2026 is turning out to be a pretty strange year politically.
If you’d asked me last year to guess what issues might be concerning the body politic in a midterm year, I might have answered “inflation, jobs growth, social justice madness, housing costs, and the Iran war.” Not on my bingo card: Women cheering on a mother who confessed to killing her three children and the public uniting against Flock cameras, yet here we are.
Texans overwhelmingly oppose Flock cameras and remain wary of data center construction, according to a new poll that also found an essentially tied U.S. Senate race.
Conducted August 24-26 by Overton Insights/Texas Public Policy Foundation, the poll of 1,167 likely voters shows overwhelming concern about license plate reader cameras, especially those offered by Flock Safety.
Opposition to Flock cameras totaled more than 63 percent, with 51 percent strongly opposing the technology. Only 28 percent of Texans expressed support.
There has been increasing public opposition to the technology over the past few months. Many Texans are raising concerns about Fourth Amendment violations and data privacy because Flock cameras allow law enforcement and private entities to track and retain the movements of drivers not suspected of crimes without a warrant.
David Dunmoyer of the Texas Public Policy Foundation has warned that “Texans do not own their own personal information. Texas has never granted its citizens title to their own data.” Texas lawmakers are expected to evaluate potential safeguards during the upcoming legislative session in January.
I initially didn’t feel strongly about Flock cameras one way or another, since public roads are not a place anyone should have “a reasonable expectation of privacy.” However, the fact that Flock and other AI camera companies have employed underhanded methods to get taxpayer approval for funding them (given the mysterious fervor several public officials have shown toward buying and installing them despite voter resistance, I can only assume that bribery is involved) has changed my mind. Plus Flock’s data sharing and retention policies do bring up Fourth Amendment concerns, and do seem like a sneaky attempt to set up a surveillance system over American citizens, using private companies to carry out activities that would unconstitutional for the federal government to implement directly.
Gov. Greg Abbott has ordered state agencies to pause funding for Flock cameras.
The pause, reportedly issued last Thursday, comes after a Texas agency allegedly spent an estimated $30 million on grants used for the technology.
“To the extent that cities get any funding for those cameras, most of it comes from the federal government,” said Abbott spokesman Andrew Mahaleris on Friday. “To the extent any funding comes from Texas agencies, those agencies are clarifying that those funds cannot be used for Flock cameras.”
Flock contracts have been cancelled or rejected across the nation amid concerns surrounding Fourth Amendment violations, with several Texas localities joining the movement.
Snip.
Flock’s database is free for law enforcement officers to access anytime without a warrant, raising concerns over the potential violations of citizens’ Fourth Amendment rights.
Wylie City Council unanimously voted to not renew its contract with Flock Safety cameras this week.
The 7-0 vote places the city of Wylie in a small group of local governments in Texas opting out of a contract with the automated license plate reader (ALPR) company.
Snip.
Following Pflugerville City Council’s unanimous decision to deactivate the city’s Flock cameras this week, Pflugerville ISD followed suit, notifying parents Wednesday morning of the decision to suspend use of the cameras on district property.
“We understand this technology has raised questions and concerns within our community, and we have listened,” said a Pflugerville ISD spokesperson.
Hood County recently decommissioned its three Flock cameras following significant backlash to concerns of mass surveillance and potential Fourth Amendment violations.
DeFlock Wylie praised the council’s decision, calling it “exactly what residents asked for.” The site quoted Wylie Mayor Matthew Porter as saying, “The protections are just not there and are not required in the terms of the existing contract.”
“This started in January 2026 with one resident reading a contract, and grew into a nonpartisan campaign of neighbors,” wrote DeFlock Wylie.
“By the night of the vote, more than 700 residents had signed the petition, people packed the chamber, and the case was made in Flock’s own words. No lawyers. No budget. No outside money. Just Wylie residents who decided their privacy was worth showing up for.”
The Florida Department of Transportation on Monday revoked all existing permits for automated license plate readers installed by local law enforcement in state highway rights-of-way and said it will stop approving any new installations, citing an “exponential increase” in deployments, reports of misuse, data privacy concerns and “surveillance schemes.”
The Engineering and Operations Memorandum, signed by Will Watts, P.E., FDOT’s chief operating officer and assistant secretary, directs local agencies to remove the devices within 30 days. If they do not, the department said it will take them down. FDOT reserved the right to immediately remove any unit that poses a safety hazard.
Democrat U.S. Senate nominee James Talarico spoke of “dismantling” capitalism while dismissing the future of Texas’ oil and gas industry during a 2020 climate forum, newly resurfaced video shows.
The comments, first reported by CNN, came during a virtual candidate forum hosted by the Austin Sierra Club while Talarico was serving his first term in the Texas House.
During the forum, Talarico was asked what lawmakers could do to address the effects of climate change on minority communities.
“I am so thankful that you asked this question, and also thankful that young activists have really drawn the link between climate change and white supremacy and capitalism in our country,” Talarico said.
“And I think only ending the ways that all three of those oppressive systems work together, are we going to be able to begin the process of dismantling them.”
So much for his camouflage as a moderate.
Earlier in the discussion, Talarico described what he called the “multifaceted threat of a climate crisis, an economic crisis, and a social justice crisis.”
He said a “New Deal effort” would be “the only approach to start to address all three in a thoughtful and meaningful way.”
Talarico also questioned the future of the oil and gas industry, comparing Texas’ position as a national energy leader to dominating an obsolete technology.
“We all know that Texas has been a leader in oil and gas, but in many ways that’s like being the leader in cassette tapes in the 1980s,” Talarico said. “That industry is not gonna last.”
Six years later, Talarico is presenting a markedly different message as he campaigns against Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate.
His campaign told CNN that Talarico is now a “proud capitalist” who supports the oil and gas industry.
So there are basically two possibilities for Talarico. Either he’s a woke-infected socialist hiding his true colors to try to get elected, or he’s Zelig-like chameleon with no core beliefs willing to say or do anything to get elected.
Either should disqualify him in the eyes of Texas voters.
One of those Texas stories that keep bubbling along, and which I have trouble mapping out the dimensions of, is the high voltage line to the Permian Basin story. Texas Scorecard has been out front reporting on the controversy, and my reaction to the headlines has generally been a muted “that’s odd” before clicking on to something else. To summarize, certain state entities want to build extremely high voltage lines from other parts of the state to the oil and gas rich Permian Basin. Transmission line politics being fairly far from my areas of interest and expertise, I haven’t been covering the story beyond the occasional LinkSwarm piece.
When last we checked, an administrative law judges panel went “yeah, you don’t want to do that.” “The judges concluded the utilities [Oncor and the Lower Colorado River Authority Transmission Services Corporation] did not establish that the projects are necessary and failed to comply with notice requirements designed to give affected landowners a chance to participate before the application was filed.”
And here’s were the story flips from “odd” to “sinister.” The Texas Public Utility Commissioners looked at the that decision, and promptly went “Fuck you, we’re doing it anyway.”
Texas’ Public Utility Commissioners voted to move forward on the first of three controversial extra-high-voltage transmission lines. They did this despite calls from landowners and lawmakers to pause the project until after the 2027 legislative session.
The day before, Commission Chairman Thomas Gleeson filed a memo on a segment of the first line. He disagreed with administrative law judges’ finding that electricity delivery company Oncor “failed to notify more than 1,600 impacted landowners of a public meeting.” These are meetings where a transmission service provider presents information about the proposed project and collects feedback from impacted landowners.
“Understanding that folks are not happy with the process,” he said, “I think, on the law, the ALJ was wrong here.”
This is in regards to Oncor’s proposed Dinosaur to Drill Hole 765-kilovolt transmission line. This line would span approximately 390 miles from near Glen Rose to near the Culberson–Reeves county line.
How many 765-kilovolt transmission lines currently exist in Texas? Zero.
It is composed of two segments—the Dinosaur to Longshore and Longshore to Drill Hole lines. Gleeson’s memo addressed the administrative law judges’ Proposal for Decision in the Dinosaur to Longshore line.
Dinosaur to Drill Hole is part of the 765-kV Strategic Transmission Expansion Plan (STEP) Permian, a key part of the Permian Basin Reliability Plan (PBRP). STEP Permian proposes three transmission lines spanning more than 1,200 miles to move electricity from East Texas to the natural gas-rich Permian Basin. A pro-landowner group likened the project “to hauling water to the sea.”
Landowner complaints of not being “meaningfully included” in the process have helped elevate this project to the attention of state officials. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and members of the state House and Senate called for PUCT to deny all pending 765-kV projects until the legislature can reform the approval process in 2027.
American Stewards of Liberty (ASL) and a more than 30-member coalition that includes the Texas Public Policy Foundation requested that PUCT abate all five segments.
In April 2025, the PUC adopted the 765-kV STEP Plan to address projected load growth in the Permian Basin through 2038, approving approximately $5 billion in local
transmission upgrades designed to meet oil and gas demand. Three new 765-kV transmission lines from Central Texas to the Permian Basin region were also approved, with an
estimated cost of $9 billion. The local upgrades will meet more immediate needs due to rising oil and gas demand and existing transmission constraints. The extra capacity from the 765-kV lines will primarily serve projected data center load growth in West Texas and transport excess wind and solar generation from the region to other parts of the ERCOT grid.
And there it is, the real reason for the proposed line: To let Oncor and other big energy utilities sell the power generated by their expensive investments in solar and wind energy to data centers over cheap, reliable new natural gas plants in the same region the data centers are going to be located in.
If Oncor wants to do that, let them pay for their own damn power lines.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, this year’s Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, called on state authorities to pause further action on the plan.
“The Legislature must be afforded the time to review the Plan and its potential impacts so it can then enact additional legislation to provide whatever additional guidance it deems fit,” Paxton wrote.
Snip.
Paxton filed an amicus curiae brief with the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) “in support of abating any decision in furtherance of the Permian Basin Reliability Plan.”
“The Commission has created a Plan that appears to exceed the original intent of H.B. 5066 such that the Commission is no longer aligned with the expectations of the Legislature,” the brief reads.
“As the Legislature is already endeavoring to tackle the growth in electric demand spurred by data centers popping up across the state, now is the ideal time for the Legislature to review the Plan as part of a holistic review of the state’s reliability efforts.”
More:
Republican Texas Railroad Commissioner Wayne Christian and conservative organizations such as the Texas Public Policy Foundation have claimed that the region’s ample natural gas could supply electricity locally, obviating the need for power lines that span the state. Some local officials argue that the plan diminishes city and county authority. Landowners have testified that the lines would affect wildlife and agriculture.
The unseemly haste with which the PUC tossed aside the judicial recommendations suggests that the fix is in, and that little things like widespread opposition won’t be allowed to derail Big Energy and Big Data’s agenda of getting taxpayers to further subsidize their investments.
If PUC continues trying to shove this down taxpayer’s throats despite all the opposition, they should expect some serious lawsuits.
And here’s the King Crimson jam/improve track that gave rise to the title for this post.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton entered the U.S. senate race, there were basically two reputational dings on him. The first was that weird “securities fraud” indictment that always seemed to have been ginned up by political opponents (especially the Joe Straus cabal after Paxton trounced their choice Dan Branch in the 2014 Republican Attorney General primary), and for which the underlying federal indictment for the case had been thrown out years before the state charges were dropped. The second was his wife Angela Paxton filing divorce on “Biblical grounds.” I have no way to determine the truth of a “he said, she said” divorce, and neither of these dings has obscured the fact that Paxton has been an extremely effective, and active, Attorney General who constantly advances conservative causes.
Now Paxton’s Democrat opponent James Talarico has accused him of “getting rich” off his office. There’s only one problem with this theory: math.
James Talarico has a theory that fits on a bumper sticker. Ken Paxton got richer in office; therefore, Ken Paxton is corrupt. The charge is easy to chant and hard to defend. It fails as math, and it does not land on Ken Paxton alone. Angela Paxton’s name sits on the same estate. She taught school, counseled students, and served in the Texas Senate. Before Texans send anyone to Washington, they ought to ask whether a candidate who cannot read a balance sheet is qualified to write a budget.
Net worth can rise for any number of lawful reasons. Compound returns will do it. So will leveraged real estate, a long-held business stake, or a pension earned over decades. Corruption is one possible cause among those, and it is the cause that has to be shown. Growth by itself does not show it. In the Paxtons’ case, the record points the other way.
Ken Paxton did not appear in 2015 as a blank slate on a government paycheck. He graduated from the University of Virginia School of Law in 1991, spent four years at Strasburger & Price in Dallas, then seven years as in-house counsel at JCPenney. He ran his own McKinney practice for about thirteen years and owned a multiple-branch title company besides, while serving in a legislature that pays $7,200 a year because it expects members to keep real jobs. His Texas ethics filing for 2014, the year before he became attorney general, lists an active law firm, a title company, publicly traded stock, roughly two dozen mutual funds, real estate, and a long roster of private partnership interests. A personal financial statement supplied to a bank in 2015 put the couple’s net worth at about $5.4 million, with roughly 40 percent already in a blind trust. That is the starting line. An attack that starts the clock at zero is not an audit.
The best current estimate of the couple’s joint net worth, drawn from Forbes’s asset-by-asset work and the federal disclosure, is about $13 million after roughly $4.7 million in mortgage debt. Growing from $5.4 million in 2015 to $13 million in 2026 is a compound annual rate of 8.3 percent. Over the same years, the S&P 500 with dividends reinvested returned about 13.4 percent a year, a cumulative gain of roughly 299 percent. Five point four million left in an index fund in 2015 would be more than $21 million now. The Paxtons hold $13 million. Call that corruption if you like. It is corruption that lagged a Vanguard 401K account by $8 million.
The holdings look like what those returns imply. The one large score is a roughly $300,000 investment made around 2004 in a McKinney firm that became WatchGuard Video, the police dash-camera maker. Motorola bought the company in 2019, and the stake produced a reported $2.2 million gain. The position appears in Paxton’s state filings a decade before the sale and moved into the blind trust in 2015. Around it sit leveraged real estate in several states, about $10 million in gross revenue against $4.7 million in mortgages, cell-tower leases that throw off modest rent, a large book of mutual funds, and a state pension from more than two decades of service. Forbes, no house organ of the right, called the fortune a leveraged real estate business, a diversified fund portfolio, and a pension. There is no mystery cash in that inventory.
Then there is the accuser. James Talarico is 37. Public records do not show a company he founded, a payroll he met, or a portfolio he steered through a losing year. His personal financial disclosure lists one checking account, held jointly with his mother, a fact his campaign has declined to explain.
He’s the perfect candidate for today’s Democrats.
As the headline for this piece puts it, “If the Paxtons Are Corrupt, They Are Remarkably Bad at It.”
Remember back when Democrats swore up and down that ObamaCare was going to solve all our health care problems? That prices were going to fall and we could all keep our doctors? Those were lies meant to let them cartelize medicine and generate record profits for Big Medicine. One effect: A huge jump in fraud.
Taxpayers spent $65 billion on health insurance premiums for people who either didn’t exist or didn’t qualify for benefits in two federal programs in 2024, according to an Aug. 26 report from Paragon Health Institute.
Expanded Medicaid and Obamacare, the signature programs of the Affordable Care Act, improperly enrolled a combined 14.3 million people that year, researchers concluded.
Expanded Medicaid allows states to enroll people making up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, versus up to 100 percent for traditional Medicaid. That limit was about $35,600 for a family of three in 2024.
Obamacare was open to people earning up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level at that time, about $103,000 for a family of three.
Both programs are administered through the Affordable Care Act Marketplace, with coverage provided by commercial insurance companies.
As Lawrence Wilson details below, via The Epoch Times, researchers estimate that about 34 percent of all Marketplace enrollees in 2024 were either fraudulent, duplicates, or simply didn’t meet the benefit criteria.
And the number went up the next year, researchers said.
“Improper exchange enrollment increased by more than 26 percent from 2024 to 2025 – up to an estimated 6.5 million enrollees,” the report stated.
Researchers studied federal data from surveys, program enrollment, and spending and concluded that more than 9 million Medicaid expansion enrollees in 2024 probably didn’t qualify for the benefit.
Those were likely people whose income was over the limit, did not meet citizenship, immigration, or residency requirements, or should have been enrolled in traditional Medicaid.
It seems that getting illegal aliens on every possible welfare state program has been a driving goal of the Democrat Party for quite some time now. From Somali Lering Centers to fake hospices, it seems like an awful lot of the modern welfare state was designed to be defrauded, with significant amounts of that fraud ending up in Democrat pockets.
And then California passes the Stop Nick Shirley Act, and you realize that welfare state fraud isn’t baked in, it was designed in to transfer money from taxpayers to leftist grandees and NGOs.
The fraud wasn’t a side effect, it was the entire point of creating the program.
Israel-Turkey relations have run hot and cold under Turkey’s jihadist “president for life” Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and right now they’re enjoying another cold spell. Turkey said it wanted an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu over Israel stopping another stupid “Gaza Flotilla” (which, like previous incarnations, were designed to deliver headlines and weapons rather than aid). Israel hit an airbase in Syria where Turkey was building up supplies to station troops. But Israel also found a non-kinetic way to hit back at Turkey as well: Selling air defense systems to Greece.
Amid Turkey’s growing threat to the region, Israel is helping Greece build a missile and drone defense system. The multi-billion-dollar deal, set to be signed early next week, seeks to create a multi-layered air defense shield protecting the Mediterranean nation.
“Greece and Israel are expected to sign agreements on Monday in Tel Aviv on the “Achilles’ Shield” programme, totaling €3 billion [$3.6 billion],” the Greek business daily Naftemporiki reported Friday.
Achilles’ Shield, named after the mythological Greek hero, will be jointly built by Israeli and Greek defense manufacturers. According to the newspaper, “the new anti-aircraft, anti-ballistic and counter-drone system will be operational within 35 months.”
“It will comprise a range of weapons systems creating overlapping “domes” over the entire Greek territory, supported by an integrated command-and-control system and involving the participation of Greece’s defense industry,” the daily added.
The project is already in an advanced stage. Israel has tested the components of the new system on its Iron Dome platform. “The system is designed to combine existing Greek assets, including Patriot air defense systems and drones already deployed at military facilities on islands and the mainland, with Israeli-made air defense platforms,” the English edition of Greek newspaper Kathimerini reported Friday. “Officials say the systems incorporated into Achilles’ Shield have already been integrated into Israel’s Iron Dome architecture and tested against aerial attacks.”
The conflict between Greeks and Turks is much, much older than the Turkish state itself, stretching back not only to the early days of the Ottoman Empire, but to the Byzantine Empire (more Hellenic than Roman, especially at its height), which controlled almost all of the land occupied by modern Turkey. But it was the Turkish Seljuk Empire’s conquest of Anatolia that set up Greeks and Turks for a millennium of on-again, off-again conflict.
There’s little love lost between the Turks and the Greeks (or, indeed, Turks and any of their neighbors)…
…so Israel selling Greece advanced anti-air and anti-drone systems to their ancient enemies is an especially big “Fuck You” to Ankara, especially since F-35 sales to Turkey are still on hold, and the mainstay of their air force are non-stealthy F-16s. Its also fills a huge need for Greece, given the difficulty of securing airspace over its wide array of Aegean islands, one of which, Samos, lies all of a mile off the Turkish mainland across the Mycale Strait.
Historically, Israel enjoyed better relations with Turkey and Iran (both non-Arab nations) than any other Muslim nations. Khomeini’s revolution in 1979 ended that with Iran, and Erdogan’s rise has similarly wrecked relations with Turkey (though, unlike in Iran, not to the point of armed conflict). Ankara obviously desires to become a regional power, a goal quite possible due to the collapse of Assad in Syria and conflicts that have weakened Iran and Russia.
But butting heads with Israel, a country with a far more technologically advanced military than its own, is not a recipe for success.
Huge Supreme Court win, Ukraine switches from Wildberries to Ozon warehouses, yes, DSA are damn dirty commies, more Second Amendment progress, Ted Cruz’s book on Clarence Thomas is out, Aussie gets 15 years for shooting a carnival air gun, remembering Dolly, and the NFL finally takes the Pro-Bowl to a farm in the country.
The Supreme Court just handed President Trump a massive victory in the fight to secure America’s elections. The justices cleared the way for his executive order restricting mail-in voting to move forward, and after months of Democrat officials trying to bury the policy in court, the administration finally has room to breathe.
This is a big deal.
The SAVE America Act is still stalled in the Senate, blocked by Democrats who aren’t even hiding the fact they have zero interest in verifying that voters are who they say they are. Trump’s executive order just got a green light from the nation’s highest court anyway. Election integrity doesn’t have to die in the legislative graveyard to make progress.
Trump signed the executive order, called “Ensuring Citizenship Verification And Integrity In Federal Elections,” in March 2026. It directs his administration to build lists of eligible voters and orders the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists. The Postal Service laid out its implementation plan last week, but the clock is ticking. Some states start sending mail ballots in just a few weeks, leaving the administration little time to get this right before the midterms. More court challenges remain possible.
The victory is real, but it’s not the finish line.
Mail balloting has been a target of Trump’s for years, and for good reason. The Heritage Foundation has long argued that mail-in ballots are more susceptible to fraud, coercion, and chain-of-custody problems than in-person voting. Anyone who lived through the 2020 presidential election, one of the most disputed elections in history, watched that vulnerability play out in real time.
It’s official: California just criminalized publicly exposing fraud.
our tax dollars are paying for fraud, and if someone like Nick Shirley exposes this fraud he, not the fraudster, could get in trouble.
More from Nick:
These politicians need the fraud to continue and they sadly use immigrants to do so often. They fund nonprofits and NGOs with hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars every year for immigration services, including free healthcare, and have now made ‘immigration support service providers’ essentially a protected class in California.
For example, if I film a hospice or a ‘learning center’ with no patients receiving millions through Medicaid and the owner gives me a paper saying I cannot publish the video, I cannot publish it. If I publish it to expose them and they claim it caused them ‘fear’ or a third party threatens them, I face a minimum $4,000 civil fine plus the legal fees of the individual or group suing me.
This bill was created by the Attorney General’s wife and co-sponsored by CHIRLA, a nonprofit that has received over $80,000,000 in taxpayer dollars for ‘immigrant support services.’ Do you understand how this works yet? When the fraud is exposed, they create new laws to protect the fraudsters and penalize those who expose it.
By signing this bill, the Governor and California politicians expose themselves as the corrupt politicians they are. This is not the end; the fight has just begun. More to come soon; this is far from over.
An unconstitutional prior restraint First Amendment violation that will be struck down instantly the first time California tries to enforce it.
If it weren’t for voter fraud, welfare state fraud, crazy trannies, violent criminals and pandering to radical Islamic anti-Semites, the Democrat Party wouldn’t have any business model at all…
“Our goal is Communism,” David Jenkins, a member of DSA’s National Political Committee, said in 2023.
DSA member Cea Weaver is New York City’s tenant tsarina. She posted via X in December 2017, “Elect more communists.” The next year, she demanded: “Seize private property.”
Weaver’s boss is Mayor Zohran Mamdani. In his Jan. 1 inaugural address, he stated: “I was elected as a democratic socialist, and I will govern as a democratic socialist.” He told a DSA Zoom call in 2021: The “end goal” should be “seizing the means of production.” Mamdani also said, “The abolition of private property … is preferable to what is going on right now.” These comments loudly echo Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ cornerstone collectivist text “The Communist Manifesto.”
The magnificently named Darializa Avila Chevalier rode Mamdani’s endorsement all the way to the Democrat nomination for New York’s 13th Congressional District.
“I’m a democratic socialist,” she boasted June 29 on MS Now. She also wants to “seize the means of production,” as she advised in a not-quite-deleted September 2019 X post. She confessed that December: “I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag.” In April 2020, she wrote: “Most of the theory I have read is communism but the pyromania associated with anarchism is very intriguing to me.” The Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine preserved 3,657 such messages that Chevalier thought she had erased.
For months, the assumption that the Strait of Hormuz was Tehran’s ultimate card dominated commentary on the war.
As a narrow waterway through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and a substantial share of liquefied natural gas had historically passed, it appeared to be a chokepoint Iran could close or severely disrupt at will. It did not need to destroy every tanker. Hitting a small percentage with drones, cruise missiles, speedboats, or mines would spike insurance rates, deter crews and companies, and effectively shut the strait without continuous physical control.
This idea was not new for 2026. It had long been a feature of the Iranian strategic posture, treated as both a military instrument and a political myth-proof that even under pressure Tehran retained a decisive lever over the global energy system. Parts of the Western media and independent analysts amplified the same narrative.
Relying on incomplete open-source shipping data, especially once vessels began sailing dark, many concluded that the United States had been caught unprepared and lacked a realistic path to reopen the waterway. Hormuz, they argued, was effectively closed or closable at Iran’s discretion. That framing was powerful, but also incomplete.
The assumption that Iran’s detection and targeting system could not be dismantled without dramatic escalation proved wrong. Under the U.S. Central Command, also known as CENTCOM, and with significant involvement from the Fifth Fleet and Air Force components, the United States ran a sustained effort to degrade the sensors Iran needed to find and hit ships.
Iran relied on mobile truck-mounted radars, drones, cruise missiles, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) speedboats, and naval mines. Inside the narrow strait, ships move in relatively predictable lanes. Iran combined active radars with passive electro-optical and infrared cameras on elevated terrain and islands such as Qeshm, Larak, and Abu Musa.
Mobile radars would radiate briefly to locate shipping, then shut down and move before anti-radiation missiles could arrive. Once a ship’s approximate position was known, strike systems could be sent to search.
The vulnerability was that every radar emission could be detected. American aircraft responded systematically with anti-radiation missiles while visual and intelligence efforts located the passive sensors. This was the core of what some involved called “draining the swamp.”
Iran had redundancy, but the number of sensors was finite. Hundreds of precision strikes gradually reduced Iran’s ability to see traffic in the strait. As the detection layer thinned, the effectiveness of the strike systems declined with it.
Parallel efforts neutralized mines with unmanned vessels and declared the southern lane near Oman largely clear. Convoys moved under escort, often at night with the automated information system (AIS) off. Arleigh Burke-class destroyers with Aegis radars and standard missile (SM)-family interceptors formed the backbone; drones and Apache helicopters armed with laser-guided rockets provided additional cover. American ships also engaged IRGC speedboats that closed on the convoys.
On the commercial side, the United States addressed insurance barriers. In early March, President Donald Trump directed the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) to provide political risk insurance and guarantees for maritime trade.
The DFC, working with the Treasury and CENTCOM, established a revolving reinsurance facility of roughly $20 billion-later expanded with private partners including Chubb-focused on hull, machinery, and cargo cover. Early uptake was limited. As Iranian success rates fell, more vessels joined.
Results have been significant. CENTCOM has reported assisting well over a thousand commercial vessels and moving hundreds of millions of barrels since the spring. Independent trackers often showed lower numbers because much of the traffic sailed dark. Pre-war throughput was 20 million to 21 million barrels per day.
Flows through Hormuz remain below that, but combined with the Abu Dhabi-Fujairah pipeline and Saudi Arabia’s pipeline to Yanbu in the Red Sea, volumes recovered enough to keep oil prices in the $85 to $95 range-elevated, but far from the predicted catastrophe.
Followup: “Satellite Imagery of Multiple Ozon Warehouses Destroyed by Ukraine.”
“Big Blast as Drone Storage is Hit By Drone & Project 05060 Patrol Boat Destroyed in Crimea.”
“Ukraine Destroys Rare Su-33 (First Destroyed), MiG-29 and Orion Attack Drone At Anapa Airport.” This was just the other side of the Kerch Straight Bridge. The Su-33 is normally a carrier based aircraft, but since Russia’s only aircraft carrier has been out of service since 2017, they’re doing much desk landing these days.
The surprise visit by the director of the Central Intelligence Agency to Moscow this week was to deliver a warning to Russia not to attack NATO countries, according to people briefed on the visit.
The trip was spy-agency chief John Ratcliffe’s first publicly known visit to the Russian capital. It followed new U.S. intelligence assessments, reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal, that Russian President Vladimir Putin could try to test the resolve of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization with a limited assault on an allied country in the next few years.
U.S. officials are concerned that Putin, squeezed in Ukraine and under pressure at home, could launch an assault ranging from a cyberattack to a small-scale land incursion, likely on a Baltic nation, the Journal reported.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Justice conceded that Americans are allowed to carry in Postal Service buildings.
Snip.
On August 18, a federal judge ruled against Biden’s “ghost gun” ban, saying it violates multiple parts of the Constitution….Judge Reed O’Connor ruled Biden’s “Ghost Gun” rule violates the 2nd and 5th Amendments,
Decision by decision, the Second Amendment is being upheld and gun rights expanded.
More progress: “CDC restores info showing how many good guys with guns stop bad guys after Biden removed it.”
Concerning: “Maryland felony cases against Zizian trans death cult members abruptly suspended. After 18 months of prosecution, Maryland abruptly put its cases against three Zizian trans cult members on indefinite hold. Officials have not publicly explained why.”
The cases against cult leader Jack “Ziz” LaSota and subordinates Michelle “Jamie” “Alex” Zajko and Daniel “Hastur” Blank were made inactive on Aug. 14; All scheduled future trial dates were canceled.
LaSota, Zajko and Blank were arrested together following a national manhunt on Feb. 16, 2025 in rural western Maryland. They were found with a cache of weapons in their two box trucks. They had spent years moving around the country as members of the Zizians, a radical transgender cult who has been linked to at least eight violent deaths.
The three initially faced only misdemeanor trespassing, firearms and obstruction charges after an elderly Frostburg-area property owner reported that they had arrived in box trucks and asked to camp on his property.
Authorities later added charges involving the alleged illegal possession and carrying of concealed and loaded firearms.
LaSota, a biological male who identifies as a woman and uses the name “Ziz,” is the founder and ideological leader of the Zizians. The group is made up of transgender vegan extremists, several of whom have elite educational backgrounds in science and mathematics. Members embraced an esoteric ideology combining leftist transgender politics, anarchism, rationalism and veganism.
Snip.
Though the state charges have been suspended, LaSota is being held on a federal detainer request on a federal indictment of being a fugitive from justice in possession of firearms and ammunition. On Tuesday, he was transferred into federal custody at the Federal Detention Center in Philadelphia.
Zajko, meanwhile, is awaiting extradition to Pennsylvania. She was charged in June with murdering her adoptive parents, Richard and Rita Zajko, on New Year’s Eve 2022. The case had gone cold for years before the surprise announcement by prosecutors in Delaware County, Pennsylvania.
Authorities allege Zajko traveled from Vermont to her childhood home in Chester Heights on the night of her 30th birthday and participated in the execution-style killings.
Bad news for justice in Colorado: “Former Colorado Bureau of Investigation DNA analyst Yvonne Missy Woods pleaded guilty to four felonies — cybercrime, perjury, attempting to influence a public official, and forgery, after facing 102 felony charges tied to misconduct in 58 cases dating back to 2008. Woods worked at CBI for 29 years, from January 1994 to November 2023, and was qualified as an expert witness more than 500 times. A routine audit in late 2023 uncovered anomalies in her work; an internal investigation found she purposefully deleted DNA data to skip required testing steps. Retesting of roughly 3,000 affected cases cost the state an estimated $11 million. Among the high-profile cases she handled was the 2003 Kobe Bryant sexual assault investigation. ”
“ICE Arrests 1,328 Illegal Aliens in DC, Virginia, Maryland in 14 Days. Of those arrested, almost 400 illegal immigrants had criminal convictions or pending criminal charges, including a Salvadoran national wanted in Richmond, Virginia, on a murder warrant.”
“Other crimes included rape, sexual assault, kidnapping, DUI, robbery and attempted murder.” Also: “They also arrested members of MS-13, 18th Street Gang, and Tren de Aragua gangs.” MS-13 and Tren de Aragua we’ve covered here before. According to Wikipedia, “The 18th Street Gang, also known as Eighteen St, Barrio 18, Mara 18, or simply 18 in North America, is a multi-ethnic (largely Mexican and Central American), street gang from Los Angeles, California. It is one of the largest street gangs in Los Angeles, with 30,000–50,000 members between the United States, Mexico, and Central America.” Evidently they’re enemies with MS-13.
“Lottery Boss Appears in Court over $95 Million Scandal. Former Texas Lottery Executive Director Gary Grief faces a first-degree felony charge of abuse of official capacity tied to the controversial 2023 jackpot.”
Former Texas Lottery Executive Director Gary Grief appeared in a Travis County courtroom Friday morning as the criminal case stemming from the controversial 2023 Lotto Texas jackpot moves forward.
Grief appeared alongside his attorney before District Judge Dayna Blazey in the 167th District Court. Prosecutors and attorneys representing the entity formerly known as the Texas Lottery Commission were also present.
Court records show Grief waived formal magistration Friday. Another hearing concerning his personal-recognizance bond was set for October 16.
Shortly after Friday’s proceedings, Travis County District Attorney José Garza formally announced that a grand jury had indicted both Grief and the now-defunct Texas Lottery Commission for abuse of official capacity.
The indictments were handed down April 21.
According to Garza’s office, the charges stem from the April 22, 2023, Lotto Texas drawing and allege that the commission, along with high-level management officials Ed Rogers and Clay Kidd, intentionally and knowingly misused government resources.
The DA’s office alleges the conduct was authorized by Grief, who was serving as the commission’s executive director at the time.
The indictment concerns the drawing in which a New Jersey-based lottery purchasing operation acquired nearly every possible number combination and won a $95 million jackpot.
Grief faces a first-degree felony charge of abuse of official capacity involving $300,000 or more.
The whole affair stinks to high heaven, and I have to think at least some Lotto Commission employees were in on it.
“Judges Recommend Regulators Reject Proposed 765-kV Line. The Public Utility Commission must now decide whether to accept the judges’ recommendation to reject the proposed multibillion-dollar transmission line projects.” “The judges concluded the utilities [Oncor and the Lower Colorado River Authority Transmission Services Corporation] did not establish that the projects are necessary and failed to comply with notice requirements designed to give affected landowners a chance to participate before the application was filed.”
The plot thickens. “Iowa Attorney General Says She’s Taking California to the Supreme Court Over Paramount-Warner Bros.”
Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird wrote in an op-ed for The Daily Wire that she is suing California for leading the charge in the lawsuit against the Paramount–Warner Bros. merger.
“California is once again trying to be the country’s regulator. And once again California is defying common sense to raise costs around the country,” Bird wrote. “That makes this a dispute between states, and the Constitution says those can only be heard in the U.S. Supreme Court.”
“Australian man faces 15 years in prison for using toy gun to win carnival prize for daughter.” He was an ex-felony prohibited from using guns, but getting busted for a carnival air rifle seems way, way excessive.
How Simon Whistler runs his YouTube channels. He outsources everything except direction and presentation, expands his winners and ruthlessly culls his losers. It’s smart business, but largely antithetical to what I watch YouTube for. (Previously.)
Weirdly enough, the animated film Lesbian Space Princess seems to be hated by everyone. See, a film with that title could be highly profitable in porn…
Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Wednesday that his office has secured a proposed settlement worth more than $1 billion with Meta Platforms Inc. that would require the company to adopt new safety features for children using its social media platforms.
Paxton said the agreement would direct more than $1 billion to the State of Texas for youth mental health services, crisis resources, digital literacy programs, after-school initiatives and grants for Texas schools. The settlement would also impose new platform requirements involving age assurance, teen screen-time limits, school-hour notifications, public reactions, and nighttime access.
“This is a historic settlement and a major win for the safety of Texas children,” Paxton said in a statement. “Not only will Meta pay over $1 billion to Texas, but the company will also implement significant new safety features to better protect children’s precious minds and well-being on its platforms.”
Under the announced terms, Meta would be required to use stricter age-assurance measures and impose a default two-hour daily limit for teen users. Teens could turn off the limit only with a parent’s permission.
Push notifications would be muted by default during school hours from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m., except for direct messages and account-security or safety alerts. Likes and reactions would also be hidden by default, a feature the attorney general’s office said is intended to reduce social comparison among young users.
The company would additionally create a nighttime-access setting designed to limit notifications and certain other features for children between midnight and 6 a.m. Meta would continue to restrict age-inappropriate content and provide parental-supervision tools, according to Paxton’s office.
The announcement comes as Meta faces ongoing scrutiny and litigation from states alleging that its Facebook and Instagram platforms harmed children by encouraging compulsive use. Meta has denied claims that it knowingly designed its platforms to addict young users.
A lot of these seem like pretty common sense features all parents would want. Why didn’t Facebook implement them long ago? With a market cap of 1.45 trillion dollars, I think they can afford it. Of course, that would get in the way of Facebook sucking up every last drop of user data, no matter the cost.
One billion dollars is a lot of money, but it’s still a drop in the bucket to Meta, and I seriously doubt it will discourage them from beta testing Torment Nexus 2.0 on the next batch of teenage lab subjects.
A high-speed rail line between Austin and San Antonio would cost about $13.5 billion to build, according to a recent feasibility study commissioned by Travis County Commissioners Court.
The study conducted by HNTB Corporation assessed the potential of a high-speed rail route between Austin-Bergstrom International Airport and the Amtrak station in San Antonio along State Highway 130 and Interstate 10.
Running from an airport in one city to an Amtrak station in another? Who the hell is this line for, tourists who want to save money traveling to San Antonio? It certainly doesn’t seem geared for the benefit of actual Travis County residents, especially now that the theoretical Project Connect light rail link to Bergstrom has been cancelled.
Also, if you’re going 130 to I-10 to San Antonio, you’re missing the bigger I-35 cities like Kyle, San Marcos and New Braunfels in favor of smaller cities Lockhart and Seguin. I guess the plan is to keep it high speed because almost no one will want to visit the smaller bergs on the train line.
The proposed route would run at about 125 miles per hour with a travel time of about an hour between the two cities.
Sure it would. Pretty much no U.S. “high speed rail” services hit their theoretical maximum because they stop too often and the track’s not straight enough to maintain top speed for long.
Travis County approved $125,000 to fund the feasibility study in October 2025.
The proposed 89-mile route presents challenges because of the many cross-street overpasses and an existing right-of-way that has minimal space to accommodate the rail route. These challenges contribute to the $13.5 billion price tag by requiring much of the route to be elevated.
The high-speed rail would also cost $190 million to operate and maintain annually, according to the report.
That works out to some $520,000 a day in ongoing operating costs paid by the taxpayers.
The feasibility study did not include ridership or fare estimates for the proposed high-speed rail line.
Acela serves just under 9,000 passengers a day. Even if the proposed Austin-San Antonio leg got that many (it won’t; even a thousand a day is probably too many), that results in a cost of over $4,000 per passenger per day over the first year in fixed costs alone. At 1,000 riders, it’s more like $36,000 a passenger per day the first year. For that price you could buy every rider their own Honda Civic, and save the taxpayer gobs of money over the other 364 days of the year (and 15-20 years more to boot). Including the ongoing costs adds a $520 taxpayer subsidy per rider per day.
The actual Austin Amtrak ridership in 2025 was 47,030. Not per day. Not per week. Not per month. That’s the total yearly ridership to all destinations.
Maybe my 1,000 estimate is way too optimistic.
There’s also this: “A separate TxDOT study found expanded passenger service on existing tracks could cost as little as $800 million.” Even that is too much for how much such a line would actually be used. Intercity passenger rail is a money loser everywhere it’s run, and only sorta, kinda works in the northeast because of a much higher population density. Even there it’s heavily subsidized, and even the fastest train, Amtrak’s Acela, only saves just over an hour over a car trip between D.C. and New York City.
Leftists everywhere love rail because it’s an endless source of graft in the planning and building stages, and a superior means of surveilling and controlling the population. How are you supposed to inflict socialism on the peasants if they can just climb in their car and drive away?
All this is a boondoggle in search of a problem, as low cost mass transit between Austin and San Antonio already exists in the form of buses, with fares starting at as little as $11. But that’s not a desirable form of transportation for liberal elites, because riding a bus doesn’t show how smugly superior they are over ordinary people. Plus they have to rub shoulders with both the peasants they disdain and the illegal aliens they’ve inflicted on them.
This proposed train project makes zero economic sense, benefits very few Austinites, costs taxpayers dearly, will be an endless source of graft, and, like California’s Train to Nowhere, will never actually be built.
For all those reasons, expect Austin Democrats to keep pushing for it.
Here’s an article I found quite surprising: “U.S. Muslim Brotherhood authorizes $140M annually to help Muslims take control of American government.”
Welp, the Muslim Brotherhood is alive and well, and its U.S. branch is putting its money where its mouth is.
BREAKING: The Shariah-ruling arm of the US Muslim Brotherhood has issued a fatwah unlocking an estimated $140 million a year in tithing (zakat) from American Muslims to finance the campaigns of Muslim leaders for public office including the House & Senatehttps://t.co/wqnPCYRiCQ
Abdul El-Sayed racked up at least $315,000 from Muslim Brotherhood-tied sources. Coincidentally, he also says Israel is “evil…”
Islamic organizers are advancing a nationwide plan to back Muslim and other Islamic-friendly candidates with financing from a potential political war chest of more than $140 million a year in mosque and other donations from the swelling Muslim-American community.
Earlier this year, the Qadhi-led Fiqh Council of North America issued a legal ruling (fatwa) in coordination with the Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America that for the first time unlocks Muslim-American tithing and charitable giving, known as ‘zakat,’ for political use: ‘[G]iving one’s zakat for influencing political causes is warranted.’ The stated goal is to, broadly, ’empower’ Muslim communities in America, but more specifically, to fund the campaigns of politicians who oppose Israel and support policies such as criminalizing criticism of the Prophet Muhammad and Islam in general.
Qadhi is sympathetic to such censorship: ‘For us Muslims, an infinitely more amount of respect should be shown to our religious symbols and especially to our prophet.’
The reason all this strikes me as odd is because I was under the impression that the Muslim Brotherhood (AKA the Ikhwan) was a designated terrorist organization, and it is, but not in the U.S.
Today, as a first step in support of President Trump’s commitment to eliminate the capabilities and operations of Muslim Brotherhood chapters that pose a threat to the United States as described in Executive Order 14362, the United States is imposing terrorist designations against the Lebanese, Jordanian, and Egyptian chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Department of State is designating the Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT), and the group’s leader Muhammad Fawzi Taqqosh as an SDGT. Concurrently, the Department of the Treasury is designating the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood as SDGTs for providing material support to Hamas.
Texas has declared the Muslim Brotherhood (and CAIR) as terrorist organizations as well, as did Florida. And numerous nations (Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, UAE, Kenya, and even Russia) have declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization.
Yet, somehow, the United States government under Donald Trump has not done so. Given the disasterous reign of Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi in Egypt, where he tried to turn the nation into a one-party Islamic dictatorship, you would think America’s government would want to avoid the same mistake over here.
The First Amendment prevents government from barring people for running for office based on their religion or beliefs, no matter how criminally stupid. But nothing requires us to let a terrorist organization raise money to overthrow the Constitution and replace it with an Islamic dictatorship.
The Trump 47 administration should correct this oversight.
