In a modern world deeply interconnected by global trade, it’s pretty rare that a country will just up and seize a company belonging to another country, but that’s just what The Netherlands did.
The Dutch government has taken control of Nexperia, a Chinese-owned chipmaker based in the Netherlands, in a bid to safeguard the European supply of semiconductors for cars and other electronic goods and protect Europe’s economic security.
The Hague said it took the decision due to “serious governance shortcomings” and to prevent the chips from becoming unavailable in an emergency.
Nexperia’s owner Wingtech said on Monday that it would take actions to protect its rights and would seek government support.
The development threatens to raise tensions between the European Union and China, which have increased in recent months over trade and Beijing’s relationship with Russia.
In December 2024, the US government placed Wingtech on its so-called “entity list”, identifying the company as a national security concern.
Under the regulations, US companies are barred from exporting American-made goods to businesses on the list unless they have special approval.
In the UK, Nexperia was forced to sell its silicon chip plant in Newport, after MPs and ministers expressed national security concerns. It currently owns a UK facility in Stockport.
Nexperia was spun off from NXP, which was spun off from Philips. They’re integrated device manufacturers, but not anywhere near the high-end devices fabbed by TSMC, Intel or Samsung. Quite the opposite. Nexperia specializes in discretes, the cheap, mass-produced individual electronic components (transistors, diodes, MOSFETs) that are on the very bottom rung of semiconductor manufacturing: High volume, low margin operations for extremely cheap, simple chips that still under-gird just about every electronic product made.
That Stockport (greater Manchester) fab was built in 1987, which is so many semiconductor generations ago I can’t even count. The only Nexperia fab left is in Hamburg, which is shown as being built in 1953, but since they’re running 200mm wafers, it was probably last upgraded in the 1990s, and supposedly turns out “100 billion devices per year.” Semiconductor fabs that turn out discretes are informally called “jelly bean factories,” and earn low but reliable profits.
The Dutch Economic Ministry said it made the “highly exceptional” decision to invoke the Goods Availability Act over “acute signals of serious governance shortcomings” within Nexperia.
“These signals posed a threat to the continuity and safeguarding on Dutch and European soil of crucial technological knowledge and capabilities,” the ministry said in a statement.
“Losing these capabilities could pose a risk to Dutch and European economic security.”
The statement did not detail why it thought the firm’s operations were risky. A spokesperson for the minister of economic affairs told the BBC there was no further information to share.
The measures are aimed to keep European chip supplies flowing and protect Dutch intellectual property, said EU-China researcher Sacha Courtial.
In a crisis, a Chinese-owned company could come under pressure from Beijing to halt supplies or prioritise sales to China, crippling European industries like carmakers and electronics manufacturers, he said.
The Hague’s move puts economic security “over free-market investment principles”, in what could pave the way for other governments to follow, said Mr Courtial from the Jacques Delors Institute.
The China Semiconductor Industry Association said on Tuesday that it is “seriously concerned” about the Dutch government taking control of Nexperia.
The group described the measures as “selective and discriminatory” against overseas branches of Chinese enterprises and undermine open trade.
The Dutch court document said records from a June 12 meeting between U.S. Commerce Department officials and the Dutch Foreign Ministry showed rising pressure to remove Nexperia’s Chinese CEO to help keep the company off the list.
“The fact that the company’s CEO is still the same Chinese owner is problematic,” the filing said, citing minutes from the Dutch-U.S. meeting. “It is almost certain the CEO will have to be replaced to qualify for the exemption from the entity list.”
Nexperia is caught between the U.S. and China, with U.S. President Donald Trump ratcheting up pressure on tech as part of a broader trade war in which he threatened 100% tariffs on China’s exports last week. Beijing has announced curbs on exports of rare earths.
Nexperia faces export restrictions from both governments, it said on Tuesday, and is seeking talks. It said a new interim CEO had been put in place after the former chief executive Zhang Xuezheng was removed from his post on a Dutch court order.
The documents released on Tuesday by the Amsterdam Commercial Court showed that Nexperia had been informed by the Dutch Economic Affairs Ministry on June 5 that the new U.S. rule might be coming and it should take action. “It was clear to all involved that (a U.S. listing) could have a significant negative impact on Nexperia and its business,” it said.
The fact the Dutch government so readily acceded to U.S. requests suggests that the case against Nexperia was pretty substantial, and the specter of possibly open conflict with an increasingly bellicose Russia may have played a factor in their decision making. Nailing down key supply chain components, no matter how lowly, is both far-sighted and suggests there’s more to this situation than meets the eye.
Also, it may be that Euroelites are simply tired of both Russia and China’s lawless shenanigans…
Loving County is not only the least populated county in Texas, but with 64 official inhabitants as of the 2020 census, it’s also the least populated county in the entire nation. (Kalawao County, Hawaii, on an island that was formerly a leper colony, comes in second.) Flat desert land up along the New Mexico border, Loving doesn’t have much to recommend it except splendid isolation.
And oil.
It’s that last little bit, Loving’s notable oil wealth, that probably inspired a carpetbagger gadfly from Indiana to try to take over Loving County.
Malcolm Tanner, a political activist from Indiana who has filed to run for president of the United States, has drawn widespread attention after the Houston Chronicle first reported on his plan to recruit new residents to Loving County by offering them free homes. Tanner purchased and subdivided land in the remote county, promising a title to anyone willing to move there, register to vote, and join his effort to remake the community’s government.
Tanner evidently ran for President in 2024, and made so little an impression that he failed to register the low four-digit totals of Vermin Supreme and “Lucifer Everylove.” Tanner’s platform (“an executive order that would provide African Americans with a $5,000 monthly settlement”) and naming his group “Melanated People of Power” does rather suggest a social justice bent to his politics.
Back to The Texan:
The plan’s implications are significant, given two defining features of Loving County: its minuscule population and its oil-rich tax base. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates only about 64 residents live within its boundaries, yet the county government takes in roughly $60 million annually in property tax revenue from the surrounding Permian Basin oilfields.
With the Chronicle reporting that Tanner has already relocated some 30 people to the area, an unprecedented political takeover has gone from just another viral social media post to a very serious reality.
“This woman right here is in the running to be the next county judge right here in Loving County,” Tanner said in one video, referring to a new resident while jokingly calling the area “Tanner County.”
In the footage, Tanner stands on a patch of dry, windswept land he claims as his future subdivision, surrounded by recruits who have accepted his offer of free homes and, according to his plan, will soon register to vote and run for local office.
This past week, Tanner also promoted an event called “Tanner Fest” in the county seat of Mentone, advertising “100 free homes up for grabs” and promising to “share the vision and process” behind his movement.
It does rather sound like Tanner is promising material rewards for voting his way. Tiny problem: That’s illegal under federal law.
In another video, Tanner is seen confronting a Loving County deputy at the courthouse. “Once we get here, we are going to fine-tooth everything,” he says. “If we find anything out of pocket, we’re gonna lock you up.” He also added that he believes county officials have been “stealing money.”
News of Tanner’s plan has triggered a wave of attention across state and national media — and drawn alarm from state and federal officials, who are now calling for investigations into what they describe as a potential threat to election integrity.
“We write to request immediate action and coordination among agencies to address serious election irregularities and threats of manipulation in Loving County,” state Sen. Kevin Sparks (R-Midland) and state Rep. Brooks Landgraf (R-Odessa) said in a joint letter last week to Secretary of State Jane Nelson.
The lawmakers cited “disparities in recent election results” and emphasized the seriousness of the matter. “All Texans, including those in the most rural areas, deserve fair and lawful elections,” they wrote, asking the secretary of state to “use all available authority to investigate and address election fraud in Loving County.”
Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a sweeping lawsuit and is seeking an emergency restraining order against an Indiana man accused of trying to “take over” Texas’ least populous county through what he is calling an illegal and unsafe settlement scheme.
Filed in Loving County’s 143rd Judicial District Court, the petition names Malcolm Tanner, a Crawfordsville, Indiana, resident who purchased two adjoining five-acre tracts in January of this year.
According to the complaint, Tanner has been using social media to invite followers—many of them women with children—to move to the barren property, promising “free homes” and even “$5,000 a month” if they help him “take over” local government.
“Indiana resident Malcolm Tanner has no right to try and take over Loving County with illegal schemes that endanger real Texans,” Paxton said in a statement. “His deceptive and unlawful scheme to lure people with free housing for the purpose of conducting a political takeover is a disgustingly fraudulent plot to line his own pockets.”
The lawsuit alleges Tanner’s property has no sewer, septic systems, or running water, relying instead on gas generators and a “burn pit” for trash disposal. Dozens of people have reportedly moved in, living in RVs and tents on the desolate land.
State attorneys say those conditions violate Chapter 341 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, which governs the disposal of sewage and other waste that could spread disease. The requested temporary restraining order would bar Tanner and others from discharging human waste in ways that could contaminate soil or groundwater and would prohibit any additional residents from moving onto the site until it meets health-code standards.
The 14-page filing goes further, accusing Tanner of running a “combination” engaged in organized criminal activity, citing alleged threats against law-enforcement and oil-field workers. It also seeks to declare the site a public nuisance and asks the court to impose any restrictions needed to prevent future “gang activity.”
Separately, Paxton’s office brings claims under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, asserting that Tanner falsely advertised free housing, misrepresented the quality of property being offered, and failed to disclose critical information about living conditions. The State is seeking up to $10,000 per violation and additional penalties of $10 to $200 per day for ongoing health-code violations.
Prosecutors note that Tanner has publicly bragged online about plans to “change the name of Loving County to Tanner County” and to run for president in 2028. The filing describes his effort as both a public-health hazard and a fraudulent political operation, alleging he “receives financial support from individuals as a condition of them remaining on the property.”
The attorney general’s office is asking the court to immediately issue an ex parte temporary restraining order, followed by a temporary and then permanent injunction halting habitation and advertising at the property.
If the scheme itself sound familiar, that’s because it’s exactly what Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh managed to do to Antelope (briefly “Rajneesh”), Oregon in the early 1980s: Encouraged his followers to settle there and take over the local town council. A lot of criminality and lunacy (including a “bioweapon attack” of salmonella) ensued before Rajneesh was deported for immigration fraud in 1985, and the whole scheme collapsed.
I had previously had the impression that no land in Loving County was for sale, as the locales didn’t want to sell, but it appears that a few plots are now available at relatively modest prices. I’m not sure how deep “Dr.” Malcolm Tanner’s pockets are, but the gadfly nature of his actions suggests someone bigger on impractical dreams than cold, hard cash.
I sincerely doubt Mr. Tanner has Bhagwan money.
In a way, Loving County is quite fortunate. Someone with deeper pockets and the ability not to shoot their mouth off about their cockamamie carpetbagging schemes might have actually managed a takeover of the county before anyone noticed…
Our left-leaning culture elites have been quite adverse to teaching people about the many bloody crimes of communism. Here in Austin, that may be changing, as the University of Texas is (however reluctantly) preparing to hold a teaching seminar on Communism.
The University of Texas at Austin is preparing to host a teaching seminar that will train faculty members to instruct students on the horrors of communism.
UT-Austin’s School for Civic Leadership partnered with the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation to host “Teaching the Twentieth Century: Communism and Dissent.” The event is scheduled for October 16 through October 18.
Attendees will participate in four sample class sessions from a senior professor. They will also attend four sessions on potential syllabi and pedagogy.
Examples of sessions include a discussion of communism and literature with Gary Saul Morson of Northwestern University, who has taught on Russian literature and intellectual history. The Claremont Institute’s Daniel J. Mahoney, who has defended “conservative-minded liberalism informed by classical and Christian wisdom,” will examine communism and revolution.
Historian Sean McMeekin, who has argued against whitewashing communist history, will deliver the keynote address.
Scott Yenor, a Heritage Foundation scholar who has previously criticized UT-Austin, told Texas Scorecard that the conference looks “great” and “inspired.”
Yenor called the speakers “some of the heaviest hitters among conservative intellectuals” and welcomed it as a counterbalance to “the woke garbage that usually spews from the [s]chools of education.”
The seminar is open to faculty members at “4-year or higher institutions.”
Leaves me out, alas.
To participate, faculty members must commit to teach a course on this subject within three semesters and “acquire express and written approval from their department chair or dean” that they will be allowed to teach the course within that timeframe.
Participants receive a $2000 stipend, paid out in two $1000 tranches.
Too bad. In the immortal words of Frito Pendejo from Idiocracy, “I like money.”
Whether UT and other institutions of higher learning can really shed their soft-spot for communism and socialism, two of the most disasterous failures of any political-economic theories in history, remains to be seen. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, and state government should continue holding UT’s feet to the fire to continue teaching the evils of communism.
Here’s a provocative Substack essay that argues that the 2020 Census was systemically, algorithmically polluted by a single data scientist.
The 2020 census was marketed as an “actual enumeration,” a neutral count of people for apportionment and funding. It was not. The same official who helped block a basic citizenship question in 2018, John M. Abowd, then the Census Bureau’s Chief Scientist, pushed through a new, opaque methodology in 2020 called differential privacy. The new system deliberately injected mathematical noise into every block count in America, turning the census from a headcount into a model with knobs. The knob that mattered most was a single parameter, epsilon, a secrecy shroud known only to a small inner circle. Abowd argued that a single added question about citizenship posed an intolerable risk to data quality because there was, he said, not enough time to test it. Then he rushed an untested algorithm that altered every count in every neighborhood. The irony is so sharp it cuts: the man who warned that one question might distort the census approved a method that guaranteed distortion.
Start with the record. On January 19, 2018, Abowd sent Commerce a technical memo urging rejection of a citizenship question. He then testified for several days in federal court. The transcript, nearly 700 pages, cemented a narrative that any citizenship question would degrade data and impede participation. The courts cited this drumbeat of doubt, and the question was blocked. The administration lost the public fight. But the inside fight over how to publish the data was only beginning. Abowd immediately advanced a quiet revolution in disclosure avoidance, adopting differential privacy for the first time ever in a US census. That choice, made outside the glare that attended the citizenship question, had far more sweeping consequences.
Differential privacy sounds harmless. In truth, it is a mechanism that turns correct data into false data according to a secret recipe. Abowd did not merely suppress a few cells in tiny places. Instead, he ran an algorithm across the map that perturbed the population of every census block, and it postprocessed the results so the fabricated numbers looked tidy. The output retained familiar columns, but the counts were no longer the counts. Abowd convinced his colleagues in the Bureau that implementing differential privacy was merely compliance with 13 U.S.C. § 9, its duty to protect confidentiality. Privacy is important. But privacy, as a constitutional matter, follows the enumeration, it does not negate it. A 2021 Harvard analysis of Abowd’s manipulation showed what this means in real life. When researchers simulated the Abowd’s algorithm using public test data, they found that differential privacy moves people around on paper, shifting them from one neighborhood to another in ways that make communities look less diverse and change their apparent political makeup. In plain terms, the system can make a mixed neighborhood look whiter or more uniform, and a balanced district look more partisan than it is. The study also showed that the noise makes it impossible to meet the Supreme Court’s “One Person, One Vote” rule, which requires legislative districts to have nearly equal populations. If each district’s population count is warped by secret noise, some citizens’ votes end up weighing more than others. When a method, by design, destabilizes the precise block totals that redistricting depends on, it stops being disclosure avoidance and becomes statistical alteration. The framers mandated counting people, not blurring them.
The core lever in differential privacy is epsilon, the privacy loss budget. Abowd kept this number secret throughout 2020. Cities, states, researchers, and map drawers who saw the early demonstration files warned that the counts were veering away from reality. They had no way to tell whether errors in their communities were genuine undercounts or synthetic artifacts of the algorithm. Abowd’s system also crippled the ability of local governments, analysts, and other record‑keepers to find and fix mistakes. Normally, if a city discovers a counting error that affects federal funding, it can appeal through the Count Question Resolution (CQR) Program. With differential privacy, that safeguard collapses, because the published data are wrong on purpose, no one can separate genuine miscounts from the algorithm’s fake ones. This nullifies the traditional oversight process and leaves states helpless to correct funding or representation errors. Alabama tried to challenge this secrecy in State of Alabama v. U.S. Department of Commerce (2021), arguing that differential privacy was unconstitutional and illegal, but the court dismissed the case for lack of standing cost the state billions in lost federal funding. Lawsuits and FOIAs followed. Only in 2021 did the Bureau reveal that its chosen global epsilon was 19.61, and even then, the design of the system prevented outsiders from verifying that this figure was actually used. The system was structured so that no one, not even Congress, could audit the dial that governed the size and allocation of the noise across the nation. Abowd’s answer was simply, “Trust me.”
Epsilon is not a philosophy, it is a number with consequences. The average census block contains about 105 people. With an epsilon of 19.61 and the Bureau’s noise allocation strategy, the algorithm effectively invented or erased on the order of ten to thirty people in many small areas. A block of 105 real residents could be published as 95, 115, or even further off, depending on postprocessing and the way the privacy budget was spent in that region. Across millions of blocks those errors do not cancel. They compound in the design of wards, precincts, and districts. Redistricting is a sum of blocks. Distort the blocks, and you distort the districts, the legislatures, and the House. This practice is not merely bad policy; it is plainly unconstitutional. The Supreme Court’s opinion in Department of Commerce v. House of Representatives (1999) made clear that statistical sampling for apportionment is illegal on statutory grounds. Abowd’s algorithmic manipulation is statistical sampling by another name, an unlawful substitution of estimated data for an actual enumeration required by the Constitution.
The proof arrived in March and May of 2022 when the Bureau’s own quality checks exposed a lopsided pattern. Fourteen states had statistically significant coverage errors, eight with overcounts and six with undercounts. The tilt was unmistakable. Democratic-leaning states were widely overcounted. Republican-leaning states were widely undercounted. Florida’s undercount was roughly three quarters of a million people. Texas’s undercount was on the order of a half million. Minnesota and Rhode Island kept seats they would have lost under an accurate count. Colorado gained a seat it did not deserve. Florida and Texas each missed multiple seats they should have gained. Analysts estimate the net effect was a shift of nine House seats away from Republican-leaning states and toward Democratic-leaning states. The Electoral College moved with them. More than $86 billion in federal formula funds followed.
Defenders say the pandemic caused the problem. That explains some fog, not the direction of the wind. The pattern of overcounts and undercounts tracked politics too cleanly to dismiss as random. A privacy method that was sold as neutral in theory coincided with partisan advantage in practice, and the guardians of the method refused to allow a transparent audit of its settings or its state by state allocation. Abowd, a Democrat donor, insisted that publishing epsilon values and the allocation mechanics would let bad actors reverse engineer the data to identify individuals. That claim collapses under basic scrutiny. If the risk of disclosing individuals is truly so sensitive that even the budget of the noise must be hidden, then differential privacy is the wrong tool for a decennial census that decides representation. The constitutional priority is accuracy of the count for apportionment. Privacy can be protected with targeted suppression or an “undetermined” flag for sensitive attributes. What cannot be justified is injecting falsity into the total number of people who live in each place.
If all this is true, President Trump’s call for a mid-decade census is more than justified. The constitution calls for an enumeration of citizens, not an algorithmic approximation poisoned by partisan pollution. A new count is needed to restore accuracy and remove illegal aliens from the census.
Before we get started, let’s get this classic meme out of the way:
The it, in this case, is federal layoffs due to the Schumer Shutdown. Democrats refused a continuing resolution because they insist that illegal alien health care subsidies must be part of any deal. Trump has told them to get stuffed and started laying off highly liberal, highly unionized federal workers.
The White House has begun laying off a “substantial” number of government employees, OMB Director Russ Vought announced Friday on X.
Can confirm RIFs have begun and they are substantial,” an OMB spokesperson told POLITICO, adding “These are RIFs not furloughs.”
The news comes on the 10th day of the government shutdown after Senate Democrats insisted on maintaining Obama-era benefits that include illegal immigrants, and both sides of the aisle have repeatedly failed to pass subsequent packages to fund the government.
According to the report, the layoffs have hit agencies including: Interior, Homeland Security, Treasury, EPA, Commerce, Education, Energy, HHS and HUD.
Several of those agencies shouldn’t even exist, so keep cutting.
On Thursday, Trump said his administration would target programs backed by Democrats – saying during a cabinet meeting: “We’re only cutting Democrat programs, I hate to tell you, but we are cutting Democrat programs,” adding “We will be cutting some very popular Democrat programs that aren’t popular with Republicans, frankly.”
The move follows an OMB memo leaked two weeks ago which ordered Trump administration officials to prepare to carry out reduction-in-force (RIF) plans during the shutdown, targeting employees that aren’t legally required – OR, those which conflict with Trump’s priorities.
Democrats are, of course, freaking out, but what did they expect when they launched the shutdown? The sequence of events unfolded thusly:
Trump: If you hand me this sword, I’m going to stab you with it.
Democrats: (Hands Trump a sword.)
Trump: (Stabs them.)
They’ve tossed Trump into the briar patch, and now he’s happily building a string of high priced condos there.
One wonders what congressional Democrats were thinking when they undertook this course of action. Did they actually believe their Trump Always Chickens Out talking points? Did that idea not die when our B-2s obliterated ChinaIran’s nuclear program? Did they believe he would apply the same bracketing strategy of alternating loosening and tightening of pressure he applied to foreign countries to them?
They clearly haven’t been paying attention to how President Trump negotiates when he has a clear upper hand: He’s willing to threaten the opposing party’s most cherished asset and escalate until the cows come home. He knows that control of the federal bureaucracy is one of the ways Democrats keep steering the country left despite Republican administrations. He also knows that, just as in the past, the American public blames whoever has blocked a clean resolution for shutdowns. He also knows that subsidizing illegal alien healthcare is deeply unpopular with American voters. Given all that, he has all the incentive in the world to keep purging Democrats from federal employment ranks, and cutting welfare state agencies down to the bone. For Trump it’s win-win, and for Democrats its lose-lose.
The fact they undertook this course of action despite every day of the shutdown making their situation worse suggests that not only is the party’s far left social justice ideological core in the driver’s seat, but that Trump Derangement Syndrome is now their primary motivating factor. Oppose Trump, no matter the cost, even if it actively hurts traditional allies (like labor unions and federal bureaucrats) and the party’s ostensible goals.
Despite Trump’s many virtues as President, he’s never been known as a budget cutter. But Democrat intransigence has finally made him one.
Trump might actually bring peace to the Middle East, the FBI behaving badly (again), Letitia James gets served a heaping plate of payback, a bomb factory goes boom, a dive into the mind of a social justice warrior, Ukraine keeps wrecking Russia’s oil infrastructure, and ShoeOnHead dives deep into really icky erotica aimed at women. Plus multiple good boys.
It’s the Friday LinkSwarm!
Peace in the Middle East? “Trump Announces Israel, Hamas Have Agreed to First Phase of Peace Deal to End Gaza War.”
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that Israel and Hamas have agreed on the first phase of his 20-point peace agreement to end the war in Gaza.
Hamas will exchange the remaining living and dead hostages in its captivity and Israel will respond by releasing Palestinian prisoners, Trump said on Truth Social.
“I am very proud to announce that Israel and Hamas have both signed off on the first Phase of our Peace Plan. This means that ALL of the Hostages will be released very soon, and Israel will withdraw their Troops to an agreed upon line as the first steps toward a Strong, Durable, and Everlasting Peace,” Trump said.
“All Parties will be treated fairly! This is a GREAT Day for the Arab and Muslim World, Israel, all surrounding Nations, and the United States of America, and we thank the mediators from Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey, who worked with us to make this Historic and Unprecedented Event happen,” he added.
“BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS!”
Snip.
With the deal on the table, the White House said Trump is considering a trip to the Middle East after he completes his annual checkup on Friday.
Releasing the hostages and prisoners is one aspect of the Trump administration’s plan to stop the fighting in Gaza and foster economic development in the region. Hamas is expected to begin releasing the hostages this upcoming weekend.
In September, the White House released Trump’s plan for stabilizing Gaza and creating a temporary governance structure to rebuild the territory and prevent Hamas from governing it after the war. At the same time, Trump gave Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the green light to escalate the conflict in Gaza if Hamas rejected his latest overture.
“With God’s help we will bring them all home,” Netanyahu said in a statement.
Trump’s announcement Wednesday marks the beginning of end of the war between Israel and Hamas after almost two years of fighting and tens of thousands of casualties. The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas fighters killed 1,200 innocent civilians and abducted more than 250 hostages.
If it works out and the hostages get home, fine and dandy, but Jihadis not living up to their promises and treaties is pretty much the norm, so I’m not going to hold my breath…
“Patel Fires FBI Agents, Ends CR-15 Squad After Learning Jack Smith Tracked GOP Senators. Patel also said the FBI “initiated an ongoing investigation with more accountability measures ahead.”
FBI Director Kash Patel announced he fired the agents and dismantled the squad after learning former Special Counsel Jack Smith tracked eight GOP senators while investigating then-former President Donald Trump.
Patel wrote on X:
Transparency is important and accountability is critical. We promised both, and this is what promises kept looks like. This FBI is delivering.
As a result of our latest disclosure about the baseless monitoring of members of Congress by the prior leadership team of the FBI, we have already taken the following actions:
We terminated employees, we abolished the weaponized CR-15 squad, and we initiated an ongoing investigation with more accountability measures ahead.
Transparency is important and accountability is critical. We promised both, and this is what promises kept looks like. This FBI is delivering.
As a result of our latest disclosure about the baseless monitoring of members of Congress by the prior leadership team of the FBI, we…
— FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) October 7, 2025
But will the DOJ take action against Smith? That’s my big question.
The CR-15 squad is a federal public corruption squad. It helped Smith during the Arctic Frost investigation, which involved Trump allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 election and the Capitol Hill Riot.
In May, Patel said he folded the squad and reassigned the agents. I’m unsure if today’s comments indicate that the FBI will no longer have another CR-15 squad.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) revealed the tracking memo on Monday. Smith tracked these eight senators:
Marsha Blackburn (TN)
Lindsey Graham (SC)
Bill Hagerty (TN)
Josh Hawley (MO)
Ron Johnson (WI)
Mike Kelly (PA)
Cynthia Lummis (WY)
Tommy Tuberville (AL)
Yet another reason President Autopen was so busy handing out pardons like Halloween candy…
R.S. McCain takes a deep dive into the Democrat Party’s social justice craziness.
Did you ever wonder how the Democratic Party got so crazy? For example, how is it that the governor of Illinois is inciting violent mobs against federal immigration authorities and meanwhile, in Virginia, every Democrat is rallying to the defense of Attorney General candidate Jay Jones, who openly fantasized about murdering political opponents?
To summarize briefly: Bad causes attract bad people.
To understand the symbiotic relationship between toxic political movements and their toxic supporters, my advice is to first read Eric Hoffer’s 1951 classic, The True Believer, especially Part 2: “The Potential Converts.” Next, you should read Friedrich Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom, focusing on Chapter 10, “Why the Worst Get on Top.” Among the personal experiences that led me to comprehend this phenomenon was being swarmed by a mob of “Occupy” protesters in 2011. If you ever had the misfortune to be in close proximity to a zombie horde like that, you would never doubt that the fundamental problem of the Democratic Party is that its grassroots “base” is composed of dangerous lunatics.
If you ever needed a reason to vote Republican, this is it: Democrats are the party of people who celebrate terrorist massacres of innocent Jews.
All of which is preamble to introducing you to the person calling herself “Cloud,” who describes herself as “Pisces / 26 / ATL / Immortal Angel Femboy / Cosplayer” on an Instagram account with approximately 8,000 followers. If ever anyone needed a Kiwi Farms LOLCow file . . .
This summer, “Cloud” went viral with a video denouncing Taylor Swift’s engagement to “MAGA-adjacent” Travis Kelce:
“I can already feel myself regretting making this video. If ten people are sitting at a table, and one of them is a Nazi, and the other nine people are not telling the Nazi to fuck off, then you’re at a table with ten Nazis. When Taylor Swift first started dating Travis Kelce and Travis Kelce was so open about his ‘respect’ for Donald Trump, I already knew we were reaching the beginning of the end, right? When she was posting photos with, like, other NFL wives and girlfriends or whatever, and they were all open MAGAs, and Taylor was happily posing with them on Instagram, I knew we were at the beginning of the end. I just didn’t know how long it would take for the general populace to catch on that it was the beginning of the end. You cannot be friends with people who have different opinions on you when those opinions are life and death for other people — when the Supreme Court ruling today has decided that certain people’s lives are genuinely worth more on paper than others. This is a black-and-white issue. I’m sorry, but there is no nuance when it comes to Trump. You’re either chill with the guy who has death camps in El Salvador or you’re not. And the only reason I’m making this video is because I’ve been very open about how much I love Taylor Swift during the last few years. So I do feel obligated to come on here and say she is MAGA — or at least, MAGA-adjacent. And I’m sorry, as a trans person, if you’re Nazi-adjacent, that’s still a Nazi to me. Do with that info whatever you will.”
Oh, wow — where to begin unraveling this gigantic yarn-ball of dangerous craziness? To start with, the Supreme Court ruling she references (see “NY Times on the Left’s Skrmetti Bungle: ‘Somebody Set Up Us the Bomb’,” June 21) was a consequence of transgender activists overplaying their hand, trying to claim that a state law prohibiting transgender “treatment” for children to be a form of sex-based discrimination that violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pause for a moment to ask yourself whether those who voted to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 intended for it to protect the use of synthetic hormones and surgery to turn children into carnival sideshow freaks. As a legal theory, this is bizarre, and yet “Cloud” (who identifies as a “trans person” despite apparently having undergone no such treatment herself) sees the Skrmetti ruling as “life or death.” This over-the-top rhetoric is entirely consistent with her lazy formula “MAGA = Nazi.” If you don’t vote for Democrats, you are a latter-day Hitler, she contends, and therefore . . . ?
Violence is the logical conclusion of a syllogism built on such premises, and good luck trying to convince Democratic voters that their belief system is based on dubious premises and fallacies. Having convinced themselves that they are “on the right side of history,” they consider it a hate crime to disagree with them. This fanaticism attracts bad people to the Democratic Party banner, and the bad people expect their party to represent their beliefs, which is why the Democrats are so crazy.
A federal grand jury in Eastern Virginia has indicted New York Attorney General Letitia James on one count of bank fraud, multiple outlets are reporting.
US Attorney Lindsey Halligan presented the case to the grand jury on Thursday, according to sources, one month after she was installed in her role.
As noted in August, a criminal referral was filed against James, alleging that she had “falsified records” to get home loans for a Virginia property that she claimed was her “principal residence” in 2023 – while she was serving as a New York state prosecutor.
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte sent the missive to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche, claiming that in late August 2023 – weeks before she launched her civil fraud trial against the Trump Organization for inflating the values of its properties.
In 2021, James also purchased a 5-family Brooklyn property, but has “consistently misrepresented the same property as only having four units in both building permit applications and numerous mortgage documents and applications,” the letter noted.
Loans secured for this property could have reduced her mortgage interest rate by as much as 1% – leaving James with lower monthly payments under the federal Home Assistance Modification Program (HAMP) since it was listed as containing just four units, according to Pulte.
More on that subject:
Not trying to make a political point here.
I spent years as a mortgage banker at Quicken Loans (now Rocket Mortgage), the number one mortgage lender in the country, before I ever went to law school. So when I see stories like this, I look at them a little differently.
The Trump Administration has designated international drug cartels as unlawful combatants.
President Donald Trump has finally named the enemy: Mexican drug cartels. Declaring them unlawful combatants and recognizing a “non-international armed conflict” marks one of the most consequential national security shifts in modern history.
For decades, Washington treated cartel violence as a crime — a problem for prosecutors, not generals. Indictments were filed, assets seized, and sanctions imposed. But the cartels fought a different kind of war, one that combined terror, intelligence, and territorial control. Calling it “crime” guaranteed defeat.
We refused to define the cartels as belligerents — and fought the wrong fight.
According to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project, Mexico ranks among the world’s most violent conflict zones — behind only Palestine, Myanmar, and Syria. It is also the second-most dangerous country for civilians. Those numbers are not from a failed state overseas. They come from our southern border, where cartel wars spill into American communities daily.
For decades, federal authorities insisted on using a law-enforcement lens. Agencies operated under Title 21, Title 50, and limited “detect and monitor” authorities. They punished crimes but never broke campaigns. The narrow scope bred strategic blindness. While U.S. prosecutors filed indictments and built cases, cartels corrupted institutions, coerced populations, and built empires.
As the Marine Corps teaches: How you define the environment determines how you operate in it. We refused to define the cartels as belligerents — and fought the wrong fight.
By every operational measure, cartels are hybrid threats. They control territory, command loyalty through terror, and run parallel governments. They tax, adjudicate, and even “protect” local populations. Their power rests on corruption and espionage: bribing officials, infiltrating agencies, and compromising law enforcement through human networks that resemble intelligence tradecraft.
Cartels operate across land, air, maritime, subterranean, cyber, and electromagnetic domains. They deploy drones, tunnels, jammers, and encrypted systems. They are multi-domain actors running hybrid campaigns.
Cartels don’t just smuggle — they destabilize. Mass migration has become a weapon of war: overwhelming institutions, hiding operatives, and masking foreign infiltration. Millions of illegal entrants from more than 170 nations have crossed under cartel supervision. The intent is not just profit. It’s demographic disruption.
Under federal law, terrorism includes violence intended “to intimidate or coerce a civilian population” or “influence government policy.” By that definition, Sinaloa and Jalisco New Generation qualify as terrorist organizations.
Munitions plant explodes in Bucksnort, Tennessee. Which is a real place off I-40. “Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC (AES) is a certified Women-Owned Small Business specializing in the production, handling, and storage of energetic materials for military, aerospace, and commercial demolition sectors.” Chopper footage shows the place leveled.
“Ukrainian drones hit multiple targets in Russia [including] the Feodosia oil depot in Crimea, a chemical plant Sverdlov in Dzerzhinsk and power plants in Belgorod and Klintsy.”
They also carried out a drone strike on a key oil pumping station in Efimovka. “The station [is] a key node on the Kuibyshev-Tikhoretsk pipeline that moves Urals crude to the Black Sea.”
Finland’s President Alexander Stubb says that Russia’s economy is crumbling. “Inflation is over 20% which means that their [financial] reserves are close to zero.” Also: “In the past roughly 1,000 days, Russia has advanced only one percentage point of Ukrainian territory.”
Eman Abdelhadi, an associate professor in the university’s Department of Comparative Human Development, was arrested Friday and charged with two counts of aggravated battery to a government employee, a Class 3 felony, and two counts of resisting/obstruction peace, a Class A misdemeanor, the Cook County Sheriff’s Office told Fox News.
Radical sociologist Abdelhadi, who previously cursed out her employer while speaking at a “Socialism 2025” conference, is due in court again on Tuesday.
It sounds like University of Chicago already has plenty of evidence to fire Abdelhadi for cause.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton joins lawsuit to close the Texas Republican primary. Paxton might quite rightly have a conflict of interest here, since Democrats voting in he Republican primary would obviously favor his Senate race opponent John Cornyn…
EPCOR Utilities Inc. recently announced its intent to begin construction and eventual operation of a facility in Galveston Bay, a region that is home to almost eight million people.
Beginning with a permit application with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), EPCOR is planning to construct a desalination plant on the San Leon Peninsula, which, according to a press release, will supply approximately 26.5 million gallons of fresh water per day.
The Bayshore Desalination Facility is projected to be completed in approximately five years if the design and construction phases are allowed to proceed.
Various government entities have been warning about potential water shortages for some time now, so it’s good to get ahead of the curve.
“Morning Glory Milking Farm [is] a popular romance novel about a young woman down on her luck who does what every young woman does when facing financial struggle. She starts an Only Fans. No, I’m just kidding. She wouldn’t degrade herself like that. She gets a job jerking off monsters.”
“I forgot to inform you that there is a new epidemic. An epidemic that many have yet to discuss and that epidemic is female Gooners. Now, for those of you unaware, Goonar is internet slang for someone addicted to porn, and smut is slang for dark romance novels, otherwise known as porn.” [sigh] I did a tiny bit of research on the term “gooner” when I first came across it in an Asmongold video, and Shoe is slightly off in her definition, as the most common use of the term seems to be someone who masturbates constantly without achieving orgasm.
“I actually read the book myself, and I’m not going to lie: the Nineteenth Amendment needs to be abolished.”
“I like how in this fantasy world, student loans still exist. Like, we can imagine a world with minotaurs and humans in a relationship, but we can’t imagine a world without student loans.”
She reads a goodly portion of the scene where the minotaur insists on paying for his handmaiden’s dinner. “Inside every woman there are two wolves or two bulls, the strong independent girl boss and the submissive doting housewife. And in the presence of a masculine man, or a farm animal, she will fold like a lawn chair and instantly return to factory settings.”
“Women are going to be picking up Animal Farm now, ‘like, where’s the horse cock?'”
One of the books Amazon recommended after she bought this one: Pounded By Produce.
“Are we really going to pretend that a story about a young woman getting a job milking mythical creatures to pay off her student debt is not funny? It’s funny. If that makes me a sexist misogynist, you got me. To act like you are so different and above the other Gooners is just it’s silly. I’m sorry, but you are no different than Joe Schmo jerking it to Fat Booty Latinas in Space 12.”
Just wait until she talks about women attending the “Sinners and Stardust” convention and actually sexually assaulting a man there. So if you’re a single man desperate enough to attend such a convention know that the odds are good, but the goods are odd…
“The women are like conquered and taken and overpowered by these monsters. And I think many of these women are reading these books containing monsters and not men because masculinity and dominance in men has been completely demonized in modern society. But the truth is many women still crave it. You see, the monsters in these stories have those like dominant masculine traits that women like so much, but they’re not human men. They have all these traits women desire without the problematic baggage human men bring without being the men they hate or have been told to hate. It is the perfect guilt-free slop.”
On the other hand, he thinks Tron: Ares is “complete arse. “I’ve got plenty of issues with Tron: Legacy, but that movie was a goddamn masterpiece compared to this.” “Not only can Disney not be trusted as the custodians of other people’s IPs that they bought their way into, they can’t even be trusted to manage their own fucking IPs at this point.”
Ridley Scott says that most films today are crap. on the one hand, he’s right. On the other hand, he’s also the director of Prometheus, so glass houses, stones…
If you’re looking into left-wing NGOs that channel money to domestic terror organizations like Antifa, the same names show up again and again: Soros, Singham, Arabella, Tides. If you’ve followed this blog, you’ve probably already know that. Now President Trump does as well.
Let’s recap what unfolded during Wednesday afternoon’s Antifa roundtable at the White House, hosted by President Trump.
Several journalists shared firsthand accounts of being attacked by Antifa activists, but the real fireworks came from Seamus Bruner, Director of Research at the Government Accountability Institute, who briefed the president and his cabinet on a complex network of dark-money NGOs and activist groups fueling unrest nationwide via the permanent protest-industrial complex.
“We have identified dozens of radical organizations, not just the decentralized Antifa organizations, but dozens of radical organizations that have received more than $100 million from the Riot Inc investors,” Bruner told Trump.
Elon Musk chimed in on X, commenting on a video featuring Bruner’s public briefing to the president about the dark-money NGOs, saying, “Way more than $100M of US taxpayer money.”
Snip.
According to GAI’s findings, the chaos now gripping cities like Portland, Chicago, and Los Angeles — especially the recent waves of anti-ICE violence — isn’t spontaneous. It’s organized, coordinated, and funded.
Bruner’s new research maps how progressive philanthropic networks intersect with activist groups that have escalated from demonstrations to riots. The report highlights how complex webs of charitable entities, donor-advised funds, and online platforms provide cover for financing activism that sometimes crosses into criminal behavior.
Organizations like Antifa, the Socialist Rifle Association (SRA), and the John Brown Gun Club operate decentralized chapters, making it difficult to track funding trails without subpoena power,” Bruner said on X. “GAI has identified multiple online fundraising platforms where accountability gaps can obscure who contributes and how funds are used. The leftist funding platform, Open Collective, still allows for crowdfunding for these groups.”
The first step should be an immediate halt to any taxpayers fund finding their way into into the accounts of these far-left riot funding organizations. Next should be DOJ lawsuits, subpoenas for financial and communication records, followed by forensic audits of proctological intensity. Then should come criminal prosecutions for anyone that actively encouraged and contributed money specifically for violence and rioting.
And every NGO that contributed to this effort should be closed, their assets seized, and their records published to name and shame those who committed political violence in the name of radical leftwing social justice.
In the wake of escalating political violence nationwide, Attorney General Ken Paxton announced the initiation of undercover operations aimed at infiltrating and dismantling left-wing groups associated with political extremism in Texas.
The Office of the Attorney General will specifically target organizations alleged to have ties to Antifa and other radical movements, citing increased incidents of armed attacks on federal facilities and threats to public safety.
Paxton warned of the dangers posed by “leftist political terrorism,” referencing ideologies such as Antifa and “the radical transgender movement.”
Paxton described these groups as “a cancer on our culture,” asserting that they have “unleashed their deranged and drugged-up foot soldiers on the American people.”
There can be no compromise with those who want us dead. To that end, I have directed my office to continue its efforts to identify, investigate, and infiltrate these leftist terror cells.
Paxton’s remarks follow President Donald Trump officially designating Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, directing federal agencies to investigate, disrupt, and dismantle any illegal operations associated with the organization.
Building on this federal action, Paxton has instructed his staff to expand investigations into radical leftist organizations suspected of supporting or committing acts of violence.
Paxton referenced several violent incidents that precipitated these measures:
In July, nearly two dozen armed left-wing militants attacked an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Alvarado.
On September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was killed in what officials identified as a politically motivated act by a person associated with the “radical transgender movement.”
Two weeks after the Kirk incident, an ICE facility in Dallas was also targeted by gunfire in a separate attack allegedly linked to left-wing radicalism.
The OAG is coordinating undercover investigations with state and federal law enforcement to infiltrate organizations believed to promote violence or engage in terrorist activity.
Note the two of those examples, Alvarado and the Dallas ICE attack, happened in Texas, providing jurisdiction for the Texas Attorney General to get involved.
It’s long been known that far left organizations like George Soros’ Tides Foundation or Neville Roy Singham’s Party for Socialism and Liberation have pumped money into Antifa, sometimes through organizational cutouts to obscure the cash flow. Both Paxton and Kash Patel should be working on subpoenas for bank and communication records for such organizations, to be followed quickly by criminal charges and lawsuits to shut them down for good.
Antifa’s decentralized nature make it a difficult next of vipers to eradicate, but when you cut off its head, a snake dies…
The top of the ticket on the Republican side in Texas is now a three-way race as Congressman Wesley Hunt (R-TX-38) made his long-rumored challenge to Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) and Attorney General Ken Paxton official on Monday.
“What I’ve seen in polling over the past few months is people want an alternative, and I’m going to give it to them,” Hunt told the Associated Press.
Hunt, a U.S. Army veteran, is a second-term congressman from Harris County’s 38th Congressional District who’s allied himself with President Donald Trump since running for the new district in 2022 after the previous year’s post-Census redistricting.
Launching with a campaign video, Hunt said in a press release, “This campaign is about defending the timeless conservative values that built this state and this nation. My convictions do not waver, they do not falter, and they do not bend to political pressure. I will fight for Texas with the same courage and resolve with which I once fought for our country in combat.”
“Washington does not get to dictate what happens in Texas. Bureaucrats in D.C. do not choose Texas’ leadership; Texans do. This race will be settled by Texans, not entrenched political figures from inside the beltway.”
Cornyn campaign spokesman Matt Mackowiak told The Texan, “Senator Cornyn has soared ahead in the latest polling and will win this election. Wesley Hunt is a legend in his own mind. No one is happier this morning than the national Democrats who are watching Wesley continue his quixotic quest for relevancy, costing tens of millions of dollars that will endanger the Trump agenda from being passed.”
Nick Maddux, spokesman for Paxton’s campaign, told The Texan, “We welcome Wesley Hunt to the race. Primaries are good for our party and our voters, and Welsey and General Paxton both know that Texans deserve better than the failed, anti-Trump record of John Cornyn.”
Cornyn and Paxton have long established their campaign lanes — the former backed by Senate leadership and the more established part of the Republican Party; the latter supported by conservatives unhappy with the incumbent for various reasons. But Hunt’s is less clear, potentially taking from both candidates already in the race.
In the most recent poll from Ragnar Research that shows Cornyn and Paxton neck and neck just above 30 percent, Hunt polled at 17 percent.
Voters know how they generally feel about Cornyn and Paxton, both in single digits for the “don’t know enough” category of support and opposition in a recent survey from Texas Southern University; Hunt’s unknown category registered at 45 percent.
Hunt’s net favorability rating is +39 percent to Paxton’s +19 percent and Cornyn’s +5 percent among Republicans.
That’s a nice high favorability rating to start with, but Hunt has never run statewide. I’m guessing the average voter knows he’s a Republican, a congressman, and he’s black, but probably little more. A few more people may have heard about him due to his interview with Joe Rogan or that campaign ad that first introduced him. Hunt has a 97% conservative rating from CPAC, and an A from Gun Owners of America.
While Hunt has filed a good two months before the December 8 deadline, he’s getting in fairly late from an organizational and fundraising perspective. Paxton has led Cornyn in just about all polling, though by varying amounts. Through Q2 (haven’t seen any Q3 numbers yet), Cornyn has raised $8 million to Paxton’s $2.9 million. Hunt, whose congressional campaigns suggest he’s a solid middle-of-the-pack fundraiser, has a lot of catching up to do and not much time to do it.
I was struck with this post by Penny Arcade’s Tyco, AKA Jerry Holkins.
I don’t understand why I thought that more information would be better. I think it’s just because I like information. To be fair, though, I couldn’t have imagined what it would actually look like. Coming from a religious environment of High Control I imagined that shattering that status would necessarily have a liberatory payload, as it had for me. I try not to feel too bad. In the prescient Neuromancer, William Gibson could imagine a digital world parallel to our own, one in which you could be functionally embodied, live, and die, but couldn’t imagine that something could be wireless. And he’s way smarter than me.
Because I’ve been sick, and spending an inordinate time in fever spikes until the Advil kicks in, I’ve had the “opportunity” to spend a lot of time in bed on TikTok. I don’t think it’s possible to understand your children at all if you don’t have some knowledge of it. Cultural shift is in some ways a function of baud rate, which has never been higher, if you’re wondering why you feel old at twenty-eight. Noone has ever lived like this and it’s not clear that they should.
TikTok is a litter box of misinformation; even the clean litter is made questionable simply as a fact of its adjacency. Here are just a few of the notions I’ve been presented with the last couple days, and not just once, but multiple times:
– There is conclusive proof that interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is a spacecraft
– There are modern instances of human parthenogenesis, or “virgin birth”
– Pranks where young women generate photorealistic images of men entering their dorms and houses and send them to their parents asking “what should I do”
– It is safe for orangutans and other wilderness beasts to jump on backyard trampolines, and they do so frequently
– Model-generated content of virtually every stripe that would would fool a hundred percent of anyone even five seconds older than me
The amount of AI material on TikTok broadly is just insane, the most obvious examples of which are Jesus Christ bedeviled by… well, the Devil, coupled with a suggestion to like and subscribe to help “our savior.” I’m not a hundred percent sure it works like that. But AI is often just grabbing other people’s videos and altering them slightly and then posting them to accounts whose names look like the kind of password a password manager would automagically generate. The idea I think is that you simply have to be more human to stand out and defeat these machines, like John Henry. Maybe that would make sense in a world not governed by algorithmic feeds, where people chose what they were watching, but we often don’t. Also, John Henry dies at the end of that story.
Gen X is the equivalent of pre-war steel. I’m not implying a particular moral valence, or establishing a hierarchy of moral purity; the thing that largely defines my cadre is that we’ve always resisted the term anyway. We are as subject to propaganda as any human being; we take plus two from flank attacks like everybody else. But having a formed identity prior to the ambient radiation of social media is like having been administered a vaccine they don’t make anymore. Because they can’t.
Bold added.
All worth thinking about, but it’s the last that hits hardest. In the first huge burst of the Internet in the mid-1990s, early adopters talked about “drinking from the firehose” as the torrent of information and connectivity it provided. And that was mostly text-based information.
Today’s Gen Alpha kids live in that firehose.
Every generation changes based on the most powerful information and communication mediums of their day, as Baby Boomers weened on TV, telephones and rock and roll can attest. But it’s not just the content, it’s the speed with which this unstoppable Mississippi of information is being poured into youthful heads. A few years ago, back when I could occasionally afford having a maid come over to clean my house before July 4th or New Year’s Eve, one of them brought their young daughter with them. While their mother cleaned, she sat there endlessly scrolling Tik-Tok videos, one after another in quick succession.
I remember when someone wrote it was impossible to completely scan cable TV stations for something to watch, and started out by saying “Assuming you spend 4 seconds on each channel,” and I went “Who the hell spends that much time? I can do that in a second or less per station.” I suspect saying kids doom-scrolling Tik-Tok videos spend a second or less on each one probably dramatically understates how quickly they scroll past anything that fails to engage their mayfly gaze. Remember when critics said MTV would destroy attention spans? Today’s kids probably regard four minutes to wait for the next video as an excruciating, Masterpiece Theater level of slowness.
If you dropped today’s teenagers into the wilderness with maps and compasses, could they find their way out or would they be helpless without their smart phones to guide them? Can they apply critical thinking skills, or is the first answer ChatGPT hands them always the “right” answer in their minds?
Of course I also remember when some evangelicals claimed Dungeons & Dragons would turn you into Satan worshipers. Didn’t seem to happen to my generation, but now there are actual Satanic tranny death cults, so maybe somebody owes the shade of Jack Chick an apology.
And all this rewiring of children’s brains was already happening before the arrival of widespread commercial AI. And that Pandora’s Box is bringing with a whole host of unforeseen problems, including chatbots allegedly pushing teens to commit suicide.
In science fiction of the 1980s and 90s, AIs were a key component of a theorized technological singularity. Simply put, the singularity is the point in human history in which technological innovation goes vertical, beyond which the outcome is impossible to predict. World Wars I and II were both singularity events, in which human history would be forever altered and for which no one could foresee the new shape of the world before the event.
I’m pretty sure we’re in the midst of such a singularity right now.
We thought AI was going to do things like achieve engineering breakthroughs and create more nutritious crops with which to feed the world. Instead AI hallucinations seem to be creating new ways to lie to people, with more weirdly elaborate lies than ever before, like the guy who ChatGPT convinced had discovered a new breakthrough in physics, but it was all delusional crap.
The joke is a company announcing “We can finally create the Torment Nexus from the classic science fiction novel Don’t Create the Torment Nexus.”
But it seems that the combination of social media plus AI is creating vast warrens of individual Torment Nexi rabbit holes. And AI coming of age at the same time that the woke mind virus was was running rampant made everything immeasurably worse.
No one set out to create the Torment Nexus, it just popped out as an emergent property of cramming all human knowledge into Tessier-Ashpool’s white hot data cores. It used to be that the road to Hell was paved with good intentions, but now we’re told that the road to Heaven just naturally passes through the Torment Nexus. Just ignore the stinging radioactive flames as you make your way to paradise.
It just turns out that the Torment Nexus is the singularity’s default setting.
