Texas AG Ken Paxton.
  • “And an amicus brief from Senators Ted Cruz, and all of these other members of the United States Senate.”
  • “Ava Marie Gardner is a lawful and responsible gun owner residing in the state of Virginia. And yes, she has a valid Virginia concealed carry license.”
  • “She’s traveling through Montgomery County, Maryland, specifically on Interstate 270. A road rager intentionally strikes Miss Gardner’s car and forces her off the road. Now, after both cars come to a stop, the other driver gets out of his car and starts rushing towards Miss Gardner’s car.”
  • “She initially screams at him to stop, but that doesn’t seem to work. So, then she displays her firearm and stops the threat. And I want
    you to understand that she merely displayed it, did not discharge it. There was no allegation of her pointing it at it. It was just the display of the firearm.”

  • But then, well, after police arrived, the only person arrested was Miss Gardner.”
  • “For unlawful display of a firearm? Nope. For assault? Nope. No. In fact, the only thing that Miss Gardner was arrested for fell under Maryland Code of Criminal Law Section 4-203A, which says that you cannot have a firearm on your person or in your vehicle unless you are properly licensed by the state of Maryland.”
  • This case goes back and the law that Maryland was using for their concealed carry license at the time made it actually impossible. So that even had Miss Gardner wanted to try to get a Maryland license, she in all likelihood would have never obtained one.”
  • “At the time, in order to get a Maryland concealed carry license,
    one had to one show good and substantial reason. That’s right. they were still operating under the “may issue” standard. So you actually had to prove up a reason as they saw fit for you to actually be able to carry a firearm.”

  • “And then in addition to that too, you had to have 16 hours of instruction which of course was only available in Maryland.”:
  • “And then let us remember that also at the time the state of Maryland offered absolutely no reciprocity whatsoever. So she would have never been able to obtain a Maryland license because she was an out of state resident even if they offered some kind of semblance to an out of state resident.”
  • “So it was basically impossible for Miss Gardner to get a Maryland license.”
  • So Maryland arrested Gardner for not possessing a license that they never would have allowed her to obtain.

    Hopefully the Supreme Court will take up the case and remind deep blue states that Second Amendment rights are not optional.

    Ukraine Sinks Another Russian Sub

    Wednesday, December 17th, 2025

    Back in 2023, Ukraine sunk the Russian Kilo-class submarine Rostov-on-Don. Now Ukraine has sunk another Kilo-class sub, this time in Novorossiysk using an underwater “Sub Sea Baby” drone.

    Novorossiysk is beyond the Kerch Strait Bridge, indicating that Ukraine has quite long-range underwater strike capabilities.

    It seems that none of Russia’s Black Sea fleet is safe from Ukraine’s reach…

    Update: New sat footage suggests the drone seems to have impacted the pier next to the sub, damaging the sub but not sinking it.

    5,000 FPS?

    Sunday, December 14th, 2025

    For a long time, a lot of experts felt that rifle bullets with a velocity of 5,000 feet per second or more were simply unobtainable. The .220 Swift, which hit 4,200 fps on a 40 grain bullet, was thought to be the maximum “regular” cartridge. Even the the infamous .22 Eargesplitten Loudenboomer supposedly only hit 4,600.

    But now Banana Ballistics has evidently done the impossible, using a necked-down 5.56 NATO cartridge paired with an insanely light 12.5 grain solid brass bullet he calls “the Mouse Turd” firing out of a KAK 17-5.56 upper, he’s hit 5,157 FPS.

    But that’s not the top! With what he considers an unsafe load, he hit 5,326.

    And all that out of a 21 inch barrel.

    I would like to calculate the trajectory of the round, but the online ballistics computer I tried tops out at 5,000 fps.

    You may think a bullet that small is useless for anything but varmint hunting, but actually managed to punch through a half inch of mild steel.

    It also tumbles more than a foot through a block of ballistic gel. Being on the receiving end would really ruin your whole day.

    I assume many in the gun community will see a bullet that light out of a barrel that small as nothing more than a novelty, but 5,000+ fps is nothing to sneeze at.

    Though I bet the round is hell on barrel life…

    Dan Crenshaw Threatens To Sue Shawn Ryan

    Saturday, December 13th, 2025

    Podcaster/YouTuber Shawn Ryan is one of those people that lies at the edge of the Mil-blogger/YouTubers I already watch, but never enough to have a tag for him before now. I recognize him from a Joe Rogan interview thumbnail and the disasterous interview Gavin Newsom had with him, but I’m not really familiar with his work. But it definitely got my attention that Texas Congressman Dan Crenshaw is threatening to sue him, a clash that probably has an added intensity since both are ex-Navy SEALS.

  • “On December 9th, 2025, I received a legal demand letter from lawyers representing Congressman Dan Crenshaw. They are threatening to sue me for defamation because of comments I made on my podcast about a message that he sent me.”
  • “They want me to remove content, issue a public apology, and stop talking about him. I’m not going to do any of that.”
  • “What I originally said a while back, I commented on my show about Congressman Crenshaw throwing an extremely expensive party and the fact that he seems to have become quite wealthy during his time in Congress.”
  • “I raised questions about how a congressman making $174,000 a year can afford that kind of a lifestyle. These are legitimate questions. And to be honest, I didn’t even mention Dan Crenshaw’s name in that initial conversation.”
  • “I just brought up the fact that he was having Steve Aoki, a major DJ spin at his party.” I honestly have no idea how much “top DJs” make.
  • “Multiple news outlets have reported on concerns about congressional insider trading and members of Congress, including Congressman Crenshaw, actively trading stocks while having access to non-public information that affects those very stocks. I’m not the only person asking these questions, but apparently I’m the one that got under Dan’s skin.”
  • Crenshaw then sent Ryan an Instagram that Ryan perceived to be threatening:

    Hey Sean, you have the ability to contact your fellow team guy if you’ve got a problem with me or have questions about how I’m getting rich. Some of my boys at six told me about your indirect swipe at me. From the comment you made, it sounds like you have some beliefs that are based on trendy narratives instead of facts.

    Eh, I think Ryan may be over-reacting here. To me the not read more like “What the hell?” than “I’m going to break your kneecaps.”

  • Ryan then plays a clip of Crenshaw talking about how he’ll kill Tucker Carlson if he meets him. Definitely injudicious on Crenshaw’s part, but not an actionable threat.

  • “Now his lawyers are claiming that my interpretation of his message is defamation. They say I accused him of threatening me with assault, which is a crime, and that I need to publicly apologize and remove the content from my show.” And here’s where Crenshaw screwed up. The congressman seems unaware of The Streisand Effect. This video already has three million views, so millions of people who previously unaware of the accusations against him have now heard them.
  • “Here’s my response. No, I’m publishing their full demand letter, along with my lawyer’s response, so that you can read both and decide for yourself whether my interpretation was unreasonable.”
  • “This is about whether a sitting member of Congress can use the threat of an expensive litigation to silence criticism. I asked questions about Congressman Crenshaw’s wealth. Those questions are fair game. He is a public official. He makes decisions that affect all of us. He trades stocks while having access to classified and non-public information.”
  • “If Congressman Crenshaw wants to sue me, he can. My lawyers are ready. And if he does, we’re going to use the discovery process to get answers to all the questions I originally asked, questions about his finances and how he affords the lifestyle he’s living on a congressional salary. I suspect that’s the last thing Dan actually wants.”
  • The upshot of all this is that Crenshaw is going to appear on Ryan’s podcast for an interview.

    I should make it clear that I have no idea whether Crenshaw is crooked or not. His official reports don’t show vast wealth. He has two houses, one valued at $1 million, but that price may just be a side effect of the vast inflation of housing prices in the late Biden Administration. (At one point, my house, which I bought when I was making $46,000 a year in 2004, was theoretically worth around $800,000, but the market has cooled quite a bit since then.) I assume the other house is a rental income property.

    I have heard accusations of Crenshaw accumulating wealth, but they came from 2nd Congressional District primary opponent Steve Toth, who said “While Dan Crenshaw votes with Democrats and threatens conservatives, he’s also somehow gotten rich off his government salary. I had no idea he’s actually a better trader than Warren Buffett. But not quite as good as Hillary Clinton.”

    I sent the following questions to the Toth campaign:

    I want to follow this race for my blog, but I asked two questions that I haven’t received an answer to:

    1. Can you cite examples of Dan Crenshaw benefiting financially from his office?
    2. Can you cite, say, ten bills where Crenshaw’s voting pattern was insufficiently conservative?

    I sent those questions off twice, and have yet to get an answer…but did get put on his campaigns mailing list for block walking notifications.

    There’s certainly some dissatisfaction with Crenshaw among conservative ranks, as exhibited by the nasty “Eyepatch McCain” nickname bestowed on him. But right now, I have to judge the corruption accusations against him “unproven.”

    That said, threatening to sue a podcaster who merely referenced the rumors (and not even by name) is a foolish move that’s going to raise eyebrows.

    Ian McCollum: “Why The M7 And 6.8x51mm Are Bad Ideas”

    Sunday, December 7th, 2025

    I’m not enough of an expert to know whether the new M7 U.S. battle rifle chambered in 6.8x51mm is a good idea or not. But I’m pretty sure Ian McCollum is such an expert, and he says it’s a bad idea:

  • “I have thought from the very beginning that this program was a bad idea.” As evidence by this snippet from 2019.
  • “I really didn’t expect that that the US Army would adopt anything from the NGSW program. We do have a long history of doing weapons development trials, looking at all the options, and adopting nothing new. And that’s what I thought would happen here. Obviously, it didn’t.”
  • “I had a chance to do some shooting with a civilian 68 by 51 or 277 Fury Spear rifle, the civilian version of the M7 several years ago. It was a good rifle. Um, like as a technical thing, it worked well. It handled well, but that doesn’t mean that it’s a good idea for the military to adopt it.”
  • “This video isn’t about the rifle itself. It’s about the doctrine and the concept behind its adoption, which is the part that I think is a really bad idea.”
  • “There were two main justifications that are typically given for the decision to get rid of the intermediate, light recoiling, highc apacity cartridge, the 5.56 [NATO], and replace it with a much higher pressure, much heavier recoiling, much physically larger and physically heavier cartridge, the 68 x 51[mm].”
  • “The first one is when we were in Afghanistan, US troops were often taken under fire by enemy forces from ranges at which they could not effectively respond with their little wimpy 5.56 M4s. And that’s very true. Something like 50% of combat engagements in Afghanistan took place in excess of the practical engagement range of the M4.” Taliban would routinely ambush U.S. troops from higher in the hills “800 or 1,000 meters away.”
  • “And so the justification is often given that if we had some big honking rifle with a magnified optic on it that could reach out to 800 yards, well then, by gosh, we could have taken that dude out.”
  • “And my counter to that is that the world has changed since we were fighting in Afghanistan.”
  • “But if that were happening today, you know what the answer would be? It’s not rearm everybody in the Humvee. It’s you have a box of a couple of little one-way attack drones sitting in the Humvee.”
  • “We’ve all seen the drone footage from Ukraine. Like that’s exactly what would happen if we were in Afghanistan dealing with that situation today. There’s no need for a new small arm to do it.”
  • “And it’s so totally counterproductive to make all the sacrifices of going back to a full power battle rifle in order to be able to do what you can do more effectively with, I don’t know, a couple thousand military procurement one-way attack drone.”
  • “The second justification was armor penetrating capability. Our potential near-peer allies are developing really good, next generation body armor and we need our infantry weapons to be able to defeat that body armor. And I think this is also a mistake, or I think the adoption of the M7 is not the ideal solution to that problem either.”
  • So they needed armor penetration but want to keep the rifle short for usability, and to put a suppressor on it. “This is how we end up with a 13-in barrel that has to achieve 30 something feet per second, which means you have to jack the pressure, the chamber pressure of the cartridge way up in order to get a high, you know, 140 or 130 grain bullet at 3,000 plus FPS.”
  • “Now we have an 80,000 PSI cartridge. And interestingly, looking at Cappy Army’s video, in order to try and mitigate the weight issue, Sigs M71 actually cuts the barrel down even shorter to 11 in. And the SIGR rep that they had in that video was talking about potentially upping chamber pressures to 125,000 PSI…Maybe that’s that’s a typo. Maybe that’s a misspeaking thing.”
  • 80,000 PSI is already really high. Most cartridge pressures top out around 65,000 PSI. At 80,000 PSI, the M7/.277 Fury is already the highest pressure cartridge in the world. 125,000 PSI is simply insanely high.
  • “To me, that’s just mind-bogglingly insane. Like, at that sort of pressures your barrel life is going to be abysmal. Your parts life and everything is going to be abysmal. Like that’s that’s not a really good compromise to achieve higher velocity.”
  • “There are capabilities out there for armor penetration that are much more focused on bullet construction and don’t need to have necessarily the sort of super hyper velocity that you get out of an 80,000 PSI cartridge.”
  • “I recently had the chance to visit CBJ in Sweden. The 65 CBJ cartridge is a pistol caliber cartridge that uses some velocity, but also a lot of material science and projectile design to create a remarkably effective, to many people a shockingly effective, armor penetrating cartridge without having to do a whole lot. And they do it in the chamber pressures of 9 by 19 parabellum.”
  • “If you took the guys from CBJ and you told them, ‘Right, here’s a DoD contract. We need you to come up with an armor-piercing loading for standard 5.56 carbines that will go through and whatever they want to get, whatever they want to be able to defeat with the M7, with the 68 x 51. Give that standard to the guys at CBJ. Tell them they’re going to be doing it out of a 14.5 in barreled M4 carbine with a .223 chamber. And I’m willing to bet that they can they can do it. They’ve got 30 years of expertise developing, designing the small details that make so much difference on a project like this.”
  • That ammo is always going to be expensive, but not as expensive as adopting an entirely new battle rifle.
  • “Every new military weapon out there has some sort of whoopsie, we messed that up and we had to recall a bunch of guns and fix them. Like everyone in history always has it. It’s going to happen on the M7 if it’s not already. It’s going to happen on the M249 or the M250s if it hasn’t already. And all that’s incredibly expensive and I don’t think actually necessary for the goal of being able to defeat significant good armor.”
  • “If you put a tenth that amount of money into development of a 5.56 armor penetrating cartridge, you now have the ability to issue that really fancy expensive ammo when it’s necessary, or standard 5.56 ball and retain all of the benefits that we already have in 5.56 carbines.”
  • Then there’s the issue that most infantry soldiers aren’t really good at hitting anything out in the ranges the M7 is supposed to fill a need for. “And my concern with that is every time the US has gone into a war, they’ve ended up in the aftermath doing some research and trying to figure out what worked and what didn’t.”
  • “What is the effective range of an infantryman with a rifle? The answer that pretty much always comes back is 100 to 300 meters. At 100 meters, infantry are really good at hitting stuff with rifles. At 200 meters, they’re reaching their effective limit. And at 300 meters, it’s really rare that anyone’s doing anything very effective.”
  • Plus NATO studies showed “In 70% of cases, 300 meters was the maximum range that you could actually see a person standing up.”
  • “So when you consider all of the compromises that go into, and the expenses that go into, trying to generate a rifle that can give an infantryman a 600 meter effective reach out and touch that guy range, well, 70% of the time it’s a total waste, because the dude could be standing upright and walking around slowly with no idea he’s under observation, but he’s not under observation, because you can’t actually see someone 300 meters away when you’re prone.”
  • And that’s when someone is standing up. “Go look at footage from Ukraine and tell me how often are guys just standing up straight in the middle of nowhere.”
  • “Compromising a lot of the other capabilities of an infantry small arm in order to attempt to give the infantry a rifle that is effective at 500 meters, in my opinion, is a waste of time and it’s a really bad choice, because most of those infantry cannot make any sort of practical, effective use of that capability at 500 meters. They can do it to 200. The really good ones can do it to 300. And that’s where it falls apart.”
  • “It would be much better to maximize the effectiveness of the rifle within the the operational envelope that we know they’re really good in. Take a rifle and optimize it for one to 200 yards and go with that. Embrace that and then accept that you’re going to need other options for longer shots.”
  • Then take better marksmen and give them sniper rifles optimized for that role. “That’s absolutely well worth it. But what’s not well worth it is trying to turn everyone into the unit into that guy and in the process massively compromising their ability to maintain fire superiority because they run out of ammunition.”
  • And here’s the video that McCollum’s video references:

    In this video, you can clearly hear the Sig rep claim the gun was designed to withstand 125,000 psi. Like McCollum, I have my doubts…

    Ian McCollum And Brandon Herrera Go Deep Gun Geeking

    Monday, December 1st, 2025

    In a self-described “Most Autistic Episode Ever,” Ian McCollum of Forgotten Weapons joins Brandon Herrera, Cody Garrett (AKA Donut Operator) and Eli Cuevas (AKA Eli Doubletap) on their Unsubscribe podcast.

    A whole lot of extremely deep gun-geeking ensues.

    It’s 2.5 hours of wide-ranging firearms discussion, so I’m not going to cover all of it. But topics discussed include gyrojet pistols, the difficulties of finding ammo for rare guns, how the patent process works, how Star Wars turned various real guns (including rare prototypes) into on-screen props, restoring de-milled machine guns, how headspacing works, World War I guns, etc.

    It’s a real buffet of interesting tidbits on a variety of different gun subjects, and I commend it to your attention.

    Edited to Add: Here’s McCollum’s latest Kickstarter, Forged in Snow, about Finnish firearms, which has four days left to go. I won’t be buying it, because it’s a bit pricey and superfluous to my needs, but if it’s your thing, go for it.